![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| General Vista Help and Support The general Windows Vista discussion forum, for topics not covered elsewhere. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.general) |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I'm just wondering where my problem reports go when I've marked them
"Public". -- Peter Toronto, Canada XP Pro SP2 X 2 + Vista Beta 5536 |
|
|||
|
They go to the same place that private bugs go, except public bugs can be
read and commented on by the technical beta testers. -- - JB Windows Vista Support Faq http://www.jimmah.com/vista/ |
|
|||
|
Thanks. So if they think it's worthy of comment they'll post it here? The
reason I asked is someone earlier today commented to mark such reports public so they would appear here. -- Peter Toronto, Canada XP Pro SP2 X 2 + Vista Beta 5536 "Jimmy Brush" wrote in message ... They go to the same place that private bugs go, except public bugs can be read and commented on by the technical beta testers. -- - JB Windows Vista Support Faq http://www.jimmah.com/vista/ |
|
|||
|
No, the comments are made on the bug report via a private website.
The reason you should mark a bug as public is so if you have a question about your bug report, you can post here and provide the bug id# that it was assigned, and then one of the technical beta testers that read this forum can look at your bug report on the private web site and tell you what it says. -- - JB Windows Vista Support Faq http://www.jimmah.com/vista/ |
|
|||
|
Ok, now I understand. Thanks.
-- Peter Toronto, Canada XP Pro SP2 X 2 + Vista Beta 5536 "Jimmy Brush" wrote in message ... No, the comments are made on the bug report via a private website. The reason you should mark a bug as public is so if you have a question about your bug report, you can post here and provide the bug id# that it was assigned, and then one of the technical beta testers that read this forum can look at your bug report on the private web site and tell you what it says. -- - JB Windows Vista Support Faq http://www.jimmah.com/vista/ |
|
|||
|
Why aren't they all public JB and why does Connect hide full access to bug
contexts from the public? The public can't access which bugs are fixed, search them, which bugs are purportedly deferred (meaning fogeddahboutdit), how many bugs are marked "by design" that aren't--I'd like a nickle for every beta tester who has complained about the latter for nearly a year repeatedly and vociferously. CH "Jimmy Brush" wrote in message ... They go to the same place that private bugs go, except public bugs can be read and commented on by the technical beta testers. -- - JB Windows Vista Support Faq http://www.jimmah.com/vista/ |
|
|||
|
JB--
"via a private website"=Translation--"it's a secret." "The reason you should mark a bug as public is so if you have a question about your bug report, you can post here and provide the bug id# that it was assigned, and then one of the technical beta testers that read this forum can look at your bug report on the private web site and tell you what it says" Isn't what you just described ridiculous, Russian Roulettesque, and counter intuitive to anything an adult has ever learned to get done for himself? Why should anyone who is interested in Vista enough to bug it have to submit to that kind of arms length, chance situation. It's enough for MSFT people to bug without having to hope someone "adopts their bug cause." But I think it shows how stupid they believe the public might be. Suppose you had to be somewhere tomorrow but were told you aren't allowed to drive your car but a designated driver might see you frantically waving and he can drive your car there? You could post here and maybe someone who is on the list to drive your car can arrange to get you there. That's a ridiculous scenario for anyone to consider. How do you impose "clear, confident, connected" on that equation? It sounds "Nebulous, tentative and disconnected to me?" Talk about intuitive--for the whole Beta the IE ToolsOptionsDelete Temp Internet Files box says at the same time "delete browsing history" but that is not what deleting tifs does or the signficance of it, or is it the same as deleting history connected with index.dat (many users want their browsing history intect; some might not). Why was it labled this way? Who knows what the IE team was thinking. CH "Jimmy Brush" wrote in message ... No, the comments are made on the bug report via a private website. The reason you should mark a bug as public is so if you have a question about your bug report, you can post here and provide the bug id# that it was assigned, and then one of the technical beta testers that read this forum can look at your bug report on the private web site and tell you what it says. -- - JB Windows Vista Support Faq http://www.jimmah.com/vista/ |
|
|||
|
Bug reports form technical beta testers only show up on
connect.microsoft.com and remember this is not the private newsgroups. -- Take Care, Will "Peter" wrote in message ... I'm just wondering where my problem reports go when I've marked them "Public". -- Peter Toronto, Canada XP Pro SP2 X 2 + Vista Beta 5536 |
|
|||
|
Chad Harris Wrote: Why aren't they all public JB and why does Connect hide full access to bug contexts from the public? The public can't access which bugs are fixed, search them, which bugs are purportedly deferred (meaning fogeddahboutdit), how many bugs are marked "by design" that aren't--I'd like a nickle for every beta tester who has complained about the latter for nearly a year repeatedly and vociferously. My guess is that some bugs may pose a security risk and if they were made publically known could cause serious problems. Incidentally, I wonder how many people do actually file bug reports for Vista and how many people just use it because they want the latest OS? I bet the majority of people who download it care not a jot about bug reports and simply do not bother. |
|
|||
|
Beck wrote:
Chad Harris Wrote: Why aren't they all public JB and why does Connect hide full access to bug contexts from the public? The public can't access which bugs are fixed, search them, which bugs are purportedly deferred (meaning fogeddahboutdit), how many bugs are marked "by design" that aren't--I'd like a nickle for every beta tester who has complained about the latter for nearly a year repeatedly and vociferously. My guess is that some bugs may pose a security risk and if they were made publically known could cause serious problems. Incidentally, I wonder how many people do actually file bug reports for Vista and how many people just use it because they want the latest OS? I bet the majority of people who download it care not a jot about bug reports and simply do not bother. My only current interest in Vista is making sure my own software will install and run on it. If I discover bugs in Vista that prevent this (and I have) I will most certainly report them (and I have). I do resent the fact that I am unable to view the status of my own bug report. David Wilkinson |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|