A Windows Vista forum. Vista Banter

Welcome to Vista Banter.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

Go Back   Home » Vista Banter forum » Microsoft Windows Vista » Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance)

Vista HP Users - Need Some Info on YOUR System Restore for comparison...



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old February 29th 08, 09:33 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.general,microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
Julian[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 77
Default Vista HP Users - Need Some Info on YOUR System Restore for comparison...

[Julian I-Do-Stuff - Some Vista stuff, but mostly just Stuff at
http://berossus,blogspot.com]

I - and I suspect many other Vista HP users - are suffering from having very
limited system restore capabilities (short history, just a few points)

With the help of Mark and a 3rd party utility from
http://www.shadowexplorer.com it has been discovered that my Vista HP system
is putting an awful lot more into ShadowStorage (where Vista keeps the
System Restore points) than it ought to (because unlike Ultimate etc. there
is no "restore from shadow storage" file/folder versioning capability in HP)

I would be grateful if, for comparison purposes you, could share the
following info on your vanilla Vista HP system restore points (as long as
your system isn't brand new and hasn't had time to try and accumulate much -
say for systems older than 1 month?)... if you could just bottom post and
stick the answers into the "colums" below that would be *most* helpful

Thanks in advance for your contribution/collaboration

Size of C drive in GB Current Number of Restore Points Date of
Oldest Restore Point (optional) How old is your system (months)
(optional)


  #2 (permalink)  
Old February 29th 08, 10:20 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.general,microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
Julian[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 77
Default Vista HP Users - Need Some Info on YOUR System Restore for comparison...

Thanks to Windows Mail for messing with the formatting... so much for the
"columns" - I've rearranged the text

And if you are interested in more about what the problem to be solved is see
http://berossus.blogspot.com/search/...stem%20Restore

Size of C drive in GB...................................
Current Number of Restore Points...............
Date of Oldest Restore Point (optional)........
How old is your system (months) (optional)..

  #3 (permalink)  
Old February 29th 08, 10:49 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.general,microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
Rick Rogers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,428
Default Vista HP Users - Need Some Info on YOUR System Restore for comparison...

FWIW

Size of C drive in GB...................................111GB (74GB free)
Current Number of Restore Points...............18
Date of Oldest Restore Point (optional)........Feb 2, 2008
How old is your system (months) (optional)..14 months


System Restore set to default size of 15% of drive space. List ShadowStorage
shows 15.7GB used of 16.8 maximum space available, so a quick calculation
shows an average point is just under 1GB.

Keep in mind that if the volume approaches less than 15% free space, the
system will actively work to maintain this by reducing alloted space for
non-critical processes. Each point contains not only the system file
shadows, but also those of a user's files. If you have a lot of files, then
the corresponding restore points will be larger.

From your blog:

"Why should a Restore Point be much less than 2GB? Because restore points
ought to be only differences from the current system state, and if not much
is being installed, uninstalled, updated etc. the changes should be
relatively small."

That's not how vss works. It doesn't record only changes, that would be a
differential backup. System Restore is more akin to a "copy" of the system
at a point in time that can be replaced on demand. Each restore point is a
copy unto itself, and is not reliant on any other point, so each would be
expected to be appropriately sized.

--
Best of Luck,

Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
My thoughts http://rick-mvp.blogspot.com

"Julian" wrote in message
...
Thanks to Windows Mail for messing with the formatting... so much for the
"columns" - I've rearranged the text

And if you are interested in more about what the problem to be solved is
see http://berossus.blogspot.com/search/...stem%20Restore



  #4 (permalink)  
Old February 29th 08, 11:11 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.general,microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
Julian[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 77
Default Vista HP Users - Need Some Info on YOUR System Restore for comparison...

Thanks for the input Rick..

Re how VSS works - Doh! I see I confused myself g Clearly differential
backups w.r.t some nominal "full backup" in ShadowStorage wouldn't work as
the reference backup would eventually disappear (on a FIFO basis) and render
the subsequent "backups" useless.... I had a momentary vision of
"differential" backups being relative to the current systems state... pity I
didn't think a moment longer and realise that would be equally pointless -
I've acknowledged your point and amended my comments in the blog!

My Windows folder alone seems to be 9.79GB (!) (45k files in 8k folders), so
I can't help wondering how Vista works out what needs to be "copied"

"Rick Rogers" wrote in message
...
FWIW

Size of C drive in GB...................................111GB (74GB free)
Current Number of Restore Points...............18
Date of Oldest Restore Point (optional)........Feb 2, 2008
How old is your system (months) (optional)..14 months


System Restore set to default size of 15% of drive space. List
ShadowStorage shows 15.7GB used of 16.8 maximum space available, so a
quick calculation shows an average point is just under 1GB.

Keep in mind that if the volume approaches less than 15% free space, the
system will actively work to maintain this by reducing alloted space for
non-critical processes. Each point contains not only the system file
shadows, but also those of a user's files. If you have a lot of files,
then the corresponding restore points will be larger.

From your blog:

"Why should a Restore Point be much less than 2GB? Because restore points
ought to be only differences from the current system state, and if not
much is being installed, uninstalled, updated etc. the changes should be
relatively small."

That's not how vss works. It doesn't record only changes, that would be a
differential backup. System Restore is more akin to a "copy" of the system
at a point in time that can be replaced on demand. Each restore point is a
copy unto itself, and is not reliant on any other point, so each would be
expected to be appropriately sized.

--
Best of Luck,

Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
My thoughts http://rick-mvp.blogspot.com

"Julian" wrote in message
...
Thanks to Windows Mail for messing with the formatting... so much for the
"columns" - I've rearranged the text

And if you are interested in more about what the problem to be solved is
see http://berossus.blogspot.com/search/...stem%20Restore




--
Julian I-Do-Stuff

Some Vista stuff, but mostly just Stuff at http://berossus,blogspot.com

  #5 (permalink)  
Old February 29th 08, 12:41 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.general,microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
Mark[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 191
Default Vista HP Users - Need Some Info on YOUR System Restore for comparison...

Side note on the prior thread:

The "tool" provided (shadowexplorer) is basic in it's use, but I only
pointed to it because it does the one thing you needed:
What file(s) are eating up so much space that my Restore Points are
being deleted beyond the most current?
With that info you could exclude only that file from shadow copies. It
would be pointless to chase every file in the exclusion list and I never
intended that.

Since then, I've learned that this may also be a fruitless endeavor as
Shadow Copy would still make the backup, erase you other Restore Points for
any space needed, and THEN delete the file from the restore point (during
optimization) that was supposed to be excluded in the first place.

At my work, we disable shadow copies. Kind of pointless to have backups
of backups especially when you are paying for the maintenance of that
storage capability. We test the backup, extraction and restoration features
weekly. This makes me more prone to use backups as my means of restoration.

At home, I find System Restore points beyond one or two to be worthless.
If you go beyond one or two, you just don't know what you will end up with
for working applications if you are changing them frequently as I do. The
function Restore Previous Version, available by right-clicking a file or
folder is equally pointless except on the very rare occassion where you just
can't undo your editing of a picture or database any other way. (Imagine
restoring a single file within a driver to a previous version that makes use
of 50 files. What will it do now? Instead, you use the roll back function to
get all associated files to revert at the same time.) That said, I limit my
restore point area to 3GB. This lets me go back one or two iterations should
I ever need to and recover from a sudden disaster. (I haven't done this in
the years that the function has been available.) Instead, I accept that
going back beyond two iterations means a restoration of a backup. This is
apparently not an option in Home Premium unless you use third party
software.

Good luck!

"Julian" wrote in message
...
Thanks for the input Rick..

Re how VSS works - Doh! I see I confused myself g Clearly differential
backups w.r.t some nominal "full backup" in ShadowStorage wouldn't work as
the reference backup would eventually disappear (on a FIFO basis) and

render
the subsequent "backups" useless.... I had a momentary vision of
"differential" backups being relative to the current systems state... pity

I
didn't think a moment longer and realise that would be equally pointless -
I've acknowledged your point and amended my comments in the blog!

My Windows folder alone seems to be 9.79GB (!) (45k files in 8k folders),

so
I can't help wondering how Vista works out what needs to be "copied"

"Rick Rogers" wrote in message
...
FWIW

Size of C drive in GB...................................111GB (74GB

free)
Current Number of Restore Points...............18
Date of Oldest Restore Point (optional)........Feb 2, 2008
How old is your system (months) (optional)..14 months


System Restore set to default size of 15% of drive space. List
ShadowStorage shows 15.7GB used of 16.8 maximum space available, so a
quick calculation shows an average point is just under 1GB.

Keep in mind that if the volume approaches less than 15% free space, the
system will actively work to maintain this by reducing alloted space for
non-critical processes. Each point contains not only the system file
shadows, but also those of a user's files. If you have a lot of files,
then the corresponding restore points will be larger.

From your blog:

"Why should a Restore Point be much less than 2GB? Because restore

points
ought to be only differences from the current system state, and if not
much is being installed, uninstalled, updated etc. the changes should be
relatively small."

That's not how vss works. It doesn't record only changes, that would be

a
differential backup. System Restore is more akin to a "copy" of the

system
at a point in time that can be replaced on demand. Each restore point is

a
copy unto itself, and is not reliant on any other point, so each would

be
expected to be appropriately sized.

--
Best of Luck,

Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
My thoughts http://rick-mvp.blogspot.com

"Julian" wrote in message
...
Thanks to Windows Mail for messing with the formatting... so much for

the
"columns" - I've rearranged the text

And if you are interested in more about what the problem to be solved

is
see http://berossus.blogspot.com/search/...stem%20Restore




--
Julian I-Do-Stuff

Some Vista stuff, but mostly just Stuff at http://berossus,blogspot.com



  #6 (permalink)  
Old March 1st 08, 09:51 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.general,microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
Julian[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 77
Default Vista HP Users - Need Some Info on YOUR System Restore for comparison...

Just in case anyone else is thinking of responding, the issue is now
understood* and further data is not required.

Thank you Mark for your input.

*"One line" summary: Behaviour by design; System Restore relies on Shadow
Storage but shadows of all files are kept in all versions of Vista, but
unavailable as "previous versions" in Home Premium/Basic. The space used by
file shadow copies limits restore point history. There does not seem to be
any way to have only System Restore.

"Mark" wrote in message
...
Side note on the prior thread:

The "tool" provided (shadowexplorer) is basic in it's use, but I only
pointed to it because it does the one thing you needed:
What file(s) are eating up so much space that my Restore Points are
being deleted beyond the most current?
With that info you could exclude only that file from shadow copies. It
would be pointless to chase every file in the exclusion list and I never
intended that.

Since then, I've learned that this may also be a fruitless endeavor as
Shadow Copy would still make the backup, erase you other Restore Points
for
any space needed, and THEN delete the file from the restore point (during
optimization) that was supposed to be excluded in the first place.

At my work, we disable shadow copies. Kind of pointless to have backups
of backups especially when you are paying for the maintenance of that
storage capability. We test the backup, extraction and restoration
features
weekly. This makes me more prone to use backups as my means of
restoration.

At home, I find System Restore points beyond one or two to be
worthless.
If you go beyond one or two, you just don't know what you will end up with
for working applications if you are changing them frequently as I do. The
function Restore Previous Version, available by right-clicking a file or
folder is equally pointless except on the very rare occassion where you
just
can't undo your editing of a picture or database any other way. (Imagine
restoring a single file within a driver to a previous version that makes
use
of 50 files. What will it do now? Instead, you use the roll back function
to
get all associated files to revert at the same time.) That said, I limit
my
restore point area to 3GB. This lets me go back one or two iterations
should
I ever need to and recover from a sudden disaster. (I haven't done this in
the years that the function has been available.) Instead, I accept that
going back beyond two iterations means a restoration of a backup. This is
apparently not an option in Home Premium unless you use third party
software.

Good luck!

"Julian" wrote in message
...
Thanks for the input Rick..

Re how VSS works - Doh! I see I confused myself g Clearly differential
backups w.r.t some nominal "full backup" in ShadowStorage wouldn't work
as
the reference backup would eventually disappear (on a FIFO basis) and

render
the subsequent "backups" useless.... I had a momentary vision of
"differential" backups being relative to the current systems state...
pity

I
didn't think a moment longer and realise that would be equally
pointless -
I've acknowledged your point and amended my comments in the blog!

My Windows folder alone seems to be 9.79GB (!) (45k files in 8k folders),

so
I can't help wondering how Vista works out what needs to be "copied"

"Rick Rogers" wrote in message
...
FWIW

Size of C drive in GB...................................111GB (74GB

free)
Current Number of Restore Points...............18
Date of Oldest Restore Point (optional)........Feb 2, 2008
How old is your system (months) (optional)..14 months

System Restore set to default size of 15% of drive space. List
ShadowStorage shows 15.7GB used of 16.8 maximum space available, so a
quick calculation shows an average point is just under 1GB.

Keep in mind that if the volume approaches less than 15% free space,
the
system will actively work to maintain this by reducing alloted space
for
non-critical processes. Each point contains not only the system file
shadows, but also those of a user's files. If you have a lot of files,
then the corresponding restore points will be larger.

From your blog:

"Why should a Restore Point be much less than 2GB? Because restore

points
ought to be only differences from the current system state, and if not
much is being installed, uninstalled, updated etc. the changes should
be
relatively small."

That's not how vss works. It doesn't record only changes, that would be

a
differential backup. System Restore is more akin to a "copy" of the

system
at a point in time that can be replaced on demand. Each restore point
is

a
copy unto itself, and is not reliant on any other point, so each would

be
expected to be appropriately sized.

--
Best of Luck,

Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
My thoughts http://rick-mvp.blogspot.com

"Julian" wrote in message
...
Thanks to Windows Mail for messing with the formatting... so much for

the
"columns" - I've rearranged the text

And if you are interested in more about what the problem to be solved

is
see http://berossus.blogspot.com/search/...stem%20Restore




--
Julian I-Do-Stuff

Some Vista stuff, but mostly just Stuff at http://berossus,blogspot.com




--
Julian I-Do-Stuff

Some Vista stuff, but mostly just Stuff at http://berossus,blogspot.com

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright ©2004-2012 Vista Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.