![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I'm sure everyone knows that Windows Sidebar can potentially destroy the
amount of RAM that is available on your PC, but I'm having sort of an unusual problem with this. When Windows Sidebar is loaded, the amount of RAM that it occupies is about 20MB, which is certainly acceptable for me. However, after the course of 6 or so hours the RAM increases upwards of 120MB, and after 12 hours, nearly 200MB! This just doesn't seem right. I'm assuming Sidebar is stored some previous information via RAM, but I really can't see this information being necessary at all. Is there anyway I can put a cap on the amount of RAM that Sidebar uses? Or even some other method to reduce the RAM usage? Mike p.s. Current Sidebar Gadgets: Digital Clock 2.0 Now Playing Weather iStat Battery iStat Wireless iStat Memory Imp's Drive Info Gmail Checker I know it sounds like a lot, but like I said, when it is first loaded, it's only running at 20MB. |
|
|||
|
Hi Mike,
Start removing gadgets, one at a time, until the incremental increases stop. When that happens, you'll likely have spotted the culprit. The sidebar itself will not use much memory, but a poorly written gadget in it may not be releasing properly. -- Best of Luck, Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ Windows help - www.rickrogers.org My thoughts http://rick-mvp.blogspot.com "Mike123" wrote in message ... I'm sure everyone knows that Windows Sidebar can potentially destroy the amount of RAM that is available on your PC, but I'm having sort of an unusual problem with this. When Windows Sidebar is loaded, the amount of RAM that it occupies is about 20MB, which is certainly acceptable for me. However, after the course of 6 or so hours the RAM increases upwards of 120MB, and after 12 hours, nearly 200MB! This just doesn't seem right. I'm assuming Sidebar is stored some previous information via RAM, but I really can't see this information being necessary at all. Is there anyway I can put a cap on the amount of RAM that Sidebar uses? Or even some other method to reduce the RAM usage? Mike p.s. Current Sidebar Gadgets: Digital Clock 2.0 Now Playing Weather iStat Battery iStat Wireless iStat Memory Imp's Drive Info Gmail Checker I know it sounds like a lot, but like I said, when it is first loaded, it's only running at 20MB. |
|
|||
|
"Mike123" wrote in message
... I'm sure everyone knows that Windows Sidebar can potentially destroy the amount of RAM that is available on your PC, but I'm having sort of an unusual problem with this. When Windows Sidebar is loaded, the amount of RAM that it occupies is about 20MB, which is certainly acceptable for me. However, after the course of 6 or so hours the RAM increases upwards of 120MB, and after 12 hours, nearly 200MB! This just doesn't seem right. I'm assuming Sidebar is stored some previous information via RAM, but I really can't see this information being necessary at all. Is there anyway I can put a cap on the amount of RAM that Sidebar uses? Or even some other method to reduce the RAM usage? Mike p.s. Current Sidebar Gadgets: Digital Clock 2.0 Now Playing Weather iStat Battery iStat Wireless iStat Memory Imp's Drive Info Gmail Checker I know it sounds like a lot, but like I said, when it is first loaded, it's only running at 20MB. Gadgets like clocks, CPU and network use meters will use more resource than calendars and sticky notes.. -- Mike Hall - MVP How to construct a good post.. http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups.. http://support.microsoft.com/default...help&style=toc Mike's Window - My Blog.. http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx |
|
|||
|
After reading a bucket full of articles on SuperFetch, I am beginning to learn not to worry about memory issues. It's been a hard thing to do since I am use to running some memory hungry programs. My Vista laptop will start off at about 28% when first turned on and slowly climb up to the low 40% range on 4 gig of memory (3.560 gigs seen by OS). The slow increase in usage is just the nature of the beast no matter what is or is not running, so I have read. Frag -- defrag1720 |
|
|||
|
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 22:21:05 -0600, defrag1720
wrote: After reading a bucket full of articles on SuperFetch, I am beginning to learn not to worry about memory issues. It's been a hard thing to do since I am use to running some memory hungry programs. My Vista laptop will start off at about 28% when first turned on and slowly climb up to the low 40% range on 4 gig of memory (3.560 gigs seen by OS). The slow increase in usage is just the nature of the beast no matter what is or is not running, so I have read. Right. It's not any problem at all. In fact if you never get above 40% used, you have considerably more memory than you need. You would probably see no difference in performance with only 2GB. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
|
|||
|
Thanks a lot for all the info everyone. I did what Rick advised and removed
each gadget one by one to see what was causing the increase, and it was the Now Playing widget. I'm assuming that it stores information/artwork of previously played songs someplace, but after reading all the later posts, I'm not too concerned about it. Even when I'm running at full capacity with firefox, wmp, aim, word, and sidebar open, I rarely go over 50% RAM usage of my 2GB, so like I said, I'm not going to worry about it. Thanks again everyone. Mike "Ken Blake, MVP" wrote: On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 22:21:05 -0600, defrag1720 wrote: After reading a bucket full of articles on SuperFetch, I am beginning to learn not to worry about memory issues. It's been a hard thing to do since I am use to running some memory hungry programs. My Vista laptop will start off at about 28% when first turned on and slowly climb up to the low 40% range on 4 gig of memory (3.560 gigs seen by OS). The slow increase in usage is just the nature of the beast no matter what is or is not running, so I have read. Right. It's not any problem at all. In fact if you never get above 40% used, you have considerably more memory than you need. You would probably see no difference in performance with only 2GB. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
|
|||
|
"Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message news ![]() Right. It's not any problem at all. In fact if you never get above 40% used, you have considerably more memory than you need. You would probably see no difference in performance with only 2GB. I've got 6GB - Vista still tries to use it to the max. I'm sure there is a point for every user whereby Vista runs out of useful things to cache in memory, but with my usage habits, Vista always has a lot of useful stuff that it thinks I might need next. |
|
|||
|
Agree with Rick - probably this is the only way to spot the offenders. Though
I have never try this, I think task manager or the Sysinternals tools can't help as all the gadgets are under the sidebar.exe hood. Anyway, a super fast way to reclaim the memory without troubleshoot, is to exit and rerun sidebar. Right click the sidebar icon in taskbar and click exit, then in the Start Menu, do a quick search of 'sidebar' and run from there. All your notes, stocks and regional settings remain intact. MS did a 'great' job in developing sidebar, I am running 8 official, built-in gadgets namely calendar, currency, notes, stocks, weather and a few clocks. After I recycle sidebar this way, I reclaim 512MB, or 1/4 of my memory, phew ![]() "Rick Rogers" wrote: Hi Mike, Start removing gadgets, one at a time, until the incremental increases stop. When that happens, you'll likely have spotted the culprit. The sidebar itself will not use much memory, but a poorly written gadget in it may not be releasing properly. -- Best of Luck, Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ Windows help - www.rickrogers.org My thoughts http://rick-mvp.blogspot.com "Mike123" wrote in message ... I'm sure everyone knows that Windows Sidebar can potentially destroy the amount of RAM that is available on your PC, but I'm having sort of an unusual problem with this. When Windows Sidebar is loaded, the amount of RAM that it occupies is about 20MB, which is certainly acceptable for me. However, after the course of 6 or so hours the RAM increases upwards of 120MB, and after 12 hours, nearly 200MB! This just doesn't seem right. I'm assuming Sidebar is stored some previous information via RAM, but I really can't see this information being necessary at all. Is there anyway I can put a cap on the amount of RAM that Sidebar uses? Or even some other method to reduce the RAM usage? Mike p.s. Current Sidebar Gadgets: Digital Clock 2.0 Now Playing Weather iStat Battery iStat Wireless iStat Memory Imp's Drive Info Gmail Checker I know it sounds like a lot, but like I said, when it is first loaded, it's only running at 20MB. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|