![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
It's not a bug - it's a completely idiotic feature of Vista Home Premium
(and maybe Basic too) System Restore relies on Shadow Storage - which MS also uses to provide "previous version" file capabilities in higher-end Vista systems. However, Vista is in fact still taking copies of ALL your files - thereby eating up space that you might reasonably have thought was solely for System Restore points. Result: ShadowStorage fills up very quickly and your restore points are dumped. See http://berossus.blogspot.com/2008/02...ng-system.html and the links therein for what I eventually found on the web once I knew what to look for. It has been known about since last year apparently... Personally I am outraged at the lack of control over my own system, and specifically the completely useless System Restore capability that has resulted. MS should be ashamed. Very, very ashamed. But thanks to everyone who helped me track down the problem -- Julian I-Do-Stuff Some Vista stuff, but mostly just Stuff at http://berossus,blogspot.com |
|
|||
|
You should be ashamed for your idiotic outburst. You do not need more
restore points. Besides, you have control over the number of restore points you can have. Just add more storage, do more backups and eat your sh*it in the privacy of your home. Do not bring your lunacy in here. "Julian" wrote in message ... It's not a bug - it's a completely idiotic feature of Vista Home Premium (and maybe Basic too) System Restore relies on Shadow Storage - which MS also uses to provide "previous version" file capabilities in higher-end Vista systems. However, Vista is in fact still taking copies of ALL your files - thereby eating up space that you might reasonably have thought was solely for System Restore points. Result: ShadowStorage fills up very quickly and your restore points are dumped. See http://berossus.blogspot.com/2008/02...ng-system.html and the links therein for what I eventually found on the web once I knew what to look for. It has been known about since last year apparently... Personally I am outraged at the lack of control over my own system, and specifically the completely useless System Restore capability that has resulted. MS should be ashamed. Very, very ashamed. But thanks to everyone who helped me track down the problem -- Julian I-Do-Stuff Some Vista stuff, but mostly just Stuff at http://berossus,blogspot.com |
|
|||
|
yes of course ....
this is exactly as you say it... I understood this the very first time when vista was still in beta. On MACS you have to have an external drive for "TIME MACHINE" to work. Time machine is so far ahead of shadow copy thats its literally "from the future" pun intended! see how shadow copy should have been here http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/timemachine.html the way shadow copy is implemented in Vista is a problem of course (haven't found much in vista that is NOT a problem lol), because there is no way to chose the settings between restore points and old versions, or disabling only one of the 2 "functions" It's not a bug - it's a completely idiotic feature of Vista Home Premium (and maybe Basic too) Oh all versions of Vista create shadow copies.. but here is the even more idiotic thing= NOT ALL CAN ACCESS the older copies! LOL How dumb is that? Fortunalty there is a guy who wrote SHADOW EXPLORER a free tool, see here on how you can use it http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windo...windows-vista/ "Julian" wrote in message ... It's not a bug - it's a completely idiotic feature of Vista Home Premium (and maybe Basic too) System Restore relies on Shadow Storage - which MS also uses to provide "previous version" file capabilities in higher-end Vista systems. However, Vista is in fact still taking copies of ALL your files - thereby eating up space that you might reasonably have thought was solely for System Restore points. Result: ShadowStorage fills up very quickly and your restore points are dumped. See http://berossus.blogspot.com/2008/02...ng-system.html and the links therein for what I eventually found on the web once I knew what to look for. It has been known about since last year apparently... Personally I am outraged at the lack of control over my own system, and specifically the completely useless System Restore capability that has resulted. MS should be ashamed. Very, very ashamed. But thanks to everyone who helped me track down the problem -- Julian I-Do-Stuff Some Vista stuff, but mostly just Stuff at http://berossus,blogspot.com |
|
|||
|
"On the Bridge!" On@the,Bridge wrote in message ... yes of course .... this is exactly as you say it... I understood this the very first time when vista was still in beta. On MACS you have to have an external drive for "TIME MACHINE" to work. Time machine is so far ahead of shadow copy thats its literally "from the future" pun intended! see how shadow copy should have been here http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/timemachine.html A feature stolen from "windows". It is like www.memeo.com's backup solution for windows but not as good. Memeo has been around for a lot longer than timemachine and there are several alternatives that do similar things. There was even a real-time backup and file versioner for win98 but I forget what it was called. Some more of Apples "innovation". |
|
|||
|
Did you bother to read his post? You don't have a friggen clue as usual. You
are too busy sucking MSFT a hole to to understand anything. "alexB" wrote in message ... You should be ashamed for your idiotic outburst. You do not need more restore points. Besides, you have control over the number of restore points you can have. Just add more storage, do more backups and eat your sh*it in the privacy of your home. Do not bring your lunacy in here. "Julian" wrote in message ... It's not a bug - it's a completely idiotic feature of Vista Home Premium (and maybe Basic too) System Restore relies on Shadow Storage - which MS also uses to provide "previous version" file capabilities in higher-end Vista systems. However, Vista is in fact still taking copies of ALL your files - thereby eating up space that you might reasonably have thought was solely for System Restore points. Result: ShadowStorage fills up very quickly and your restore points are dumped. See http://berossus.blogspot.com/2008/02...ng-system.html and the links therein for what I eventually found on the web once I knew what to look for. It has been known about since last year apparently... Personally I am outraged at the lack of control over my own system, and specifically the completely useless System Restore capability that has resulted. MS should be ashamed. Very, very ashamed. But thanks to everyone who helped me track down the problem -- Julian I-Do-Stuff Some Vista stuff, but mostly just Stuff at http://berossus,blogspot.com |
|
|||
|
Your information is not even correct... And just to promote your
disappearing intellect blog... "Julian" wrote in message ... It's not a bug - it's a completely idiotic feature of Vista Home Premium (and maybe Basic too) System Restore relies on Shadow Storage - which MS also uses to provide "previous version" file capabilities in higher-end Vista systems. However, Vista is in fact still taking copies of ALL your files - thereby eating up space that you might reasonably have thought was solely for System Restore points. Result: ShadowStorage fills up very quickly and your restore points are dumped. See http://berossus.blogspot.com/2008/02...ng-system.html and the links therein for what I eventually found on the web once I knew what to look for. It has been known about since last year apparently... Personally I am outraged at the lack of control over my own system, and specifically the completely useless System Restore capability that has resulted. MS should be ashamed. Very, very ashamed. But thanks to everyone who helped me track down the problem -- Julian I-Do-Stuff Some Vista stuff, but mostly just Stuff at http://berossus,blogspot.com |
|
|||
|
So why are you giving the spammer more exposure by including his original
message? "Cameron Snyder" wrote in message ... Your information is not even correct... And just to promote your disappearing intellect blog... "Julian" wrote in message ... It's not a bug - it's a completely idiotic feature of Vista Home Premium (and maybe Basic too) |
|
|||
|
Excellent point. I was just in automaton mode. click-reply-send Thanks for
the slap. "Bob" wrote in message . .. So why are you giving the spammer more exposure by including his original message? "Cameron Snyder" wrote in message ... Your information is not even correct... And just to promote your disappearing intellect blog... "Julian" wrote in message ... It's not a bug - it's a completely idiotic feature of Vista Home Premium (and maybe Basic too) |
|
|||
|
"alexB" wrote in message ... You should be ashamed for your idiotic outburst. You do not need more restore points. Crap. How would YOU know how many restore points a person "needs" or "wants"? I got Vista SP1 off Windows update and expected the restore to previous to SP1 to be there. It wasn't. |
|
|||
|
"dennis@home" wrote in message ... "On the Bridge!" On@the,Bridge wrote in message ... yes of course .... this is exactly as you say it... I understood this the very first time when vista was still in beta. On MACS you have to have an external drive for "TIME MACHINE" to work. Time machine is so far ahead of shadow copy thats its literally "from the future" pun intended! see how shadow copy should have been here http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/timemachine.html A feature stolen from "windows". It is like www.memeo.com's backup solution for windows but not as good. Memeo has been around for a lot longer than timemachine and there are several alternatives that do similar things. There was even a real-time backup and file versioner for win98 but I forget what it was called. Some more of Apples "innovation". Let us not forget that Apple Macs first did multitasking in 1988, about 4 years after Commodore's Amiga was already doing it and with colour display, too, not the B&W Macs had back then but of course Mac users claim they had it first. |