![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Security and Windows Vista A forum for discussion on security issues with Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.security) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
For administrator-level accounts, for which the default behavior of build
5536 for running programs as administrator is to prompt for user confirmation but not require entry of a password, there are supposedly two separate goals: 1. To remind the user that he's about to run a program with which he could accidentally screw stuff up. 2. To prevent running processes from elevating their own privileges to administrator level without the user's knowledge or consent. For the first goal, the confirmation prompt is already redundant, because all such programs (and the option "run as administrator" for all other programs) already have shield icons next to them. Even in places where regular privileges are sufficient to view admin-level settings, the button to change those settings has a shield icon on it. So the user isn't going to start admin-level programs (or regular programs at admin level) without knowing that he's doing this. As an additional precaution and reminder, any program or dialog box which is running as administrator should have that shield icon in its title bar. Making the window frame be bright red instead of the regular pale blue wouldn't hurt either. But even without these additional reminders, the confirmation prompt is still already redundant. Of course, the first time a new user ever invokes one of these admin programs, the confirmation prompt should pop up once with an explanation of what the shield icon means, and the user can dismiss this prompt once and for all after checking a box saying "I understand what the shield icon means; don't bother me with this redundant prompt anymore." Now, for the second goal: allow the user, with his keyboard and mouse, to use the windows shell to start programs with shield icons without the system presenting any prompts, but if any process _other than the windows shell_ (for example, Microsoft Word while executing a macro virus) attempts to start an admin-level program or otherwise elevate its own privileges, then the system should display a confirmation prompt. Naturally, this requires that the system should prevent programs from being able to control or spoof the shell, but that's already taken for granted; programs can't (or certainly ought not be able to) move the mouse cursor at will, or generate mouse and keyboard events that appear to be coming from the shell. This way, the common and annoying prompts that administrator-level users encounter for things like setting the time, running the performance monitor, viewing all users' processes in Windows Task Manager, and doing numerous things in the control panel, are all eliminated, yet the user is aware when he's starting admin-level programs, and no admin-level programs are started or privileges elevated without his consent. So both goals 1 and 2 are accomplished without annoying the user. Of course, for non-admin users, the UAC password-entry dialog boxes are still necessary. |