|
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
August 28th 06, 07:43 PM
posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
|
|||
|
|||
Why only Performance Rating 1.0 ?
I dont think that rounding down to the lowest component is correct, because i
have the same amount of ram as Len, and my other components dont rank as high as his, and my total performance rating was 3... "Mark D. VandenBeg" wrote: Performance Rating is rounded down to the nearest whole number of the lowest rated component. In your case, this is your installed RAM which is rated a 1.8, and thus rounded down to 1. It is the "weakest link theory" and not a system average. "Len Norton" wrote in message ... I get the following values for my Performance Ratings - Processor - 3.1 Memory - 1.8 (1 GB) Hard Disk - 3.8 Graphics - 5.9 Gaming Graphics - 5.8 But only an overall rating of 1.0 Why? Regards, Len 
|
|
August 28th 06, 08:03 PM
posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why only Performance Rating 1.0 ?
What is your lowest rated component, Joe?
"Joe" wrote in message ... I dont think that rounding down to the lowest component is correct, because i have the same amount of ram as Len, and my other components dont rank as high as his, and my total performance rating was 3... "Mark D. VandenBeg" wrote: Performance Rating is rounded down to the nearest whole number of the lowest rated component. In your case, this is your installed RAM which is rated a 1.8, and thus rounded down to 1. It is the "weakest link theory" and not a system average. "Len Norton" wrote in message ... I get the following values for my Performance Ratings - Processor - 3.1 Memory - 1.8 (1 GB) Hard Disk - 3.8 Graphics - 5.9 Gaming Graphics - 5.8 But only an overall rating of 1.0 Why? Regards, Len
|
|
August 28th 06, 08:53 PM
posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why only Performance Rating 1.0 ?
Im not at home right now so i cant check, but i would imagine it would be a
1.8 for the ram, since i have a gig just like Len... it is lower end ram too so i cant imagine it would be rated any higher than his. "Mark D. VandenBerg" wrote: What is your lowest rated component, Joe? "Joe" wrote in message ... I dont think that rounding down to the lowest component is correct, because i have the same amount of ram as Len, and my other components dont rank as high as his, and my total performance rating was 3... "Mark D. VandenBeg" wrote: Performance Rating is rounded down to the nearest whole number of the lowest rated component. In your case, this is your installed RAM which is rated a 1.8, and thus rounded down to 1. It is the "weakest link theory" and not a system average. "Len Norton" wrote in message ... I get the following values for my Performance Ratings - Processor - 3.1 Memory - 1.8 (1 GB) Hard Disk - 3.8 Graphics - 5.9 Gaming Graphics - 5.8 But only an overall rating of 1.0 Why? Regards, Len
|
|
September 3rd 06, 02:46 PM
posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why only Performance Rating 1.0 ?
It doesn't only use the amount of RAM to rate the RAM, it also uses the
speed of the RAM. I have "only" one gigabyte of RAM and my RAM is rated at 4.5. Mic "Joe" wrote in message ... Im not at home right now so i cant check, but i would imagine it would be a 1.8 for the ram, since i have a gig just like Len... it is lower end ram too so i cant imagine it would be rated any higher than his. "Mark D. VandenBerg" wrote: What is your lowest rated component, Joe? "Joe" wrote in message ... I dont think that rounding down to the lowest component is correct, because i have the same amount of ram as Len, and my other components dont rank as high as his, and my total performance rating was 3... "Mark D. VandenBeg" wrote: Performance Rating is rounded down to the nearest whole number of the lowest rated component. In your case, this is your installed RAM which is rated a 1.8, and thus rounded down to 1. It is the "weakest link theory" and not a system average. "Len Norton" wrote in message ... I get the following values for my Performance Ratings - Processor - 3.1 Memory - 1.8 (1 GB) Hard Disk - 3.8 Graphics - 5.9 Gaming Graphics - 5.8 But only an overall rating of 1.0 Why? Regards, Len
|
Linear Mode
