|
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
October 12th 06, 09:57 PM
posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
|
|||
|
|||
Defragging Program Other Than Standard Vista
I used the defragger that came with Vista RC1. Not bad, but very slow (as
best as I can tell). Lacks visual way to see where process is. I have used Diskkeeper for years. They have v10 beta which works with Vista (at least RC1 which I have). I have downloaded that beta and just run it. Smooth, quick. Easy install. And visual monitoring for those who like colors. Interestingly, after install, it took the place of the standard Vista Defrag. So, for those who like Live OneCare, Diskkeeper will be the defrag default. Anyway, it seems to work very well, smooth, stable. http://www.diskeeper.com/defrag.asp Worth the try... -- Donald Mills 
|
|
October 13th 06, 10:04 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
|
|||
|
|||
|
Defragging Program Other Than Standard Vista
"Mills Architect" wrote: I used the defragger that came with Vista RC1. Not bad, but very slow it's not slow, but it runs at low I/O priority to avoid interfering with other disk activities.
|
Linear Mode
