![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance) |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hi all,
I'm running Vista RC1 on a PC with an Athlon XP 2GB chip and 512MB RAM. These specs more than meet the minimum needed for Vista, yet running only the operating system (literally nothing other than Windows's own processes) takes up over 300MB of my RAM. And thats when it's sitting there not doing anything. I'm already getting another 512MB RAM stick for my PC, but is there anything else that can be done to optimize Vista and free up some more memory? |
|
|||
|
Vista uses a different memory management than XP. Don't worry about how
much it reports as being in use. Vista will use as much memory as you throw at it, but it will also release what it as cached much better than XP. That being said you should still go ahead with getting the additional RAM. You'll find that Vista runs better on 1 GB than it does on 512mb. "Bort" wrote in message ... Hi all, I'm running Vista RC1 on a PC with an Athlon XP 2GB chip and 512MB RAM. These specs more than meet the minimum needed for Vista, yet running only the operating system (literally nothing other than Windows's own processes) takes up over 300MB of my RAM. And thats when it's sitting there not doing anything. I'm already getting another 512MB RAM stick for my PC, but is there anything else that can be done to optimize Vista and free up some more memory? |
|
|||
|
In that case, how come I get tons of lag when I play games? It's always
loading lag, never graphics or connection lag. These games worked fine under XP, and would work fine on Vista if it wasn't for this loading lag I get constantly. Thanks for your response Mark, Bort "Mark W Scheidell" wrote: Vista uses a different memory management than XP. Don't worry about how much it reports as being in use. Vista will use as much memory as you throw at it, but it will also release what it as cached much better than XP. That being said you should still go ahead with getting the additional RAM. You'll find that Vista runs better on 1 GB than it does on 512mb. "Bort" wrote in message ... Hi all, I'm running Vista RC1 on a PC with an Athlon XP 2GB chip and 512MB RAM. These specs more than meet the minimum needed for Vista, yet running only the operating system (literally nothing other than Windows's own processes) takes up over 300MB of my RAM. And thats when it's sitting there not doing anything. I'm already getting another 512MB RAM stick for my PC, but is there anything else that can be done to optimize Vista and free up some more memory? |
|
|||
|
You need sufficient RAM to load, and hold the graphics files for the game
you are playing. Look to the readme file, or the outside of the box, to find out what the minimum recommendations are. Then, believe them. Many newer game load massive files into memory. 512 meg of RAM just may not cut it. -- Regards, Richard Urban Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User (For email, remove the obvious from my address) Quote from George Ankner: If you knew as much as you think you know, You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew! "Bort" wrote in message ... In that case, how come I get tons of lag when I play games? It's always loading lag, never graphics or connection lag. These games worked fine under XP, and would work fine on Vista if it wasn't for this loading lag I get constantly. Thanks for your response Mark, Bort "Mark W Scheidell" wrote: Vista uses a different memory management than XP. Don't worry about how much it reports as being in use. Vista will use as much memory as you throw at it, but it will also release what it as cached much better than XP. That being said you should still go ahead with getting the additional RAM. You'll find that Vista runs better on 1 GB than it does on 512mb. "Bort" wrote in message ... Hi all, I'm running Vista RC1 on a PC with an Athlon XP 2GB chip and 512MB RAM. These specs more than meet the minimum needed for Vista, yet running only the operating system (literally nothing other than Windows's own processes) takes up over 300MB of my RAM. And thats when it's sitting there not doing anything. I'm already getting another 512MB RAM stick for my PC, but is there anything else that can be done to optimize Vista and free up some more memory? |
|
|||
|
You know, it is Windows, it eats memory raw. Just give it what it wants, its
cheap these days and you will do yourself a big pleasure with it as well. Put in as much as you can. Right now i have one gig and it uses 850mb. Still it is very fast. If i have XP running with 850mb in use, with every click on the mouse i can get a cup of coffee. Anyway, you get the point. Franky "Bort" wrote: Hi all, I'm running Vista RC1 on a PC with an Athlon XP 2GB chip and 512MB RAM. These specs more than meet the minimum needed for Vista, yet running only the operating system (literally nothing other than Windows's own processes) takes up over 300MB of my RAM. And thats when it's sitting there not doing anything. I'm already getting another 512MB RAM stick for my PC, but is there anything else that can be done to optimize Vista and free up some more memory? |
|
|||
|
I didn't know that anyone had that little RAM any more. I'm running on 6GB
and have had a minumum of 2GB (and 4GB on most) on every system I've used the last 6 years or so. RAM is dirt cheap and has been for a long time, why suffer through the agony of Windows on anything less then 2GB? Regards, Skon "Bort" wrote in message ... Hi all, I'm running Vista RC1 on a PC with an Athlon XP 2GB chip and 512MB RAM. These specs more than meet the minimum needed for Vista, yet running only the operating system (literally nothing other than Windows's own processes) takes up over 300MB of my RAM. And thats when it's sitting there not doing anything. I'm already getting another 512MB RAM stick for my PC, but is there anything else that can be done to optimize Vista and free up some more memory? |
|
|||
|
What OS uses 6GB of ram
Or may I rephrase it "What OS can utilize 6GB of ram?" NIK -- Remove nospam for personal reply if responding via newsgroup. "skon" wrote in message ... I didn't know that anyone had that little RAM any more. I'm running on 6GB and have had a minumum of 2GB (and 4GB on most) on every system I've used the last 6 years or so. RAM is dirt cheap and has been for a long time, why suffer through the agony of Windows on anything less then 2GB? Regards, Skon "Bort" wrote in message ... Hi all, I'm running Vista RC1 on a PC with an Athlon XP 2GB chip and 512MB RAM. These specs more than meet the minimum needed for Vista, yet running only the operating system (literally nothing other than Windows's own processes) takes up over 300MB of my RAM. And thats when it's sitting there not doing anything. I'm already getting another 512MB RAM stick for my PC, but is there anything else that can be done to optimize Vista and free up some more memory? |
|
|||
|
No kidding! I'm surprised! (just kidding!)
Vista will use up everything that you can throw at it. Hardware development doesn't seem to have caught up with it yet. I'd suggest that you adjust your display properties downward, and then use the Control Panel...System applet to adjust your PC for performance. Turning off the Aero theme should also help. - John "niknik1971" wrote: What OS uses 6GB of ram Or may I rephrase it "What OS can utilize 6GB of ram?" NIK -- Remove nospam for personal reply if responding via newsgroup. "skon" wrote in message ... I didn't know that anyone had that little RAM any more. I'm running on 6GB and have had a minumum of 2GB (and 4GB on most) on every system I've used the last 6 years or so. RAM is dirt cheap and has been for a long time, why suffer through the agony of Windows on anything less then 2GB? Regards, Skon "Bort" wrote in message ... Hi all, I'm running Vista RC1 on a PC with an Athlon XP 2GB chip and 512MB RAM. These specs more than meet the minimum needed for Vista, yet running only the operating system (literally nothing other than Windows's own processes) takes up over 300MB of my RAM. And thats when it's sitting there not doing anything. I'm already getting another 512MB RAM stick for my PC, but is there anything else that can be done to optimize Vista and free up some more memory? |
|
|||
|
Oops - didn't see the rest of the post!
While there are "minimums" recommended for the use of Vista, I've found that it will run quite well on only 512 mB of RAM (a bit slow - but not excruciatingly so) if you do the "tweaks" required to optimize the system for performance. Since Vista is a huge leap forward for graphics, it makes sense that adjusting the graphics stuff downwards will help keep your RAM free. In particular the areas that I mentioned in my previous post will help (I used them on a Toshiba M45 laptop with 512 mB of RAM back in June). Also, keep an eye on your startups and on your running processes. Trimming them back will save on memory usage. You may have to eliminate some of the "eye candy" (such as the Sidebar), but the performance increase will make your experience much easier to deal with. FWIW - I've got a P4 3.0 gHz system with a nVidia 7800 GS vid card and 2 gB of RAM - and Vista doesn't like the processor or the vid card (even though it works well). So, I'm shopping for new chipsets (975x or 680i SLI) for my new Core 2 Duo system. - John "niknik1971" wrote: What OS uses 6GB of ram Or may I rephrase it "What OS can utilize 6GB of ram?" NIK -- Remove nospam for personal reply if responding via newsgroup. "skon" wrote in message ... I didn't know that anyone had that little RAM any more. I'm running on 6GB and have had a minumum of 2GB (and 4GB on most) on every system I've used the last 6 years or so. RAM is dirt cheap and has been for a long time, why suffer through the agony of Windows on anything less then 2GB? Regards, Skon "Bort" wrote in message ... Hi all, I'm running Vista RC1 on a PC with an Athlon XP 2GB chip and 512MB RAM. These specs more than meet the minimum needed for Vista, yet running only the operating system (literally nothing other than Windows's own processes) takes up over 300MB of my RAM. And thats when it's sitting there not doing anything. I'm already getting another 512MB RAM stick for my PC, but is there anything else that can be done to optimize Vista and free up some more memory? |
|
|||
|
I have the same setup AthlonXP 2600 and 512 RAM and Vista is using 311mb of
my 512 mb just sitting idle. I'm not sure 1gig will be enough. everything is super slow and forget about any 3D apps. "Bort" wrote in message ... Hi all, I'm running Vista RC1 on a PC with an Athlon XP 2GB chip and 512MB RAM. These specs more than meet the minimum needed for Vista, yet running only the operating system (literally nothing other than Windows's own processes) takes up over 300MB of my RAM. And thats when it's sitting there not doing anything. I'm already getting another 512MB RAM stick for my PC, but is there anything else that can be done to optimize Vista and free up some more memory? |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|