![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Dr Teeth wrote:
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 17:38:03 -0800, "Kerry Brown" *a*m wrote: Much of the fashion for using registry cleaners stems from the days of win9x. Back then you needed a registry cleaner to keep your computer running. The way the registry is used with NT versions of Windows this is no longer needed. You're totally wrong about that. WinXP is just as apt to develop a bloated registry as any of the legacy OSes. The biggest issue that leads to this condition has nothing to do with whether the current OSes are coded to maintain better internal hygiene or not. The problem is poorly and incompletely coded application uninstall routines, which often leave orphaned entries throughout the registry. Nothing but a decent registry cleaner is going to find and eliminate them. JV16 was rated as among the best registry cleaning apps based on its ability to find the most registry errors and fix them on the initial run. The competition kept finding more "errors" every time they were re-run, which shows they are not capable of doing the job properly. I've been using various registry cleaning apps for years, and have plenty of experience with them. Bad ones exist, and can do damage. JV16 is not one of them. Take that to the bank. |