![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Networking with Windows Vista Networking issues and questions with Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I answered the same question on server networking. this is the copy.
This could be the binding order issue. This post may have more details. Fixed: Vista VPN name resolution issue However, we can't use the office servers using host name or FQDN. All XP computers don't have this issue. All XP and Vista clients use the same VPN client ... http://www.chicagotech.net/netforums...88902 b4d4772 -- Bob Lin, MS-MVP, MCSE & CNE Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on http://www.ChicagoTech.net How to Setup Windows, Network, VPN & Remote Access on http://www.HowToNetworking.com "David L. Crow" wrote in message ... It appears that in Vista, the DNS server(s) for a PPP connection are always favored over those from other connection regardless of the service provider order defined. This can be verified by using the nslookup command without any arguments and looking at the Default Server that is displayed. This is different than XP. Is there any way to change this? -- David L. Crow |
|
|||
|
Robert L. (MS-MVP) wrote:
I answered the same question on server networking. this is the copy. I messed up posting to that group and tried to cancel, but most servers don't honor cancel requests. Sorry for the noise. This could be the binding order issue. This post may have more details. Thanks! By modifying the order of the values of HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Servic es\Tcpip\Linkage\Bind, I got what I wanted. -- David L. Crow Texas! It's like a whole other country. |
|
|||
|
Thank you for the update.
-- Bob Lin, MS-MVP, MCSE & CNE Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on http://www.ChicagoTech.net How to Setup Windows, Network, VPN & Remote Access on http://www.HowToNetworking.com "David L. Crow" wrote in message ... Robert L. (MS-MVP) wrote: I answered the same question on server networking. this is the copy. I messed up posting to that group and tried to cancel, but most servers don't honor cancel requests. Sorry for the noise. This could be the binding order issue. This post may have more details. Thanks! By modifying the order of the values of HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Servic es\Tcpip\Linkage\Bind, I got what I wanted. -- David L. Crow Texas! It's like a whole other country. |
|
|||
|
By modifying the order of the values of
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Servic es\Tcpip\Linkage\Bind, I got what I wanted. Apparently, I spoke too soon. While the "Default Server" displayed by the nslookup command immediately changed as did the order of adapters in ipconfig output, no TCP/IP clients (e.g. Thunderbird, Firefox, telnet, etc.) recognized the change. Even after an ipconfig /flushdns and restarting the client. I thought maybe a reboot was needed, but when I did that, the Linkage \Bind order went back to what it was previously. So I am now back to square one and need to find a way to have Vista not prioritize a PPP DNS server over one from a ethernet or wireless connection. -- David L. Crow |