A Windows Vista forum. Vista Banter

Welcome to Vista Banter.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

Go Back   Home » Vista Banter forum » Microsoft Windows Vista » Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance)

Imaging software



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old June 6th 08, 08:31 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.general,microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
C.B.[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 543
Default Imaging software

Has anyone had any experiences, good or bad, with any of the following
imaging software? I would appreciate any information you can give me.
To the best of my knowledge they are all compatible with Vista. I've
researched all of them but have no experience with any of them. I am
currently using Acronis True Image 11.

Active Disk Image 3.1
Retrospect Express HD
Image for Windows
Paragon Exact Image
Paragon Hard Disk Manager
ShadowProtect 3.2
Norton Ghost 14

C.B.


--
It is the responsibility and duty of everyone to help the underprivileged
and unfortunate among us.

  #2 (permalink)  
Old June 6th 08, 11:20 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.general,microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
Hobbes[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 369
Default Imaging software

Have to agree Albright...The restoration never works.
Back up data....data is what is lost, not the OS

--
Hobbes
Tiger Extraordinaire/ TDTK, QZ,MissAK
"Adam Albright" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 16:31:16 -0400, "C.B."
wrote:

Has anyone had any experiences, good or bad, with any of the
following
imaging software? I would appreciate any information you can give me.
To the best of my knowledge they are all compatible with Vista. I've
researched all of them but have no experience with any of them. I am
currently using Acronis True Image 11.

Active Disk Image 3.1
Retrospect Express HD
Image for Windows
Paragon Exact Image
Paragon Hard Disk Manager
ShadowProtect 3.2
Norton Ghost 14

C.B.


I wouldn't recommend or use any disk imaging software, period. I tried
a early version of Norton's Ghost years ago. Thankfully I tested only
a smaller hard drive I had separate backup for. It said it made a
successful backup of this drive but when I tried to restore things it
failed. THAT is a serious issues with all imaging software. They may
work, but you won't find out IF they worked until you need them. If
they fail then, you're up the creek without a paddle.

I back up the old fashioned way. I simply make multiple copies of MY
data files. That's it. If I even need to reinstall the system or some
software I'll cross that bridge if and when I need to.


  #3 (permalink)  
Old June 7th 08, 12:36 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.general,microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
Dave T.[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 325
Default Imaging software

Adam Albright wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 16:31:16 -0400, "C.B."
wrote:

Has anyone had any experiences, good or bad, with any of the following
imaging software? I would appreciate any information you can give me.
To the best of my knowledge they are all compatible with Vista. I've
researched all of them but have no experience with any of them. I am
currently using Acronis True Image 11.

Active Disk Image 3.1
Retrospect Express HD
Image for Windows
Paragon Exact Image
Paragon Hard Disk Manager
ShadowProtect 3.2
Norton Ghost 14

C.B.


I wouldn't recommend or use any disk imaging software, period. I tried
a early version of Norton's Ghost years ago. Thankfully I tested only
a smaller hard drive I had separate backup for. It said it made a
successful backup of this drive but when I tried to restore things it
failed. THAT is a serious issues with all imaging software. They may
work, but you won't find out IF they worked until you need them. If
they fail then, you're up the creek without a paddle.

I back up the old fashioned way. I simply make multiple copies of MY
data files. That's it. If I even need to reinstall the system or some
software I'll cross that bridge if and when I need to.

Adam, what you say makes perfect sense. The only thing that an image
resto does is save an awful lot of time and work. I did a full disk
restore after a virus problem using Ghost 9 and it worked out pretty
well. That was a number of years ago, but I don't recall any problems
completing the process.

--
Dave T.


"Your attitude serves as a lens through which you see life, and it's
best when that lens is focused on the positive possibilities." - Ralph
Marston
  #4 (permalink)  
Old June 7th 08, 03:11 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.general,microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
C.B.[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 543
Default Imaging software



"Dave T." wrote in message
...
Adam Albright wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 16:31:16 -0400, "C.B."
wrote:

Has anyone had any experiences, good or bad, with any of the
following imaging software? I would appreciate any information you can
give me.
To the best of my knowledge they are all compatible with Vista. I've
researched all of them but have no experience with any of them. I am
currently using Acronis True Image 11.

Active Disk Image 3.1
Retrospect Express HD
Image for Windows
Paragon Exact Image
Paragon Hard Disk Manager
ShadowProtect 3.2
Norton Ghost 14

C.B.


I wouldn't recommend or use any disk imaging software, period. I tried
a early version of Norton's Ghost years ago. Thankfully I tested only
a smaller hard drive I had separate backup for. It said it made a
successful backup of this drive but when I tried to restore things it
failed. THAT is a serious issues with all imaging software. They may
work, but you won't find out IF they worked until you need them. If
they fail then, you're up the creek without a paddle. I back up the old
fashioned way. I simply make multiple copies of MY
data files. That's it. If I even need to reinstall the system or some
software I'll cross that bridge if and when I need to.

Adam, what you say makes perfect sense. The only thing that an image resto
does is save an awful lot of time and work. I did a full disk restore
after a virus problem using Ghost 9 and it worked out pretty well. That
was a number of years ago, but I don't recall any problems completing the
process.

--
Dave T.


"Your attitude serves as a lens through which you see life, and it's best
when that lens is focused on the positive possibilities." - Ralph Marston


I've done several restores using Acronis True Image 11 and they all
went extremely well. I've restored from the Acronis Secure Zone, my first
external HD, my second external HD (the backup was actually a copy {Copy to
Folder} I made from my first HD) and from the bootable recovery disk I made.
No problems with any of them.
I always validate the backups upon completion and occasionally do a
restore just to make sure everything is working as it should. I do full disk
backups only. The backups take appx. 15 minutes and the restores 20-30
minutes, depending on where they came from.
It sure beats the hell out of reinstalling the OS, updates and all the
third party software. By the way, nice sig.

C.B.


--
It is the responsibility and duty of everyone to help the underprivileged
and unfortunate among us.


  #5 (permalink)  
Old June 7th 08, 04:12 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.general,microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
Ed.[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 30
Default Imaging software

The best I have found and use are the products from
http://www.terabyteunlimited.com/index.htm

I like the Image For DOS. All of the products you can try as they give you a
trial period. You can't go wrong and don't lose no money and see if you like
them. I have been using Bing, Image for DOS and Image for Windows and have
tried Image for Linux. Like I said I do mainly use Image for DOS (IFD).You
don't have to have Linux to use it. Some use it cause it has support for
more external devices and also provides more speed in some cases.


"C.B." wrote in message
...
Has anyone had any experiences, good or bad, with any of the following
imaging software? I would appreciate any information you can give me.
To the best of my knowledge they are all compatible with Vista. I've
researched all of them but have no experience with any of them. I am
currently using Acronis True Image 11.

Active Disk Image 3.1
Retrospect Express HD
Image for Windows
Paragon Exact Image
Paragon Hard Disk Manager
ShadowProtect 3.2
Norton Ghost 14

C.B.


--
It is the responsibility and duty of everyone to help the underprivileged
and unfortunate among us.


  #6 (permalink)  
Old June 7th 08, 04:41 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.general,microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
C.B.[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 543
Default Imaging software

Thank you for the reply. I appreciate it.

C.B.


"Ed." wrote in message
...
The best I have found and use are the products from
http://www.terabyteunlimited.com/index.htm

I like the Image For DOS. All of the products you can try as they give you
a trial period. You can't go wrong and don't lose no money and see if you
like them. I have been using Bing, Image for DOS and Image for Windows and
have tried Image for Linux. Like I said I do mainly use Image for DOS
(IFD).You don't have to have Linux to use it. Some use it cause it has
support for more external devices and also provides more speed in some
cases.


"C.B." wrote in message
...
Has anyone had any experiences, good or bad, with any of the
following imaging software? I would appreciate any information you can
give me.
To the best of my knowledge they are all compatible with Vista. I've
researched all of them but have no experience with any of them. I am
currently using Acronis True Image 11.

Active Disk Image 3.1
Retrospect Express HD
Image for Windows
Paragon Exact Image
Paragon Hard Disk Manager
ShadowProtect 3.2
Norton Ghost 14

C.B.


--
It is the responsibility and duty of everyone to help the underprivileged
and unfortunate among us.


  #7 (permalink)  
Old June 7th 08, 02:02 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.general,microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
Bill Anderson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 55
Default Imaging software

C.B. wrote:


"Dave T." wrote in message
...
Adam Albright wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 16:31:16 -0400, "C.B."
wrote:

Has anyone had any experiences, good or bad, with any of the
following imaging software? I would appreciate any information you
can give me.
To the best of my knowledge they are all compatible with Vista.
I've researched all of them but have no experience with any of them.
I am currently using Acronis True Image 11.

Active Disk Image 3.1
Retrospect Express HD
Image for Windows
Paragon Exact Image
Paragon Hard Disk Manager
ShadowProtect 3.2
Norton Ghost 14

C.B.

I wouldn't recommend or use any disk imaging software, period. I tried
a early version of Norton's Ghost years ago. Thankfully I tested only
a smaller hard drive I had separate backup for. It said it made a
successful backup of this drive but when I tried to restore things it
failed. THAT is a serious issues with all imaging software. They may
work, but you won't find out IF they worked until you need them. If
they fail then, you're up the creek without a paddle. I back up the
old fashioned way. I simply make multiple copies of MY
data files. That's it. If I even need to reinstall the system or some
software I'll cross that bridge if and when I need to.

Adam, what you say makes perfect sense. The only thing that an image
resto does is save an awful lot of time and work. I did a full disk
restore after a virus problem using Ghost 9 and it worked out pretty
well. That was a number of years ago, but I don't recall any problems
completing the process.

--
Dave T.


"Your attitude serves as a lens through which you see life, and it's
best when that lens is focused on the positive possibilities." - Ralph
Marston


I've done several restores using Acronis True Image 11 and they all
went extremely well. I've restored from the Acronis Secure Zone, my
first external HD, my second external HD (the backup was actually a copy
{Copy to Folder} I made from my first HD) and from the bootable recovery
disk I made. No problems with any of them.
I always validate the backups upon completion and occasionally do a
restore just to make sure everything is working as it should. I do full
disk backups only. The backups take appx. 15 minutes and the restores
20-30 minutes, depending on where they came from.
It sure beats the hell out of reinstalling the OS, updates and all
the third party software. By the way, nice sig.

C.B.



I use Norton Ghost 12 to back up my partitions. Currently I'm
quadruple-booting two XP Pros (one for testing and the other for regular
use), a 32-bit Vista, and a 64-bit Vista. All four partitions are on one
500 gigabyte HDD (with plenty of room for more partitions left over),
and all four are backed up on a separate HDD. I keep no data in the
boot partitions -- all data files, email files, photos, etc etc are on
yet another HDD. That way I can replace a boot partition any time I
want without worrying about losing data. I also have the partition with
the data files backed up on a removable drive, and just to be sure, I've
got a second set of backups sitting safely on a HDD in a drawer across
the room.

The other day I foolishly downloaded something dicey and I got a trojan
warning on the 32-bit Vista installation. I was pretty sure Avast
caught it, but just to be sure I *wiped* my Vista 32-bit partition and
used Ghost to recover it from a backup file. Worked great, took very
little time, all my applications are functioning fine, and there's no
hint that a virus/trojan has ever touched the Vista installation.

Also, I wipe and restore the XP test partition at least once a month,
usually more often, as I try out various software. When I've finished
playing around, I just recover the partition to a pristine state -- no
strange files lying around, no useless entries in the registry, etc. I
keep the test partition small -- about 10 gigabytes -- so I can recover
it in just a few minutes whenever I want.

Ghost 12 works great for this. Easy as can be and very dependable.

--
Bill Anderson

I am the Mighty Favog
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright ©2004-2012 Vista Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.