|
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
June 8th 08, 08:27 PM
posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
|
|||
|
|||
Bad Frequency Test
I did a frequency test using -Intel® Processor Identification Utility- to my Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 2.5Gz Processor but I don't think the results were good  . I got this:[image: http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/3...082303em6.gif] Why was the expected values very less than the reported vales?:cry: -- looi76 
|
|
June 9th 08, 02:08 PM
posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bad Frequency Test
Hi looi76,
This could be due to a feature known as 'EIST' or 'Enhanced Intel Speedstep'. See the link below for further details and explanation. Dwarf http://www.intel.com/support/process.../CS-028855.htm "looi76" wrote: I did a frequency test using -IntelĀ® Processor Identification Utility- to my Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 2.5Gz Processor but I don't think the results were good . I got this:[image: http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/3...082303em6.gif] Why was the expected values very less than the reported vales?:cry: -- looi76
|
Linear Mode
