![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Networking with Windows Vista Networking issues and questions with Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Is there any way to use offline files to enhance performance when accessing a
network share? I'm in the scenario of regularly accessing a file structure with a lot of both small and large files, and this being done over the network is killing performance. The structure is mostly read but there is some writing as well. Things are a lot faster if I put the file structure on local disk, but this is data that I would really like to have on the server... So, my questions a 1) Can I benefit from an "offline files" cache while still being online so I get (transparently) mostly local disk accesses? 2) Are there big differences in performance for network share access and/or offline files caching with different combinations of Windows OS's? My environment looks like this: XP (client) --100mbit-- Vista 64 (server) (Server doesn't have SP1 yet, and network will be upgraded to gigabit soon.) I realize this is not the optimal setup, but are the potential improvements (Vista offline files and SMB2) big enough to warrant the pain in reconfiguring everything? And would a real Windows server OS make any difference here? Best regards Mike Wilson |