Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
Hardware and Windows Vista Hardware issues in relation to Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.hardware_devices) |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
Slow Seagate HD
Hi All,
I have 3 SATA HD 150GB from western digital and 1 750GTB from Seagate. That Seagate HD takes much more times to process files like copy or some other transactions. While in the other HDs it is instantly. All HD are internal. Is that could be a HD problem or a Vista thing? I am using Vista Ultimate 64 bits with 8GB of memory. I ran a Defrag and CHKDSK on that HD and even replaced a different SATA cable but still having the same problem. Is there any limitation of the hd space that vista can process as well? Any idea? Thanks, Joe |
|
|||
Slow Seagate HD
You are nowhere near any limitations with x64 Vista. Run Seagate's drive
checking utility against the drive to see if it is defective. Eliminate that possibility first. You can download the software from Seagate. "JoeP" wrote in message ... Hi All, I have 3 SATA HD 150GB from western digital and 1 750GTB from Seagate. That Seagate HD takes much more times to process files like copy or some other transactions. While in the other HDs it is instantly. All HD are internal. Is that could be a HD problem or a Vista thing? I am using Vista Ultimate 64 bits with 8GB of memory. I ran a Defrag and CHKDSK on that HD and even replaced a different SATA cable but still having the same problem. Is there any limitation of the hd space that vista can process as well? Any idea? Thanks, Joe |