Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
Hardware and Windows Vista Hardware issues in relation to Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.hardware_devices) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
upgrade c: from pata to sata with vista ultimate 64bit upgrade dis
For those that are too lazy to click on the link I provided:
"How to Clean Install Windows Vista with Upgrade Media When I began inquiring into various Windows Vista installation options late last year, Microsoft and its representative grew quiet and seemed to begin selectively answering my questions. Previously, Microsoft had said that Vista's upgrade experience would be similar to that of XP: You'd be able to perform an in-place upgrade using the Vista Upgrade media or, with qualifying media (i.e. a Windows 2000 or XP CD-ROM), you could use the Upgrade media to perform a clean install. When rumors began surfacing that Vista Upgrade versions would not support clean installs, however, a veil of silence descended over Redmond. These rumors grew louder as Vista's broad release date of January 30, 2007 approached. Then, finally, Microsoft dropped the bomb: The weekend before Vista's launch, the company quietly posted a support note on its Web site ominously titled Upgrade installation keys are blocked when you start from the Windows Vista DVD, Microsoft explains: "Windows Vista does not check upgrade compliance. You cannot use an upgrade key to perform a clean installation of Windows Vista." The support note recommends that users who run into this issue first install a compliant version of Windows first (i.e. Windows 2000, XP, or Vista) and then run Setup from within that install, upgrading the OS to the new version. Or, you could simply purchase a Full Product license. Hey, there's some great advice. The reaction in the Windows community was predictably swift and damning. Clearly, Microsoft was disabling this previously handy option in order to inconvenience users (at best) or force them to spend more money on a Full product version (at worst). Either way, the company had pulled a fast one, silently taking away a feature we had all come to know and expect. Well, it turns out that Windows Vista Upgrade media can indeed be used to perform a clean install of the operating system, at least sort of. Using an undocumented workaround which I first revealed in WinInfo Daily UPDATE earlier this week, you can fool any Upgrade version of Windows Vista into installing itself on a PC without upgrading a previous OS install. Here's how it works. Step 1: Install Windows Vista Boot your PC with the Windows Vista Upgrade DVD. After the preliminary loading screen, click the Install Now button to trigger Vista Setup. In the next screen, you normally enter your product key. However, there's a little-known trick in Windows Vista Setup whereby you can simply skip this phase and use the install media (Upgrade or Full, any version) to perform a clean install of virtually any Vista product edition. What you do is leave the Product Key field blank, deselect the option titled "Automatically activate Windows when I'm online," and then click Next. Vista Setup will ask you whether you would like to enter your Product Key before continuing. Click No. In the next Setup screen, you'll be presented with a list of the Windows Vista product editions you can install. This list may vary from locale to locale, but in the US, you'll see Vista Home Basic, Home Premium, Business, Ultimate, and some N editions. Choose the product edition you actually own. You'll be asked to verify that you've chosen the correct version. Do so to continue past the End User License Agreement (EULA) screen. In the next screen, you select the type of install. Choose Custom (Advanced) instead of Upgrade. Next, you choose the partition to which to install Windows Vista. If you need to format the disk, select the Drive options (advanced) option to do so and then continue. Now, Setup copies the Vista install image to your PC, expands it, and installs Windows. This phase of Setup should take about 15 to 20 minutes and trigger at least one reboot. When Vista is installed, you'll step through the penultimate phase of Setup in which you enter, in succession, your user name and password, computer name, and the date, time, and time zone. Then Setup runs its final task, a performance test that could take about 5 minutes. If everything goes well, and you're running fairly modern hardware, you should hit the Welcome screen and, after logging on, the new Vista desktop less than 30 minutes after you began this process. Step 2: Upgrade What you've installed is decidedly temporary. You've got 30 days during which you can run this non-activated version of Windows Vista. If you try to activate Windows now, it will fail, because you've performed a clean install of Vista and you only have an Upgrade product key. What to do, what to do? If you read Microsoft's support note carefully, you will have seen that the Upgrade versions of Vista support upgrading from "a compliant version of Windows, such as Windows Vista, Microsoft Windows XP, or Microsoft Windows 2000." Well, you just installed Windows Vista, so why not just upgrade from this install? That's right: You're going to upgrade the non-activated clean install you just performed, which will provide you with a version of the OS that you can, in fact, activate. To do this, just open Computer and double click on the icon for the DVD drive that contains the Vista Upgrade media. Run Setup again, this time from within Vista. Choose Install Now, and then "Do not get the latest updates for installation" in the next screen. Then, in the now-familiar Product Key phase, enter your product key. It's on the back of the pull-out Vista packaging. You can choose to automatically activate Windows when online or not, it's your choice. In the next screen, accept the Windows EULA. Now, choose the Upgrade option. Windows will install as before, though you might notice that it takes quite a bit longer this time. (Upgrade installs seem to take up to 45 minutes, compared to 30 minutes or less with clean installs, and reboots at least one additional time.) Because you've just completed an upgrade install, you won't be prompted to enter your user name and so forth (only the time zone screen is presented). Instead, you'll just boot directly to the Welcome screen when the performance check is complete. Using the user name and password you created during the first install, logon to Windows. Once again, you have 30 days in which to activate Vista. However, this time activation will work: To activate Vista immediately (unless you told it to do so during Setup), open the Start Menu, right-click Computer, and choose Properties. Then, at the bottom of the System window that appears, click the link titled Activate Windows now. Is this legal? One might naturally wonder whether the aforementioned instructions describe an action that is legal or ethical. After all, anyone could purchase an Upgrade version of Windows Vista (therefore saving a lot of money when compared to a Full version) and use it to perform a clean install even if they don't own a previous, compliant Window version. After telling my "Windows Vista Secrets" coauthor Brian Livingston about this workaround, he wrote that using this process was indeed ethical, in his opinion. "Microsoft itself created the upgrade process," he wrote in a newsletter article describing the workaround. "The company designed Vista to support upgrading it over a previously installed copy of XP, W2K Pro, or Vista itself. This isn't a black-hat hacker exploit. It's something that's been deliberately programmed into the approved setup routine." Fair enough. Of course, if you do use this workaround to clean install Vista with the Upgrade media, and you don't own a previous, compliant version of Windows, you're most certainly violating the Windows EULA and, thus, breaking the law. Proceed at your own risk. Final thoughts This is an interesting and viable workaround for anyone who owns a previous Windows version but would like to perform a clean install of the new operating system on their existing hardware. While I'm a bit nervous about legal implications and Microsoft's ability to cut off this process in the future, I'm glad that innocent Windows upgraders do in fact have all the options that were available to them in previous Windows versions. For its part in this silliness, Microsoft gets a virtual slap on the wrist: Sometimes, it seems, the company forgets that Windows is expensive and paying customers should be able to easily install the new OS without taking on the added clutter of a previous Windows installation. --Paul Thurrott February 3, 2007" |
|
|||
upgrade c: from pata to sata with vista ultimate 64bit upgrade dis
"Wayne Wastier" wrote in message
... Wayne, that's all well and good but your advice to click on the Change Product Key link could not work because a product key had not been entered yet. You remember from TechBeta that the link only works to replace a pk, not enter the first one. If he activates and enters the upgrade pk there that will reject also because when he performed the keyless install a full edition was installed and only a full edition pk will be accepted by the activation wizard. The workaround can ONLY work if the upgrade pk is entered up front during the second (in-place-upgrade) installation. but my vista ultimate disc is an upgrade disc (from xp) and so its not working. any suggestions? "The easiest way to handle this is to install Vista x64 and leave out the serial when prompted. Then choose the version you have from the list and finish install. Next, you need to change the serial number by left click on the START button, then right click on Computer, and left click on Change Product Key under Windows Activation. Wayne" The installation using the workaround would work but is not supported by MS PSS and he qualifies for that with his retail pk. Also, it is not clear from what I have been hearing from MS contacts what will happen with the workaround and licensing questions. It is just better if he plays by the book here and installs XP and then upgrades. |
|
|||
upgrade c: from pata to sata with vista ultimate 64bit upgrade dis
"Colin Barnhorst" wrote in message
news "Wayne Wastier" wrote in message ... The installation using the workaround would work but is not supported by MS PSS and he qualifies for that with his retail pk. Also, it is not clear from what I have been hearing from MS contacts what will happen with the workaround and licensing questions. It is just better if he plays by the book here and installs XP and then upgrades. All I know is that it works, and I haven't seen a retraction by Paul Thurrott. And yes it still works. Many times I have installed and didn't enter my serial until after I had installed all drivers and programs that are mandatory for me, thus saving me a call to the activation center. Wayne |
|
|||
upgrade c: from pata to sata with vista ultimate 64bit upgrade dis
P.S. Microsoft made a big mistake by not allowing clean installs after
proving ownership of the qualifying product as they did in the past. One should simply be able to enter the serial of the qualifying product during install, and just as WPA looks at the hardware, it could verify the serial right after the install and if not found could disable the install. It doesn't take a genius to figure this out, as I could do it. Later |
|
|||
upgrade c: from pata to sata with vista ultimate 64bit upgrade dis
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 02:49:45 -0700, "Wayne Wastier"
wrote: P.S. Microsoft made a big mistake by not allowing clean installs after proving ownership of the qualifying product as they did in the past. Change your name to "Wayne Wacky". The old method allowed one to use an upgrade installation disc by simply borrowing a qualifying disc from a friend. One should simply be able to enter the serial of the qualifying product during install, and just as WPA looks at the hardware, it could verify the serial right after the install and if not found could disable the install. It doesn't take a genius to figure this out, as I could do it. Later |
|
|||
upgrade c: from pata to sata with vista ultimate 64bit upgrade dis
"Wayne Wastier" wrote in message
... P.S. Microsoft made a big mistake by not allowing clean installs after proving ownership of the qualifying product as they did in the past. One should simply be able to enter the serial of the qualifying product during install, and just as WPA looks at the hardware, it could verify the serial right after the install and if not found could disable the install. It doesn't take a genius to figure this out, as I could do it. Later Wayne, I agree. You should see the mess if a user only has an upgrade product key and attempts a retromigration from x64 Vista to x86 using a Custom install instead of a clean install. Without a classic clean installation he gets a messed up Vista x86. I have posted a description of that in microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general if you care to see. While the workaround is an option the jury is still out on whether MS is going to take steps to invalidate activations of Vista installed using it. In any case, it is clearly not the user experience MS wants. I have been hammering at MS to let x86 Setup work the same way as x64 Setup when using an upgrade pk. x64 Setup does not require running from existing Windows when using an upgrade pk and I think it is stupid not to let x86 Setup do the same. |
|
|||
upgrade c: from pata to sata with vista ultimate 64bit upgrade dis
"Nonny" wrote in message
... On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 02:49:45 -0700, "Wayne Wastier" wrote: P.S. Microsoft made a big mistake by not allowing clean installs after proving ownership of the qualifying product as they did in the past. Change your name to "Wayne Wacky". The old method allowed one to use an upgrade installation disc by simply borrowing a qualifying disc from a friend. One should simply be able to enter the serial of the qualifying product during install, and just as WPA looks at the hardware, it could verify the serial right after the install and if not found could disable the install. It doesn't take a genius to figure this out, as I could do it. Later I think Wayne's point is that x86 Setup forces the user to run from existing Windows when using an upgrade pk. The problem is that the disk tools are not available to do a clean install. Unfortunately, MS did not block running x86 Setup from within existing x64 Windows, allowing the user to do a Custom install from there. Doing so is a fatal mistake. A custom install of x86 on x64 is a mess. I commented on that today in microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general. You get things like a Program Files (x86) folder in a 32bit Windows. x86 cannot rollup a 64bit Windows into windows.old. It copies everything there but cannot delete so you get left with a parallel installation in the same partition. |
|
|||
upgrade c: from pata to sata with vista ultimate 64bit upgrade dis
"Colin Barnhorst" wrote in message
... "Wayne Wastier" wrote in message ... P.S. Microsoft made a big mistake by not allowing clean installs after proving ownership of the qualifying product as they did in the past. One should simply be able to enter the serial of the qualifying product during install, and just as WPA looks at the hardware, it could verify the serial right after the install and if not found could disable the install. It doesn't take a genius to figure this out, as I could do it. Later Wayne, I agree. You should see the mess if a user only has an upgrade product key and attempts a retromigration from x64 Vista to x86 using a Custom install instead of a clean install. Without a classic clean installation he gets a messed up Vista x86. I have posted a description of that in microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general if you care to see. While the workaround is an option the jury is still out on whether MS is going to take steps to invalidate activations of Vista installed using it. In any case, it is clearly not the user experience MS wants. I have been hammering at MS to let x86 Setup work the same way as x64 Setup when using an upgrade pk. x64 Setup does not require running from existing Windows when using an upgrade pk and I think it is stupid not to let x86 Setup do the same. I wish you well in your endeavors with Microsoft in this matter. And thanks for your input. Wayne |
|
|||
upgrade c: from pata to sata with vista ultimate 64bit upgrade dis
Colin, if Microsoft hasn't forbidden using Paul's method for doing a clean
install, why are you posting at first that it doesn't work then posting that it does but that one day Microsoft might forbid such upgrades? Not on your case, just wondering where this is coming from? Wayne |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|