![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Networking with Windows Vista Networking issues and questions with Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
We are encountering a very rare situation…The scenario is Windows Vista
Enterprise and users logging in an Active Directory Domain. From my understanding, when using ADSI or accessing to Active Directory programmatically, a copy of the schema cache is downloaded and saved for being used. This cache file in XP was in %windir%\schcache, and in Vista it relies in %localappdata%\microsoft\windows\schcache. This way the user has privileges and UAC do not interfere. This however makes that each user that logs in, maintains and downloads a copy of the schema cache, but this can be avoided by this article: https://msdn.microsoft.com/library/d...si_and_uac.asp The problem we have is that every time a user logs in, this cache is being downloaded despite it already was previously downloaded and without any changes to the AD schema…This has a huge impact on the login script process because it takes in addition a long time (don’t know why) to download the file before it starts processing the ADSI portion on the login script. In my opinion, it should be downloaded only if the schema changed… Curious that if I execute the login script directly (double click) it executes in milliseconds…and when processing the login script I can see the ..sch file being generated because it takes 5/6 minutes (I can see how it grows 1kb, 3kb, 5kb, ...). I have found someone with a similar issue http://groups.google.es/group/micros...7ce03726c441b9 Checking the modifyTimeStamp on the subSchemaSubEntry we have found disparate values from Domain Controller to Domain Controller. Is this correct? Any idea would be appreciated! Ricard |