![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hello there, I've been looking around for a registry defragment tool/cleaner tool for windows vista to keep my laptop and desktop in top shape. Both are running Windows Vista Ultimate 64bit Edition. Both have at 4gb of ram (laptop has additional 1gig intel turbo flash cache for ready boost) I saw Wise Registry Cleaner AusLogics Registry Defrag CCLeaner What else is there? What's the most effective? -- Coderedpl |
|
|||
|
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:21:03 -0500, Coderedpl
wrote: Hello there, I've been looking around for a registry defragment tool/cleaner tool for windows vista to keep my laptop and desktop in top shape. http://tinyurl.com/4kw5cx Both are running Windows Vista Ultimate 64bit Edition. Both have at 4gb of ram (laptop has additional 1gig intel turbo flash cache for ready boost) I saw Wise Registry Cleaner AusLogics Registry Defrag CCLeaner What else is there? What's the most effective? |
|
|||
|
if you are not confident enough to edit the registry manually, then leave
well alone. Registry cleaners are not going to help and are more likely to cause problems than solve them. Personally I use CCleaner 'but' I only use the 'cleaner' section, I don't use the 'registry' cleaner. -- -- John Barnett MVP Windows XP Associate Expert Windows Desktop Experience Web: http://xphelpandsupport.mvps.org Web: http://vistasupport.mvps.org Web: http://www.silversurfer-guide.com The information in this mail/post is supplied "as is". No warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, is made in relation to the accuracy, reliability or content of this mail/post. The Author shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising out of the use of, or inability to use, information or opinions expressed in this mail/post.. "Coderedpl" wrote in message ... Hello there, I've been looking around for a registry defragment tool/cleaner tool for windows vista to keep my laptop and desktop in top shape. Both are running Windows Vista Ultimate 64bit Edition. Both have at 4gb of ram (laptop has additional 1gig intel turbo flash cache for ready boost) I saw Wise Registry Cleaner AusLogics Registry Defrag CCLeaner What else is there? What's the most effective? -- Coderedpl |
|
|||
|
Well I wouldn't say I'm not confident in doing it myself, but it would definitely make my life easier. -- Coderedpl |
|
|||
|
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:10:23 -0500, Coderedpl
wrote: Well I wouldn't say I'm not confident in doing it myself, but it would definitely make my life easier. To do what? Remove "orphaned" entries?? What will that do? How will it benefit your system? |
|
|||
|
"Coderedpl" wrote in message
... Hello there, I've been looking around for a registry defragment tool/cleaner tool for windows vista to keep my laptop and desktop in top shape. Both are running Windows Vista Ultimate 64bit Edition. Both have at 4gb of ram (laptop has additional 1gig intel turbo flash cache for ready boost) I saw Wise Registry Cleaner AusLogics Registry Defrag CCLeaner What else is there? What's the most effective? -- Coderedpl Think your Registry needs "cleaning"? Read http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?t=28099 and draw your own conclusions. -- Frank Saunders MS-MVP IE,OE/WM Do not reply with email |
|
|||
|
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:10:23 -0500, Coderedpl wrote:
Well I wouldn't say I'm not confident in doing it myself, but it would definitely make my life easier. Why I donąt use registry cleaners! http://www.edbott.com/weblog/archives/000643.html |
|
|||
|
Coderedpl wrote:
Hello there, I've been looking around for a registry defragment tool/cleaner tool for windows vista to keep my laptop and desktop in top shape. If you seriously want to keep your computers in "top shape," you don't ever want to use *ANY* registry cleaner on them. Period. A registry cleaner - even a safe one, should such ever be developed - is an exercise in, at best, futility. There is no real need for registry cleaners, other than to provide a profit to their manufacturers. On rare occasions, registry cleaners can be, in the hands of a skilled technician, useful, time-saving diagnostic tools. Otherwise, they're nothing but snake oil. Why do you even think you'd ever need to clean your registry? What specific *problems* are you actually experiencing (not some program's bogus listing of imaginary problems) that you think can be fixed by using a registry cleaner? If you do have a problem that is rooted in the registry, it would be far better to simply edit (after backing up, of course) only the specific key(s) and/or value(s) that are causing the problem. After all, why use a chainsaw when a scalpel will do the job? Additionally, the manually changing of one or two registry entries is far less likely to have the dire consequences of allowing an automated product to make multiple changes simultaneously. The only thing needed to safely clean your registry is knowledge and Regedit.exe. The registry contains all of the operating system's "knowledge" of the computer's hardware devices, installed software, the location of the device drivers, and the computer's configuration. A misstep in the registry can have severe consequences. One should not even turning loose a poorly understood automated "cleaner," unless he is fully confident that he knows *exactly* what is going to happen as a result of each and every change. Having repeatedly seen the results of inexperienced people using automated registry "cleaners," I can only advise all but the most experienced computer technicians (and/or hobbyists) to avoid them all. Experience has shown me that such tools simply are not safe in the hands of the inexperienced user. If you lack the knowledge and experience to maintain your registry by yourself, then you also lack the knowledge and experience to safely configure and use any automated registry cleaner, no matter how safe they claim to be. More importantly, no one has ever demonstrated that the use of an automated registry cleaner, particularly by an untrained, inexperienced computer user, does any real good, whatsoever. There's certainly been no empirical evidence offered to demonstrate that the use of such products to "clean" WinXP's registry improves a computer's performance or stability. Given the potential for harm, it's just not worth the risk. Granted, most registry "cleaners" won't cause problems each and every time they're used, but the potential for harm is always there. And, since no registry "cleaner" has ever been demonstrated to do any good (think of them like treating the flu with chicken soup - there's no real medicinal value, but it sometimes provides a warming placebo effect), I always tell people that the risks far out-weigh the non-existent benefits. I will concede that a good registry *scanning* tool, in the hands of an experienced and knowledgeable technician or hobbyist can be a useful time-saving diagnostic tool, as long as it's not allowed to make any changes automatically. But I really don't think that there are any registry cleaners that are truly safe for the general public to use. Experience has proven just the opposite: such tools simply are not safe in the hands of the inexperienced user. -- Bruce Chambers Help us help you: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375 They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand Russell The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has killed a great many philosophers. ~ Denis Diderot |
|
|||
|
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:21:03 -0500, Coderedpl
wrote: Hello there, I've been looking around for a registry defragment tool/cleaner tool for windows vista to keep my laptop and desktop in top shape. Defragmenting is fine, but registry cleaning programs are *all* snake oil. Cleaning of the registry isn't needed and is dangerous. Leave the registry alone and don't use any registry cleaner. Despite what many people think, and what vendors of registry cleaning software try to convince you of, having unused registry entries doesn't really hurt you. The risk of a serious problem caused by a registry cleaner erroneously removing an entry you need is far greater than any potential benefit it may have. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
|
|||
|
Defragmenting the Registry is worth doing. As for registry cleaner's they
are, to be honest, a waste of space. After I replied to your post yesterday I downloaded Wise registry cleaner, and Auslogic. A quick test produced the following: Auslogic could claim back 11% of my registry by defragmenting it: Ok that was fine I allowed it to do that. Having said that I didn't detect any increase in startup speed. CCleaner. This I already use, but have never used the registry cleaner. On using the registry cleaner it flagged 4 errors. All 4 errors were MRU (most recently used) website URL's. I knew what they were so allowed CCleaner to remove them. Wise Registry Cleaner. I ran this and I flagged well over 100 errors. At least 50 of these it wasn't sure whether it could remove them safely or not. The remaining 50 it said could be deleted but as most of the entries were CLID's (which basically include a long string of numbers) without me actually noting the CLID and then manually checking the registry I wasn't prepared to let Wise registry cleaner remove them. That was a simple, quick, test, nothing scientific. But why did Wise registry cleaner flag so many registry problems compared to CCleaner? The chances are that Wise registry cleaner hit so many 'false positives' that removing them 'may' have caused more problems or me than leaving them. And why did Wise registry cleaner advise me that 50% of the flagged errors needed further consideration before 'I' took the decision to remove them. If the registry cleaner was any good it should make the decision for me not, as has happened here, start dithering! While I agree 'it would make life easier' there is still an element of doubt and, personally, I feel that that element of doubt isn't worth taking. -- -- John Barnett MVP Windows XP Associate Expert Windows Desktop Experience Web: http://xphelpandsupport.mvps.org Web: http://vistasupport.mvps.org Web: http://www.silversurfer-guide.com The information in this mail/post is supplied "as is". No warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, is made in relation to the accuracy, reliability or content of this mail/post. The Author shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising out of the use of, or inability to use, information or opinions expressed in this mail/post.. "Coderedpl" wrote in message ... Well I wouldn't say I'm not confident in doing it myself, but it would definitely make my life easier. -- Coderedpl |