![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Networking with Windows Vista Networking issues and questions with Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hi there
does somebody know how to enable routing of ip ranges in the 169.254.x.x subnet over the default gw? when we manually add a route via the cmd all is functional but it seems that ms disabled the automatic routing of APIPA range over the default gw! thnxs andi |
|
|||
|
Andreas Wruhs wrote:
Hi there does somebody know how to enable routing of ip ranges in the 169.254.x.x subnet over the default gw? when we manually add a route via the cmd all is functional but it seems that ms disabled the automatic routing of APIPA range over the default gw! Well I personally wouldn't use the APIPA range of addresses for anything sophisticated enough to require routing, but when you manually add a route, I assume you're doing this with the 'ROUTE ADD' command? You can add a -p at the end of the command to make the route you've just defined persistent - have you tried this and found it didn't work? |
|
|||
|
"Robert Moir" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
... Andreas Wruhs wrote: Hi there does somebody know how to enable routing of ip ranges in the 169.254.x.x subnet over the default gw? when we manually add a route via the cmd all is functional but it seems that ms disabled the automatic routing of APIPA range over the default gw! Well I personally wouldn't use the APIPA range of addresses for anything sophisticated enough to require routing, but when you manually add a route, I assume you're doing this with the 'ROUTE ADD' command? You can add a -p at the end of the command to make the route you've just defined persistent - have you tried this and found it didn't work? as i said when adding a route permanent or not everything is working - but i guess there is a reg key where you can enable or disable this behavior! Andi |
|
|||
|
IPs in the 169 (private addresses) set are automatically assigned by Windows
when DHCP not available. With 169 addresses, computers can only communication within their network - they have no access outside of their network (public IPs required - such as 192.*.*.*). "Andreas Wruhs" wrote in message ... Hi there does somebody know how to enable routing of ip ranges in the 169.254.x.x subnet over the default gw? when we manually add a route via the cmd all is functional but it seems that ms disabled the automatic routing of APIPA range over the default gw! thnxs andi |
|
|||
|
Andreas Wruhs wrote:
"Robert Moir" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... Andreas Wruhs wrote: Hi there does somebody know how to enable routing of ip ranges in the 169.254.x.x subnet over the default gw? when we manually add a route via the cmd all is functional but it seems that ms disabled the automatic routing of APIPA range over the default gw! Well I personally wouldn't use the APIPA range of addresses for anything sophisticated enough to require routing, but when you manually add a route, I assume you're doing this with the 'ROUTE ADD' command? You can add a -p at the end of the command to make the route you've just defined persistent - have you tried this and found it didn't work? as i said when adding a route permanent or not everything is working - but i guess there is a reg key where you can enable or disable this behavior! Long story short, you're not "supposed" to route traffic to/from that subnet, it's purely meant for very simple networks, so I'm not surprised you have to work hard to get it to route traffic. |
|
|||
|
We know all of that - but du you know how to enable the routing or not? - In
2000, XP, 2003 it works!! "AJR" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... IPs in the 169 (private addresses) set are automatically assigned by Windows when DHCP not available. With 169 addresses, computers can only communication within their network - they have no access outside of their network (public IPs required - such as 192.*.*.*). "Andreas Wruhs" wrote in message ... Hi there does somebody know how to enable routing of ip ranges in the 169.254.x.x subnet over the default gw? when we manually add a route via the cmd all is functional but it seems that ms disabled the automatic routing of APIPA range over the default gw! thnxs andi |
|
|||
|
The fact that it used to work doesn't mean it always will. It was never
supposed to work and using the fact that it sometimes worked was a mistake. You would be much better off to redesign the network properly so it doesn't break again in the future. "169.254.0.0/16 - This is the "link local" block. It is allocated for communication between hosts on a single link. Hosts obtain these addresses by auto-configuration, such as when a DHCP server may not be found." http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3330 -- Kerry Brown Microsoft MVP - Shell/User www.vistahelp.ca/phpBB2 "Andreas Wruhs" wrote in message ... We know all of that - but du you know how to enable the routing or not? - In 2000, XP, 2003 it works!! "AJR" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... IPs in the 169 (private addresses) set are automatically assigned by Windows when DHCP not available. With 169 addresses, computers can only communication within their network - they have no access outside of their network (public IPs required - such as 192.*.*.*). "Andreas Wruhs" wrote in message ... Hi there does somebody know how to enable routing of ip ranges in the 169.254.x.x subnet over the default gw? when we manually add a route via the cmd all is functional but it seems that ms disabled the automatic routing of APIPA range over the default gw! thnxs andi |