![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Networking with Windows Vista Networking issues and questions with Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing) |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
We have a small domain consisting of SBS2003 with workstations using
Vista Business and one Notebook with XP Pro. The XP machine doesn't appear in the list of clients in Windows Explorer\Network on the Vista machines, however the reverse is true from the XP Notebook- all Vista machine appear under My Network Places, and it can access files on the Vista machines, public plus manually shared folders. Is this a known compatibility issue ? rgds Roberto |
|
|||
|
Please post the results of ipconfig /all from the SBS server and from the XP
computer. I have a question for you. Why do the clients need to see any computers other than the server? In an active directory based network all of the network resources should be available through active directory and the server. -- Kerry Brown MS-MVP - Windows Desktop Experience: Systems Administration http://www.vistahelp.ca/phpBB2/ http://vistahelpca.blogspot.com/ "Roberto le Cornielle" wrote in message ... We have a small domain consisting of SBS2003 with workstations using Vista Business and one Notebook with XP Pro. The XP machine doesn't appear in the list of clients in Windows Explorer\Network on the Vista machines, however the reverse is true from the XP Notebook- all Vista machine appear under My Network Places, and it can access files on the Vista machines, public plus manually shared folders. Is this a known compatibility issue ? rgds Roberto |
|
|||
|
"Kerry Brown" *a*m wrote in message ... Please post the results of ipconfig /all from the SBS server and from the XP computer. I have a question for you. Why do the clients need to see any computers other than the server? In an active directory based network all of the network resources should be available through active directory and the server. Kerry Thanks for reading my post, but wouldn't you know it I just checked again whilst getting the IPconfig data for you and it's all working. PS We have a shared drive on one Vista station [bad idea ?]and it was no longer available to the XP Notebook for whatever reason, so whilst checking it out I noticed the XP Notebook wasn't showing up on any of the Vista stations. rgds Roberto -- Kerry Brown MS-MVP - Windows Desktop Experience: Systems Administration http://www.vistahelp.ca/phpBB2/ http://vistahelpca.blogspot.com/ "Roberto le Cornielle" wrote in message ... We have a small domain consisting of SBS2003 with workstations using Vista Business and one Notebook with XP Pro. The XP machine doesn't appear in the list of clients in Windows Explorer\Network on the Vista machines, however the reverse is true from the XP Notebook- all Vista machine appear under My Network Places, and it can access files on the Vista machines, public plus manually shared folders. Is this a known compatibility issue ? rgds Roberto |
|
|||
|
It's not a problem but yes, I think it is a bad idea. In a network with a
server all shared resources should be on the server. This simplifies backups and controlling access to the data. You should also never share a drive. It is better to create a folder then share the folder. This gives you more options in the future in case you want to create additional shares on the same drive. If it is the system drive then it is a major security faux paux to share the drive. -- Kerry Brown MS-MVP - Windows Desktop Experience: Systems Administration http://www.vistahelp.ca/phpBB2/ http://vistahelpca.blogspot.com/ "Roberto le Cornielle" wrote in message ... "Kerry Brown" *a*m wrote in message ... Please post the results of ipconfig /all from the SBS server and from the XP computer. I have a question for you. Why do the clients need to see any computers other than the server? In an active directory based network all of the network resources should be available through active directory and the server. Kerry Thanks for reading my post, but wouldn't you know it I just checked again whilst getting the IPconfig data for you and it's all working. PS We have a shared drive on one Vista station [bad idea ?]and it was no longer available to the XP Notebook for whatever reason, so whilst checking it out I noticed the XP Notebook wasn't showing up on any of the Vista stations. rgds Roberto -- Kerry Brown MS-MVP - Windows Desktop Experience: Systems Administration http://www.vistahelp.ca/phpBB2/ http://vistahelpca.blogspot.com/ "Roberto le Cornielle" wrote in message ... We have a small domain consisting of SBS2003 with workstations using Vista Business and one Notebook with XP Pro. The XP machine doesn't appear in the list of clients in Windows Explorer\Network on the Vista machines, however the reverse is true from the XP Notebook- all Vista machine appear under My Network Places, and it can access files on the Vista machines, public plus manually shared folders. Is this a known compatibility issue ? rgds Roberto |
|
|||
|
"+Bob+" wrote in message
... On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 07:16:35 -0700, "Kerry Brown" *a*m wrote: If it is the system drive then it is a major security faux paux to share the drive. Sort of like the default C$ shares that MS automatically sets up? :-) I think you'll find that the C$ "share" is for internal machine use only. Try actually sharing the root of the C drive for network access- I think you'll find you can't. |
|
|||
|
Vista disables access to the hidden administrative shares by default. I
agree that the hidden shares on older versions of Windows can be a security problem if you routinely use an administrator account, particularly if you use the "Administrator" account without a password. This is one of the reasons I like Vista. It makes it hard to do all of the above :-) -- Kerry Brown MS-MVP - Windows Desktop Experience: Systems Administration http://www.vistahelp.ca/phpBB2/ http://vistahelpca.blogspot.com/ "+Bob+" wrote in message ... On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 07:16:35 -0700, "Kerry Brown" *a*m wrote: If it is the system drive then it is a major security faux paux to share the drive. Sort of like the default C$ shares that MS automatically sets up? :-) |
|
|||
|
Roberto - many replies - but few address your post. Check KB922120
regarding LLTD - Link Layer Discovery Protocol which must be installed on a XP computer to have it "visible" on Vista network map. "Roberto le Cornielle" wrote in message ... We have a small domain consisting of SBS2003 with workstations using Vista Business and one Notebook with XP Pro. The XP machine doesn't appear in the list of clients in Windows Explorer\Network on the Vista machines, however the reverse is true from the XP Notebook- all Vista machine appear under My Network Places, and it can access files on the Vista machines, public plus manually shared folders. Is this a known compatibility issue ? rgds Roberto |
|
|||
|
"+Bob+" wrote in message
... On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:08:19 -0700, "Kerry Brown" *a*m wrote: Vista disables access to the hidden administrative shares by default. I agree that the hidden shares on older versions of Windows can be a security problem if you routinely use an administrator account, particularly if you use the "Administrator" account without a password. This is one of the reasons I like Vista. It makes it hard to do all of the above :-) The issue I see is that they are shared by default. Whether or not I have an administrator account, I still know that the worlds most dangerous share (C$) is there waiting for me. All I have to do on most systems is hack a password (I know the username 99% of the time) and I have full control of the system drive. This might qualify as Microsoft's most ignorant move ever... especially since most users don't even know the share is there to be disabled. No disagreement here :-) It's a real pain in the butt. I used to routinely disable adminsitrative shares but inevitably something changed and they reappeared. Now I just make sure all accounts have strong passwords and live with it but I don't like it. As for using an admin account without a password, you deserve what you get when you do really stupid things :-) Vista security might be better if they hadn't made such simple, global decisions about protection - as it is power users have to run as admin most of the time to get work done. That is the power of UAC. You can logon with an administrator account but only get administrator powers through UAC. It's very similar to what some Linux distros are doing now. -- Kerry Brown MS-MVP - Windows Desktop Experience: Systems Administration http://www.vistahelp.ca/phpBB2/ http://vistahelpca.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|