![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance) |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I remember that in previous versions of Windows all the way up to Windows
XP, the Disk Defragmenter would tell me exactly how much of the defragmentation process was complete. Now, I find that Windows Vista tells me absolutely nothing about what Disk Defragmenter is doing, apart from the fact that the utility is in fact running. My question is, why would Microsoft throw out such a useful feature in Disk Defragmenter, and is there any course of action I can take regarding this dilemma? Brandon Taylor |
|
|||
|
It's designed to work in the background.
Forgetaboutit. -- Vista Home Premium 32 SP1 http://get.live.com/wlmail/overview http://download.live.com/wlmail "Brandon Taylor" wrote in message ... I remember that in previous versions of Windows all the way up to Windows XP, the Disk Defragmenter would tell me exactly how much of the defragmentation process was complete. Now, I find that Windows Vista tells me absolutely nothing about what Disk Defragmenter is doing, apart from the fact that the utility is in fact running. My question is, why would Microsoft throw out such a useful feature in Disk Defragmenter, and is there any course of action I can take regarding this dilemma? Brandon Taylor |
|
|||
|
Brandon Taylor;872354 Wrote: I remember that in previous versions of Windows all the way up to Windows XP, the Disk Defragmenter would tell me exactly how much of the defragmentation process was complete. Now, I find that Windows Vista tells me absolutely nothing about what Disk Defragmenter is doing, apart from the fact that the utility is in fact running. My question is, why would Microsoft throw out such a useful feature in Disk Defragmenter, and is there any course of action I can take regarding this dilemma? Brandon Taylor other than 3rd party options not really, there is a completion gauge in the command line version in vista but the changes in the GUI version is based on the fact that it is supposed to run in background and use as few resources as possible so the "bells and Whistles" are not needed ![]() -- barman58 Regards, *Nigel* the beginning of knowledge is the discovery of something we do not understand.,- frank herbert |
|
|||
|
Hi Brandon,
Every time you use the pc, you incur some measure of fragmentation. Rather than do it wholesale and then wait for a deterioration in performance before doing it again, the defrag routine in Vista is ongoing. By doing it this way, it constantly works to optimize performance, employing times when the machine isn't in use. You don't need to see it, as the level of fragmentation is immaterial. If you really want to see a machine defrag, then there are plenty of third party products that will turn you pc into a display to watch while you wait for it to finish. Personally, I'd rather just use my machine and not watch blocks move (unless I'm playing tetris). -- Best of Luck, Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ Windows help - www.rickrogers.org My thoughts http://rick-mvp.blogspot.com "Brandon Taylor" wrote in message ... I remember that in previous versions of Windows all the way up to Windows XP, the Disk Defragmenter would tell me exactly how much of the defragmentation process was complete. Now, I find that Windows Vista tells me absolutely nothing about what Disk Defragmenter is doing, apart from the fact that the utility is in fact running. My question is, why would Microsoft throw out such a useful feature in Disk Defragmenter, and is there any course of action I can take regarding this dilemma? Brandon Taylor |
|
|||
|
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:25:49 -0500, "Brandon Taylor"
wrote: I remember that in previous versions of Windows all the way up to Windows XP, the Disk Defragmenter would tell me exactly how much of the defragmentation process was complete. Now, I find that Windows Vista tells me absolutely nothing about what Disk Defragmenter is doing, apart from the fact that the utility is in fact running. My question is, why would Microsoft throw out such a useful feature in Disk Defragmenter, and is there any course of action I can take regarding this dilemma? This question has been asked a bazillion times already. GOT GOOGLE? DDW -- Reply via this group No email please |
|
|||
|
How in the world Microsoft managed to overcome the need to close all running
processes before you defragment your system is beyond me! -- B.D.T. "Dave" wrote in message ... It's designed to work in the background. Forgetaboutit. -- Vista Home Premium 32 SP1 http://get.live.com/wlmail/overview http://download.live.com/wlmail "Brandon Taylor" wrote in message ... I remember that in previous versions of Windows all the way up to Windows XP, the Disk Defragmenter would tell me exactly how much of the defragmentation process was complete. Now, I find that Windows Vista tells me absolutely nothing about what Disk Defragmenter is doing, apart from the fact that the utility is in fact running. My question is, why would Microsoft throw out such a useful feature in Disk Defragmenter, and is there any course of action I can take regarding this dilemma? Brandon Taylor |
|
|||
|
Vista's defrag runs as a low priority process in the background. So, it has no 'proper' GUI, drive map or ETA. If you want a GUI, drive map, faster defrags, more features etc, then you'll need to buy a commercial program such as Diskeeper 2008. BTW, there is no need to close running processes to defrag in XP or Vista, unlike for Win 9X. Almost all files can be defragged within Windows itself (Diskeeper even defrags the MFT from within XP when it's running). For defragging the paging file and some metadata, a boot-time defrag will do the trick, and closing processes is irrelevant because you are doing it from 'outside' Windows anyway. -- barracuda ------------------------------------------------------------------------ barracuda's Profile: http://forums.techarena.in/members/barracuda.htm View this thread: http://forums.techarena.in/windows-v...ce/1062356.htm http://forums.techarena.in |
|
|||
|
Brandon Taylor;1054137 Wrote: I remember that in previous versions of Windows all the way up to Windows XP, the Disk Defragmenter would tell me exactly how much of the defragmentation process was complete. Now, I find that Windows Vista tells me absolutely nothing about what Disk Defragmenter is doing, apart from the fact that the utility is in fact running. My question is, why would Microsoft throw out such a useful feature in Disk Defragmenter, and is there any course of action I can take regarding this dilemma? Brandon Taylor If you want an automatic defragger which also shows the defrag process, the best option in my opinion is Diskeeper 08 -- namdeo Posted via http://www.vistaheads.com |
|
|||
|
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:27:00 +0000, namdeo
wrote: Brandon Taylor;1054137 Wrote: I remember that in previous versions of Windows all the way up to Windows XP, the Disk Defragmenter would tell me exactly how much of the defragmentation process was complete. Now, I find that Windows Vista tells me absolutely nothing about what Disk Defragmenter is doing, apart from the fact that the utility is in fact running. My question is, why would Microsoft throw out such a useful feature in Disk Defragmenter, and is there any course of action I can take regarding this dilemma? Brandon Taylor If you want an automatic defragger which also shows the defrag process, the best option in my opinion is Diskeeper 08 For a freebie that has all the pretty boxes and progress indicator PLUS which can be run either auto or in the background while everything else is running (just like Diskeeper), try Smart Defrag: http://www.iobit.com/iobitsmartdefrag.html -- Max |
|
|||
|
Thanks for all the suggestions, but I think I'll stick it out with the
Windows program for now. "The Max" wrote in message ... On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:27:00 +0000, namdeo wrote: Brandon Taylor;1054137 Wrote: I remember that in previous versions of Windows all the way up to Windows XP, the Disk Defragmenter would tell me exactly how much of the defragmentation process was complete. Now, I find that Windows Vista tells me absolutely nothing about what Disk Defragmenter is doing, apart from the fact that the utility is in fact running. My question is, why would Microsoft throw out such a useful feature in Disk Defragmenter, and is there any course of action I can take regarding this dilemma? Brandon Taylor If you want an automatic defragger which also shows the defrag process, the best option in my opinion is Diskeeper 08 For a freebie that has all the pretty boxes and progress indicator PLUS which can be run either auto or in the background while everything else is running (just like Diskeeper), try Smart Defrag: http://www.iobit.com/iobitsmartdefrag.html -- Max |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|