![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance) |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
"wxfreqrs" wrote:
Thanks for all the input as to Google I DON'T KNOW WHAT'S GOOD that's why I seek recommendations A simple visit to CNET, PCWorld, or PC Magazine sites would give you everything you need. Another site is Tucows. There is nothing there that you have to worry about. Richie Hardwick |
|
|||
|
appreciate that recommendation
"Richie Hardwick" wrote in message ... "wxfreqrs" wrote: Thanks for all the input as to Google I DON'T KNOW WHAT'S GOOD that's why I seek recommendations A simple visit to CNET, PCWorld, or PC Magazine sites would give you everything you need. Another site is Tucows. There is nothing there that you have to worry about. Richie Hardwick -- Semper Vigilis http://myweb.cableone.net/wxfreqrs/ Real Time Weather Observations http://www.jcmsara.org Ham Radio Don |
|
|||
|
"Richie Hardwick" wrote in message
... "wxfreqrs" wrote: Thanks for all the input as to Google I DON'T KNOW WHAT'S GOOD that's why I seek recommendations A simple visit to CNET, PCWorld, or PC Magazine sites would give you everything you need. Another site is Tucows. There is nothing there that you have to worry about. I disagree. Reviews and ratings in PC magazines are not reliable, primarily because the magazines get most of their income from their advertisers. Moreover several years ago, I had a young woman working for me as a technical writer; her previous job had been as a reviewer for PC Magazine. She wasn't a bad writer, but her knowledge of PCs and therefore abililty to review was next to nothing. I have no confidence in their reviews. |
|
|||
|
"Ken Blake" wrote:
"Richie Hardwick" wrote in message .. . "wxfreqrs" wrote: Thanks for all the input as to Google I DON'T KNOW WHAT'S GOOD that's why I seek recommendations A simple visit to CNET, PCWorld, or PC Magazine sites would give you everything you need. Another site is Tucows. There is nothing there that you have to worry about. I disagree. Reviews and ratings in PC magazines are not reliable, primarily because the magazines get most of their income from their advertisers. Moreover several years ago, I had a young woman working for me as a technical writer; her previous job had been as a reviewer for PC Magazine. She wasn't a bad writer, but her knowledge of PCs and therefore abililty to review was next to nothing. I have no confidence in their reviews. Who - except YOU - said anything about "reviews"??? I never mentioned a word about "reviews". What I was referring to was the fact that one would not have to worry about picking up trojan-laden software at those sites. As for "reviews"... the best IMO would be the number of downloads of a particular product. At least one of the sites I mentioned - CNET - even lists the Top 20 downloads across the entire field. One would have to be blind not to find two or three good anti-virus/anti-malware programs on that list. Richie Hardwick |
|
|||
|
"Richie Hardwick" wrote in message
... "Ken Blake" wrote: "Richie Hardwick" wrote in message . .. "wxfreqrs" wrote: Thanks for all the input as to Google I DON'T KNOW WHAT'S GOOD that's why I seek recommendations A simple visit to CNET, PCWorld, or PC Magazine sites would give you everything you need. Another site is Tucows. There is nothing there that you have to worry about. I disagree. Reviews and ratings in PC magazines are not reliable, primarily because the magazines get most of their income from their advertisers. Moreover several years ago, I had a young woman working for me as a technical writer; her previous job had been as a reviewer for PC Magazine. She wasn't a bad writer, but her knowledge of PCs and therefore abililty to review was next to nothing. I have no confidence in their reviews. Who - except YOU - said anything about "reviews"??? I never mentioned a word about "reviews". What I was referring to was the fact that one would not have to worry about picking up trojan-laden software at those sites. OK, I understand now, but that wasn't clear from your message. The OP said "I DON'T KNOW WHAT'S GOOD that's why I seek recommendations" and you replied "A simple visit to CNET, PCWorld, or PC Magazine sites would give you everything you need." That sure sounded to me like you were recommending sites that would give him the recommendations he wanted--in other words, reviews. |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|