A Windows Vista forum. Vista Banter

Welcome to Vista Banter.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

Go Back   Home » Vista Banter forum » Microsoft Windows Vista » Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance)

reliability index really isn't



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old November 7th 08, 08:34 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
fireman604
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24
Default reliability index really isn't


I have a question or maybe a comment. I have a computer that has a
performance rating of 5.8, from my understanding is pretty good, I am
running vista ultimate 64. I have a reliability index of 9.29 or
something around there until I try to burn a video file to a DVD or play
Spider solitare and try to exit with out saving score or game then
system locks up. solid lock up, the only way out is to hard reboot.
Nothing shows in logs as to what happened. The reliability score drops
because system was shut down improperly, My comment it doesn't help to
say I have a computer that meets Microsofts requirements but is it
really not any good? It is fine till until I use it then it locks up
and is totally non functional is rather misleading. Is anyone else out
there having similar problems.


--
fireman604

Tyan 2885 motherboard 2 275 dual core installed
Highpoint 1820 controllerWD Raptors in raid 5 plus
Sapphire 3850 AGP Video card Vista Ultimate 64
  #2 (permalink)  
Old November 7th 08, 09:19 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
SCSIraidGURU
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 156
Default reliability index really isn't


Its hype and BS.


--
SCSIraidGURU

Michael A. McKenney
'www.SCSIraidGURU.com' (http://www.SCSIraidGURU.com)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old November 7th 08, 09:27 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
fireman604
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24
Default reliability index really isn't


That is what I was thinking not what I typed. Vista what ever flavor has
lots of stuff as bait and as reinforcement for going there but really no
substance. An operating system that passes with a pretty good score on
performance (5.8) but does not perform, or is pretty good in the
reliability index (9.29) until it is shut down because it was non
functional really is false reinforsement and hype. I would much rather
have a scoring system that really reflected what the computer could do.
Thanks for the response. I really am tired of being lied to. If I screw
up I admit it what gives.


--
fireman604

Tyan 2885 motherboard 2 275 dual core installed
Highpoint 1820 controllerWD Raptors in raid 5 plus
Sapphire 3850 AGP Video card Vista Ultimate 64
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright ©2004-2012 Vista Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.