Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
Hardware and Windows Vista Hardware issues in relation to Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.hardware_devices) |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
Sata 1.5 versus sata 3
Does anyone know the easy answer to which is faster and is it really noticeable?? Considering upgrading one of my 160gig seagate barracuda's (sata 1.5) to a new barracuda sata 3.. Any responses as always appreciated -- Aylen1957 |
|
|||
Sata 1.5 versus sata 3
SATA 300 will transfer data twice as fast as SATA 150. However, you may only
notice the difference with large transfers since seek time and other system factors are also involved "Aylen1957" wrote in message ... Does anyone know the easy answer to which is faster and is it really noticeable?? Considering upgrading one of my 160gig seagate barracuda's (sata 1.5) to a new barracuda sata 3.. Any responses as always appreciated -- Aylen1957 |
|
|||
Sata 1.5 versus sata 3
Does your motherboard/SATA controller support SATA300 rates? If not you're
about to waste your money. Otherwise go for it. -- Richard G. Harper [MVP Shell/User] * NEW! Catch my blog ... http://msmvps.com/blogs/rgharper/ * PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups * The Website - http://rgharper.mvps.org/ "Aylen1957" wrote in message ... Does anyone know the easy answer to which is faster and is it really noticeable?? Considering upgrading one of my 160gig seagate barracuda's (sata 1.5) to a new barracuda sata 3.. Any responses as always appreciated -- Aylen1957 |