Hi.

Since I installed both 32-bit and 64-bit Vista Ultimate Edition on my
old test machine (ASUS K8V SE Deluxe, Athlon 64 3200+ [754 CPU], 512 MB
of RAM, SATA HDD, etc.), I notice the speeds are identical. I can't see
and feel any improvements. I did install the ATI Radeon 9600 AIW drivers
to help the video speed, but I just don't see the speed differences. Am
I expecting too much or missing something? I don't have any other
program installed so far. It's just a bare Vista with the latest ATI/AMD
video drivers from ati.com/amd.com.

Thank you in advance.
--
Phillip Pi
Senior Software Quality Assurance Analyst
ISP/Symantec Online Services, Consumer Business Unit
Symantec Corporation
www.symantec.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Email: YMC (remove SYMC to reply by e-mail)
-----------------------------------------------------
Please do NOT e-mail me for technical support. DISCLAIMER: The views
expressed in this posting are mine, and do not necessarily reflect the
views of my employer. Thank you.

x64 doesn't run faster. Clockspeed is determined by the hardware.
Performance would increase if you up the ram to 1GB.

"Phillip Pi" wrote in message
...
Hi.

Since I installed both 32-bit and 64-bit Vista Ultimate Edition on my old
test machine (ASUS K8V SE Deluxe, Athlon 64 3200+ [754 CPU], 512 MB of
RAM, SATA HDD, etc.), I notice the speeds are identical. I can't see and
feel any improvements. I did install the ATI Radeon 9600 AIW drivers to
help the video speed, but I just don't see the speed differences. Am I
expecting too much or missing something? I don't have any other program
installed so far. It's just a bare Vista with the latest ATI/AMD video
drivers from ati.com/amd.com.

Thank you in advance.
--
Phillip Pi
Senior Software Quality Assurance Analyst
ISP/Symantec Online Services, Consumer Business Unit
Symantec Corporation
www.symantec.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Email: YMC (remove SYMC to reply by e-mail)
-----------------------------------------------------
Please do NOT e-mail me for technical support. DISCLAIMER: The views
expressed in this posting are mine, and do not necessarily reflect the
views of my employer. Thank you.

You won't see any difference while running 32-bit programs.
You will only see a significant improvement in programs
written for the 64-bit environment. Panorama Factory,
http://www.panoramafactory.com/ used to have a comparison
between 32-bit and 64-bit, but I couldn't find it just now.


Phillip Pi wrote:
Hi.

Since I installed both 32-bit and 64-bit Vista Ultimate Edition on my
old test machine (ASUS K8V SE Deluxe, Athlon 64 3200+ [754 CPU], 512 MB
of RAM, SATA HDD, etc.), I notice the speeds are identical. I can't see
and feel any improvements. I did install the ATI Radeon 9600 AIW drivers
to help the video speed, but I just don't see the speed differences. Am
I expecting too much or missing something? I don't have any other
program installed so far. It's just a bare Vista with the latest ATI/AMD
video drivers from ati.com/amd.com.

Thank you in advance.

Aren't all the default Vista programs 64-bit? Or are they still in 32-bit?


On 12/28/2006 3:45 AM PT, Theo wrote:

You won't see any difference while running 32-bit programs. You will
only see a significant improvement in programs written for the 64-bit
environment. Panorama Factory, http://www.panoramafactory.com/ used to
have a comparison between 32-bit and 64-bit, but I couldn't find it just
now.


Phillip Pi wrote:
Hi.

Since I installed both 32-bit and 64-bit Vista Ultimate Edition on my
old test machine (ASUS K8V SE Deluxe, Athlon 64 3200+ [754 CPU], 512
MB of RAM, SATA HDD, etc.), I notice the speeds are identical. I can't
see and feel any improvements. I did install the ATI Radeon 9600 AIW
drivers to help the video speed, but I just don't see the speed
differences. Am I expecting too much or missing something? I don't
have any other program installed so far. It's just a bare Vista with
the latest ATI/AMD video drivers from ati.com/amd.com.

Thank you in advance.


--
Phillip Pi
Senior Software Quality Assurance Analyst
ISP/Symantec Online Services, Consumer Business Unit
Symantec Corporation
www.symantec.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Email: YMC (remove SYMC to reply by e-mail)
-----------------------------------------------------
Please do NOT e-mail me for technical support. DISCLAIMER: The views
expressed in this posting are mine, and do not necessarily reflect the
views of my employer. Thank you.

The bundled programs can be either. The kernel is 64bit.

"Phillip Pi" wrote in message
...
Aren't all the default Vista programs 64-bit? Or are they still in 32-bit?

Ah. Hmm, maybe that's why I can't feel/see the differences.


On 12/28/2006 12:36 PM PT, Colin Barnhorst wrote:

The bundled programs can be either. The kernel is 64bit.

"Phillip Pi" wrote in message
...
Aren't all the default Vista programs 64-bit? Or are they still in
32-bit?
--
Phillip Pi
Senior Software Quality Assurance Analyst
ISP/Symantec Online Services, Consumer Business Unit
Symantec Corporation
www.symantec.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Email: YMC (remove SYMC to reply by e-mail)
-----------------------------------------------------
Please do NOT e-mail me for technical support. DISCLAIMER: The views
expressed in this posting are mine, and do not necessarily reflect the
views of my employer. Thank you.

The clock speed is the same so you would not see differences. Performance
of either platform on a 64bit cpu is a matter of the hardware. Where you
would see a difference is between running a 32bit OS on a 32bit system
versus a 64bit system. The increased efficiency (head room) on a 64bit
system will benefit the 32bit OS in varying degrees.

"Phillip Pi" wrote in message
...
Ah. Hmm, maybe that's why I can't feel/see the differences.

Are you saying if I had a dual core Athlon 64 939/AM2 setup, I would
notice the performance differences on the same box?


On 12/28/2006 12:58 PM PT, Colin Barnhorst wrote:

The clock speed is the same so you would not see differences.
Performance of either platform on a 64bit cpu is a matter of the
hardware. Where you would see a difference is between running a 32bit
OS on a 32bit system versus a 64bit system. The increased efficiency
(head room) on a 64bit system will benefit the 32bit OS in varying degrees.

"Phillip Pi" wrote in message
...
Ah. Hmm, maybe that's why I can't feel/see the differences.
--
Phillip Pi
Senior Software Quality Assurance Analyst
ISP/Symantec Online Services, Consumer Business Unit
Symantec Corporation
www.symantec.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Email: YMC (remove SYMC to reply by e-mail)
-----------------------------------------------------
Please do NOT e-mail me for technical support. DISCLAIMER: The views
expressed in this posting are mine, and do not necessarily reflect the
views of my employer. Thank you.

Where it's really going to make a difference is when you go beyond the 4GB
limit on the 32-bit Vista. Even Home Basic will support 8GB on x64 and Vista
Ultimate x64 will support up to 128GB.

I know this sounds like overkill today but you can bet you right index
finger software makers will figure out a way to use up every bit as quick as
prices fall enough for people to realistically purchase it. I wouldn't be at
all surprised to see mid-level desktop systems with 2-4GB installed and
supporting 16-32GB on sale this time next year.

"Colin Barnhorst" wrote in message
...
x64 doesn't run faster. Clockspeed is determined by the hardware.
Performance would increase if you up the ram to 1GB.

"Phillip Pi" wrote in message
...
Hi.

Since I installed both 32-bit and 64-bit Vista Ultimate Edition on my old
test machine (ASUS K8V SE Deluxe, Athlon 64 3200+ [754 CPU], 512 MB of
RAM, SATA HDD, etc.), I notice the speeds are identical. I can't see and
feel any improvements. I did install the ATI Radeon 9600 AIW drivers to
help the video speed, but I just don't see the speed differences. Am I
expecting too much or missing something? I don't have any other program
installed so far. It's just a bare Vista with the latest ATI/AMD video
drivers from ati.com/amd.com.

Performance differences between what?

"Phillip Pi" wrote in message
...
Are you saying if I had a dual core Athlon 64 939/AM2 setup, I would
notice the performance differences on the same box?


On 12/28/2006 12:58 PM PT, Colin Barnhorst wrote:

The clock speed is the same so you would not see differences.
Performance of either platform on a 64bit cpu is a matter of the
hardware. Where you would see a difference is between running a 32bit OS
on a 32bit system versus a 64bit system. The increased efficiency (head
room) on a 64bit system will benefit the 32bit OS in varying degrees.

"Phillip Pi" wrote in message
...
Ah. Hmm, maybe that's why I can't feel/see the differences.
--
Phillip Pi
Senior Software Quality Assurance Analyst
ISP/Symantec Online Services, Consumer Business Unit
Symantec Corporation
www.symantec.com
-----------------------------------------------------
Email: YMC (remove SYMC to reply by e-mail)
-----------------------------------------------------
Please do NOT e-mail me for technical support. DISCLAIMER: The views
expressed in this posting are mine, and do not necessarily reflect the
views of my employer. Thank you.