![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I have no doubt that some developers are unhappy with Vista, just as they
have been unhappy with virtually every windows release for one reason or another. Part of the problem has been incomplete, inaccurate, and dated development documentation from MS. A classic type of problem is not documenting command or "call" parms and return data properly and completely. "Bruce Chambers" wrote in message ... Brian Kitt wrote: I have been a developer since early 80's. I've been disappointed, and re-disappointed year after year at the lower and lower quality of crap that Microsoft pushes on us. But Vista absolutely takes the cake. I've been running it for a year, and still get frustrated every single day about what a total worthless pile of crap this is. Why can't Microsoft stop spening money trying to convince people this piece of trash is good, and spend some money trying to do R&D and fix this. I'm sick and tired of constant crashes, lockups, and hanging. This is the most worthless piece of software Microsoft has ever developed. Do you have any specific problem(s) with which you need help, or are you just venting? What very little detail you included points towards an issue of incompatible/sub-standard/defective hardware, or device drivers, incompatible software, and defective/sub-standard wetware. -- Bruce Chambers Help us help you: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375 They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand Russell The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has killed a great many philosophers. ~ Denis Diderot |
|
|||
|
Ok..another Steve heard from. I found my way here because my new laptop is
constantly crashing. You name it, explorer...sidebar, every time I try to load a photo. Etc....I was searching for a patch or update since it is new out of the box, but all I see is a lot of unhappy people. I'll take suggestions now. Thanx "Steve Thackery" wrote: Steve, that is my point in frustration. There are so many problems in Vista, I can't believe it was released. I see the same frustrations and problems I have on other forums, and co-works. Everyone I talk to has the same complaints. It's not me dude, it's the software. What problems? Be specific. Don't just rant. Here's the bottom line: Vista itself is stable - it doesn't crash or freeze. If your (or anyone else's) machine is crashing or freezing it is due to: 1/ dodgy hardware (overclocked, overheating, overloaded, out-of-spec, failing, etc), or 2/ dodgy 3rd party drivers (and there are plenty of those around) BOTH of those will render XP, Linux, MacOSX and all the others unstable, too. Not just Vista. Finally, remember that various applications are prone to crashing - especially those that were released before Vista and haven't been updated to Vista-compatible. But that, of course, is not the fault of Vista. So come on, mate, put your money where your mouth is. Show us the "problems" and we'll get to the bottom of whether they are due to Vista, or due to something else. If you won't do that, then you're wasting everyone's time. SteveT |
|
|||
|
Steve R wrote:
Ok..another Steve heard from. I found my way here because my new laptop is constantly crashing. You name it, explorer...sidebar, every time I try to load a photo. Etc....I was searching for a patch or update since it is new out of the box, but all I see is a lot of unhappy people. I'll take suggestions now. Well, you've a new laptop with problems. Let's see now, what would you do if you bought a new car and it wouldn't run properly? What would you do with a new TV that only received local broadcast stations? Would you even have to ask? Wouldn't you take it back to where you got it and demand a working product? Why would you think it'd be any different with a computer? -- Bruce Chambers Help us help you: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375 They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand Russell The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has killed a great many philosophers. ~ Denis Diderot |
|
|||
|
I've run Vista since early beta and maybe I've been lucky but I haven't had
a single crash. I admit that I always said Vista was released too early - now that has been acknowledged. It certainly isn't, as you put it, ' a worthless piece of software', far from it. It has had its problems and those are being dealt with as SP1 was released and also SP2 when that is released. I also have to say that having used Windows 7 (pre-beta) on a daily basis this to hasn't even crashed for me and, let's be honest, one expects pre-beta and beta software to do just that - crash. -- -- John Barnett MVP Windows XP Associate Expert Windows Desktop Experience Web: http://xphelpandsupport.mvps.org Web: http://vistasupport.mvps.org Web: http://www.silversurfer-guide.com The information in this mail/post is supplied "as is". No warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, is made in relation to the accuracy, reliability or content of this mail/post. The Author shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising out of the use of, or inability to use, information or opinions expressed in this mail/post.. "Brian Kitt" wrote in message ... I have been a developer since early 80's. I've been disappointed, and re-disappointed year after year at the lower and lower quality of crap that Microsoft pushes on us. But Vista absolutely takes the cake. I've been running it for a year, and still get frustrated every single day about what a total worthless pile of crap this is. Why can't Microsoft stop spening money trying to convince people this piece of trash is good, and spend some money trying to do R&D and fix this. I'm sick and tired of constant crashes, lockups, and hanging. This is the most worthless piece of software Microsoft has ever developed. |
|
|||
|
John Barnett MVP wrote:
I've run Vista since early beta and maybe I've been lucky but I haven't had a single crash. I admit that I always said Vista was released too early - now that has been acknowledged. It certainly isn't, as you put it, ' a worthless piece of software', far from it. It has had its problems and those are being dealt with as SP1 was released and also SP2 when that is released. I also have to say that having used Windows 7 (pre-beta) on a daily basis this to hasn't even crashed for me and, let's be honest, one expects pre-beta and beta software to do just that - crash. I'm with you John. I've been computing since Win 3.11 and Vista home premium is the most solid I have ever used. I quit XP because of the crashes. With Vista, 21 months and not a single crash. I remember maybe 3 times I experienced a non-responsive program that had to be closed and re-opened. I think the problem lies with the individual computer makers since there are certain manufacturers names that you don't hear much on these forums. HP is one. Toshiba is read almost every day. -- Dave T. You can't imagine the extra work I had when I was a god. - Hirohito, Emporer of Japan |
|
|||
|
I found my way here because my new laptop is
constantly crashing. You name it, explorer...sidebar, every time I try to load a photo. Don't take any suggestions but this: TAKE IT BACK! Get it mended, or your money back. It isn't Vista that's a P.O.S., it's the manufacturer of your laptop. SteveT |
|
|||
|
THAT IS the ONLY response that matters
"Steve Thackery" wrote in message ... I found my way here because my new laptop is constantly crashing. You name it, explorer...sidebar, every time I try to load a photo. Don't take any suggestions but this: TAKE IT BACK! Get it mended, or your money back. It isn't Vista that's a P.O.S., it's the manufacturer of your laptop. SteveT |
|
|||
|
In message DonQ
was claimed to have wrote: On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:53:57 -0800, DevilsPGD wrote: I've got a Toshiba here and it runs Vista Business x86 beautifully after having reinstalled Vista from clean media. My Toshiba is fine with only cleaning out the pre-installed crap. Some are, some aren't -- Some of the pre-installed crap doesn't clean nicely, especially with regards to some of their earlier attempts to install drivers. Flattening and starting over takes so much less time then manually removing what you don't want and then upgrading drivers that I've never spent much time trying to clean. |
|
|||
|
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 16:04:49 -0800, DevilsPGD
wrote: In message DonQ was claimed to have wrote: On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:53:57 -0800, DevilsPGD wrote: I've got a Toshiba here and it runs Vista Business x86 beautifully after having reinstalled Vista from clean media. My Toshiba is fine with only cleaning out the pre-installed crap. Some are, some aren't -- Some of the pre-installed crap doesn't clean nicely, especially with regards to some of their earlier attempts to install drivers. Flattening and starting over takes so much less time then manually removing what you don't want and then upgrading drivers that I've never spent much time trying to clean. Flattening and starting over is only possible when one has an installation disc that isn't a recovery disc. That's a situation that is becoming more and more rare. Don |