![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hi,
I have a new Vista Home Premium 64-bit system, and would prefer to keep it as clean as possible. I recently had to try out a number (probably 6 to 8) of programs for editing my website (I previously used Adobe PageMill 3.0, which wouldn't install on Vista 64-bit, no matter what options I tried!!), and finding all of them (so far) unsuitable, uninstalled them. I did a search through the Registry, and there is quite a bit of "debris" left over from them. You'd think today's programs would be a little more conscientious about cleaning up after themselves.... In any case, how safe is it to delete any/all references to the uninstalled programs? I guess my OCD is showing here, as it irks me to have this junk in my registry. The system is performing well, but I wonder how much bloat will eventually hamper performance... Or am I just worrying about nothing - just ignore it?? I'm reasonably comfortable editing the registry when I know precisely what I'm doing, but am certainly not "literate" in the workings of the Registry. Thanks. -- Don remove "lens cap" for email P.S. And if anybody happens to know any tricks to get Adobe PageMill 3.0 installed on a 64-bit Vista system, I'd be very interested. It's such an old program (probably 7 years, if not more) that none of the Compatibility modes available made any difference - I couldn't get the install to even start, with an error message appearing indicating a windows version incompatibility, or something like that. |
|
|||
|
Don Cohen wrote:
Hi, I have a new Vista Home Premium 64-bit system, and would prefer to keep it as clean as possible. I recently had to try out a number (probably 6 to 8) of programs for editing my website (I previously used Adobe PageMill 3.0, which wouldn't install on Vista 64-bit, no matter what options I tried!!), and finding all of them (so far) unsuitable, uninstalled them. I did a search through the Registry, and there is quite a bit of "debris" left over from them. You'd think today's programs would be a little more conscientious about cleaning up after themselves.... In any case, how safe is it to delete any/all references to the uninstalled programs? I guess my OCD is showing here, as it irks me to have this junk in my registry. The system is performing well, but I wonder how much bloat will eventually hamper performance... Or am I just worrying about nothing - just ignore it?? I'm reasonably comfortable editing the registry when I know precisely what I'm doing, but am certainly not "literate" in the workings of the Registry. It's fine to delete the entries for uninstalled programs but not necessary. The extra entries will not hamper performance in the slightest. What you should *not* do is use a registry cleaner. Since you're OK working in the registry manually, do that if you are so inclined. Just be careful in there. ;-) http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?t=28099 - why not to use registry cleaners Malke -- MS-MVP Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic! FAQ - http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ |
|
|||
|
Thanks for the quick reply, Malke.
"Malke" wrote in message ... It's fine to delete the entries for uninstalled programs but not necessary. The extra entries will not hamper performance in the slightest. What you should *not* do is use a registry cleaner. Since you're OK working in the registry manually, do that if you are so inclined. Just be careful in there. ;-) http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?t=28099 - why not to use registry cleaners Yeah, I've heard bad things about registry cleaners, and haven't gone that way so far. Point well taken. I guess for the time being, I'll just leave well enough alone. If it doesn't hurt performance, and I imagine has a negligible impact on the size of the registry, what's the point? Best, -- Don remove "lens cap" for email |
|
|||
|
Indeed. Unlike the Win9x line, "dead" entries in the registry have no impact
on the system and performance. Bloat, as it were, is immaterial. -- Best of Luck, Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ Windows help - www.rickrogers.org My thoughts http://rick-mvp.blogspot.com "Don Cohen" wrote in message ... Thanks for the quick reply, Malke. "Malke" wrote in message ... It's fine to delete the entries for uninstalled programs but not necessary. The extra entries will not hamper performance in the slightest. What you should *not* do is use a registry cleaner. Since you're OK working in the registry manually, do that if you are so inclined. Just be careful in there. ;-) http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?t=28099 - why not to use registry cleaners Yeah, I've heard bad things about registry cleaners, and haven't gone that way so far. Point well taken. I guess for the time being, I'll just leave well enough alone. If it doesn't hurt performance, and I imagine has a negligible impact on the size of the registry, what's the point? Best, -- Don remove "lens cap" for email |