![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Networking with Windows Vista Networking issues and questions with Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
In my XP days I would assign each of my laptop's network adapters (wired and
wireless) its own static IP address. I did this to make it easier to manage things like opening certain ports when using the laptop for gaming over the wired connection only. Now that I have an all Vista home network consisting of a laptop and a desktop both with Vista Home Premium I am running into trouble assigning these static IPs on the laptop. The primary connection is the wireless and i use the wired connection to game or to transfer files across the network. When I go to set the IP on the wired connection I get the message: "Warning: Multiple default gateways are intended to provide redundancy to a single network such as and Intranet or the Internet. They will not function properly when the gateways are on two separate, disjoint networks (such as one on your intranet and one on the Internet). Do you want to save this configuration?" Now the default gateway is the same for both connections, my FIOS router, if I force my way past the above message and set up the IP I can no longer connect to the internet with the wired connection. Does Vista allow you to define the default gateway on only ONE of your adapters? I'm wondering if I just set the IP and subnet but leave the default gateway field blank would it work? Like I said this is with a FIOS actiontec mi424wr router and I am trying to set it up like this: Wireless adapter: IP 192.168.1.3, subnet mask 255.255.255.0, gateway 192.168.1.1, DNS server 192.168.1.1 Wired adapter: IP 192.168.1.4, subnet 255.255.255.0, gateway 192.168.1.1, DNS 192.168.1.1 It's not a big deal to just use DHCP for one of the connections but I am just curious if this is an error or just some new functionality in Vista that was not present in XP Thanks |
|
|||
|
Hi
I am not familiar with FIOS per-se-se but Static IP in Vista should work the same as in XP. The menus look a little nicer, and the way to get them is different, but the principle is the same. Using DHCP usually makes it easier to maintain the Network. The best solution is to get a Cable/DSL Router that doses DHCP Reservation (Aka Static DHCP). With such Router you can reserve IP to specific computers so though they are on DHCP they always get the same IP. Many Entry Level Wireless Router can do this. Jack (MS, MVP-Networking). "Nih" wrote in message ... In my XP days I would assign each of my laptop's network adapters (wired and wireless) its own static IP address. I did this to make it easier to manage things like opening certain ports when using the laptop for gaming over the wired connection only. Now that I have an all Vista home network consisting of a laptop and a desktop both with Vista Home Premium I am running into trouble assigning these static IPs on the laptop. The primary connection is the wireless and i use the wired connection to game or to transfer files across the network. When I go to set the IP on the wired connection I get the message: "Warning: Multiple default gateways are intended to provide redundancy to a single network such as and Intranet or the Internet. They will not function properly when the gateways are on two separate, disjoint networks (such as one on your intranet and one on the Internet). Do you want to save this configuration?" Now the default gateway is the same for both connections, my FIOS router, if I force my way past the above message and set up the IP I can no longer connect to the internet with the wired connection. Does Vista allow you to define the default gateway on only ONE of your adapters? I'm wondering if I just set the IP and subnet but leave the default gateway field blank would it work? Like I said this is with a FIOS actiontec mi424wr router and I am trying to set it up like this: Wireless adapter: IP 192.168.1.3, subnet mask 255.255.255.0, gateway 192.168.1.1, DNS server 192.168.1.1 Wired adapter: IP 192.168.1.4, subnet 255.255.255.0, gateway 192.168.1.1, DNS 192.168.1.1 It's not a big deal to just use DHCP for one of the connections but I am just curious if this is an error or just some new functionality in Vista that was not present in XP Thanks |
|
|||
|
"Jack (MVP-Networking)." wrote: Hi I am not familiar with FIOS per-se-se but Static IP in Vista should work the same as in XP. What I am trying to say is it ISN'T working the same way as XP, by any chance do you have both wired and wireless network adapters on the same machine so you could try to assign the IPs like I described and see what you get for a result? It's not FIOS issue, this is a warning/error from within windows. I am using the same router as when I had an all XP network and did not have this issue |
|
|||
|
Nih wrote:
"Jack (MVP-Networking)." wrote: Hi I am not familiar with FIOS per-se-se but Static IP in Vista should work the same as in XP. What I am trying to say is it ISN'T working the same way as XP, by any chance do you have both wired and wireless network adapters on the same machine so you could try to assign the IPs like I described and see what you get for a result? It's not FIOS issue, this is a warning/error from within windows. I am using the same router as when I had an all XP network and did not have this issue I tried it with my Vista laptop -- wired and wireless. After numerous error messages and oddly-behaved network connections I gave it a pass and leave both interfaces set for DHCP for now. Maybe some day when I'm in a sufficiently Zen mood I'll give it a go again. Good luck with it. Maybe someone will come up with an answer that works for both of us. -- John McGaw http://johnmcgaw.com |