![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I have two fairly new (14 months and 10 months) Dell Inspiron 530 desktops.
Both run Vista Home Premium 32-bit. Not networked. The only hardware differences between the two is in the processor and ram - one is a core 2 duo with 2 GB ram; the other is a core 2 quad with 4 GB ram. The quad, right from the start, has always been quick to shut down - about 12 seconds after the Shutting Down screen appears. The duo, on the other hand, has always been slow to shut down - about 120 seconds. Is there some diagnostic information I can pull from each system to compare? It seems I'm in a good position to troubleshoot the slow shutdown with this arrangement, but I can't quite figure out how to pull it all together. Any suggestions would be appreciated...very appreciated. |
|
|||
|
Mike Moran wrote:
I have two fairly new (14 months and 10 months) Dell Inspiron 530 desktops. Both run Vista Home Premium 32-bit. Not networked. The only hardware differences between the two is in the processor and ram - one is a core 2 duo with 2 GB ram; the other is a core 2 quad with 4 GB ram. The quad, right from the start, has always been quick to shut down - about 12 seconds after the Shutting Down screen appears. The duo, on the other hand, has always been slow to shut down - about 120 seconds. Is there some diagnostic information I can pull from each system to compare? It seems I'm in a good position to troubleshoot the slow shutdown with this arrangement, but I can't quite figure out how to pull it all together. Any suggestions would be appreciated...very appreciated. Shutdown issues are generally caused by a program and/or process that is refusing to exit gracefully. The program and/or process can be from malware or can be legitimate (such as an invasive antivirus like Norton or McAfee). If you are using a Norton or McAfee product, uninstall it and replace with a better program such as NOD32, Kasperksy, or Avast (free). The Windows Firewall is adequate for most people. With Vista, shutdown issues can also be caused by old/poorly written drivers so make sure all drivers are updated. See Step B. below for general driver directions. A.The first step is always to make sure your computer is virus/malware free. http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/...moving_Malware B. Drivers - The First Law of Driver Updates is "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". Normally if everything is working you want to leave things as they are. The exception is that heavy-duty gamers will usually want to update their video and sound drivers to squeeze every last bit of performance out of the hardware to get the fastest frame rates. If you're not one of those people, you don't need to update your drivers if there are no problems you are trying to solve. Never get drivers from Windows Update. Get them from: 1. The device mftr.'s website; OR 2. The motherboard mftr.'s website if hardware is onboard; OR 3. The OEM's website for your specific machine if you have an OEM computer (HP, Dell, Sony, etc.). In your case, you would only get drivers from Dell. Read the installation instructions on the website where you get the drivers. To find out what hardware is in your computer: 1. Read any documentation you got when you bought the computer. 2. If the computer is OEM, go to the OEM's website for your specific model machine and look at the specs (you'll be there to get the drivers anyway) 3. Download, install and run a free system inventory program like Belarc Advisor or System Information for Windows. http://www.belarc.com/free_download.html - Belarc Advisor http://www.gtopala.com/ - System Information for Windows C. If the computer is virus/malware-free, drivers are current, and no Norton or McAfee programs are installed, then do clean-boot troubleshooting to see which program/process is the culprit: How to perform a clean boot in Vista and XP - http://support.microsoft.com/kb/331796 D. If you need more information, here is an excellent shutdown troubleshooter: http://www.aumha.org/win5/a/shtdwnxp.htm Malke -- MS-MVP Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic! FAQ - http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ |
|
|||
|
"Mike Moran" wrote in message ... I have two fairly new (14 months and 10 months) Dell Inspiron 530 desktops. Both run Vista Home Premium 32-bit. Not networked. The only hardware differences between the two is in the processor and ram - one is a core 2 duo with 2 GB ram; the other is a core 2 quad with 4 GB ram. The quad, right from the start, has always been quick to shut down - about 12 seconds after the Shutting Down screen appears. The duo, on the other hand, has always been slow to shut down - about 120 seconds. Is there some diagnostic information I can pull from each system to compare? It seems I'm in a good position to troubleshoot the slow shutdown with this arrangement, but I can't quite figure out how to pull it all together. Any suggestions would be appreciated...very appreciated. |
|
|||
|
"Mike Moran" wrote in message ... I have two fairly new (14 months and 10 months) Dell Inspiron 530 desktops. Both run Vista Home Premium 32-bit. Not networked. The only hardware differences between the two is in the processor and ram - one is a core 2 duo with 2 GB ram; the other is a core 2 quad with 4 GB ram. The quad, right from the start, has always been quick to shut down - about 12 seconds after the Shutting Down screen appears. The duo, on the other hand, has always been slow to shut down - about 120 seconds. Is there some diagnostic information I can pull from each system to compare? It seems I'm in a good position to troubleshoot the slow shutdown with this arrangement, but I can't quite figure out how to pull it all together. Any suggestions would be appreciated...very appreciated. Turns out, I was clearing the pagefile on shutdown. Disabling that option took care of the problem: "Disable : "clear page file on shutdown" option, if enabled. Cleaning the pagefile on every shutdown means overwriting the data by zeros, and it takes time. To clear/not clear page file you can apply this reg tweak. Back up registry before trying this. Start Run Regedit GotoHKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ CurrentControlSet\ Control\ Session Manager\ Memory Management. Modify (if not present, rt click in open space and create) the Value Data Type/s and Value Name/s : Data Type: REG_DWORD [Dword Value] Value Name: ClearPageFileAtShutdown Setting for Value Data: [0 = Clear Page File Disabled / 1 = Clear Page File Enabled] Exit Registry and Reboot." |
|
|||
|
There is a bit of information available on shutdown in Event Viewer, check
Custom Views, Shutdown Problems. Source: Diagnostics-Performance, Event ID 20x, Task Category: Shutdown Performance Michael "Mike Moran" wrote in message ... "Mike Moran" wrote in message ... I have two fairly new (14 months and 10 months) Dell Inspiron 530 desktops. Both run Vista Home Premium 32-bit. Not networked. The only hardware differences between the two is in the processor and ram - one is a core 2 duo with 2 GB ram; the other is a core 2 quad with 4 GB ram. The quad, right from the start, has always been quick to shut down - about 12 seconds after the Shutting Down screen appears. The duo, on the other hand, has always been slow to shut down - about 120 seconds. Is there some diagnostic information I can pull from each system to compare? It seems I'm in a good position to troubleshoot the slow shutdown with this arrangement, but I can't quite figure out how to pull it all together. Any suggestions would be appreciated...very appreciated. Turns out, I was clearing the pagefile on shutdown. Disabling that option took care of the problem: "Disable : "clear page file on shutdown" option, if enabled. Cleaning the pagefile on every shutdown means overwriting the data by zeros, and it takes time. To clear/not clear page file you can apply this reg tweak. Back up registry before trying this. Start Run Regedit GotoHKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ CurrentControlSet\ Control\ Session Manager\ Memory Management. Modify (if not present, rt click in open space and create) the Value Data Type/s and Value Name/s : Data Type: REG_DWORD [Dword Value] Value Name: ClearPageFileAtShutdown Setting for Value Data: [0 = Clear Page File Disabled / 1 = Clear Page File Enabled] Exit Registry and Reboot." |
|
|||
|
I had a similar shutdown problem with a Dell XPS
I read an article that suggested uncheck the system management, set any page file settings to zero, reboot, delete any remaining page files left on your drives, reboot again and then enable system management of the memory again. It worked for me - page file clears itself on shutdown and creates a new one on startup Hope it helps Andy "Michael Walraven" wrote in message ... There is a bit of information available on shutdown in Event Viewer, check Custom Views, Shutdown Problems. Source: Diagnostics-Performance, Event ID 20x, Task Category: Shutdown Performance Michael "Mike Moran" wrote in message ... "Mike Moran" wrote in message ... I have two fairly new (14 months and 10 months) Dell Inspiron 530 desktops. Both run Vista Home Premium 32-bit. Not networked. The only hardware differences between the two is in the processor and ram - one is a core 2 duo with 2 GB ram; the other is a core 2 quad with 4 GB ram. The quad, right from the start, has always been quick to shut down - about 12 seconds after the Shutting Down screen appears. The duo, on the other hand, has always been slow to shut down - about 120 seconds. Is there some diagnostic information I can pull from each system to compare? It seems I'm in a good position to troubleshoot the slow shutdown with this arrangement, but I can't quite figure out how to pull it all together. Any suggestions would be appreciated...very appreciated. Turns out, I was clearing the pagefile on shutdown. Disabling that option took care of the problem: "Disable : "clear page file on shutdown" option, if enabled. Cleaning the pagefile on every shutdown means overwriting the data by zeros, and it takes time. To clear/not clear page file you can apply this reg tweak. Back up registry before trying this. Start Run Regedit GotoHKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ CurrentControlSet\ Control\ Session Manager\ Memory Management. Modify (if not present, rt click in open space and create) the Value Data Type/s and Value Name/s : Data Type: REG_DWORD [Dword Value] Value Name: ClearPageFileAtShutdown Setting for Value Data: [0 = Clear Page File Disabled / 1 = Clear Page File Enabled] Exit Registry and Reboot." |
|
|||
|
I have a lot of experience of the many, many bugs of Vista and the
various machines that run it. Mary Jo Foley is an excellent Microsoft "spotter". Here is her home page: http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/ She says in one of her blogs that Microsoft are anxious to avoid the "disinformation on the Internet", but are THEMSELVES the source of that disinformation. Their "updates" are supposed to meet the special wishes of the customers. However, I found 42 separate "knowledge bases" (KB) on the Microsoft site, all aimed at patching some of Microsoft's dud code. The special wishes of the customers are simply for a system that WORKS. Using System Function 66, Subfunction 2, my own machine-code program for antialiased line-drawing found the file size. There is no other way. The file-size was wrong. I took a commercial graphics program to determine the filesize of a BMP file, and it reported that it was MINUS one BILLION, 285 MILLION, 230 THOUSAND and 262 BYTES. Vista LIED to the commercial software and to mine. This shows that the bugs are deep in the BIOS of the Vista operating system. It is rotten to the CORE. There is a mathematical concept known as "die Mengenlehre" in German, translated as "Set Theory" into English. However, it is not theory. An operating system consists of a huge "set" of subroutines. In Vista, many are broken. The only solution is to find a "subset" of those routines, that are NOT broken. Any patch must use the safe subset. You cannot write massive programs, that rely on the full set - broken and unbroken - to repair the system. On the Microsoft site, they offer "Service Pack 1". This takes a massive 455 megabytes - enough space to contain perhaps ten complete operating systems. Not only that, it does not load. So it is all in vain. Similarly with the "Knowledge Bases". The various KB-numbers for the "updates" contain such things as an "update that enables future updates". So Microsoft have discovered that their "updates" do not work. They should have noticed that BEFORE they launched 42 of them on the Internet, not AFTER. Indeed, they should TEST their "products". They should have tested Vista. They should have tested the "updates". They should test everything. They are obviously unaware, by analogy, that you cannot use a car without an engine to drive off to fetch an engine. You cannot use a car without fuel to drive off to fetch fuel. There is a "set" of vital parts, like engine and fuel that make the driving possible. So the "update to enable updates" cannot be an "update". Like Lord Russell's "set of all sets", which is a "superset", so an "update to enable updates" has to be a "super-update" that uses only safe subroutines. These things announce themselves as "standalone programs". However, Microsoft has grown so accustomed to writing programs that run UNDER an operating system that they have lost the plot. An "update" that runs under a buggy BIOS is not "standalone". Ergo, it is not a "super- update". Part of the disinformation Mary-Jo Foley speaks of relates to who's to BLAME. Here we see the official Microsoft blame-shifting: http://gizmodo.com/373076/nvidia-res...rashes-in-2007 It is an invidious slander of NVIDIA to say that they are RESPONSIBLE for 28.8% of all crashes. Just because 28.8% of all video cards are NVIDIA does not prove that they are GUILTY of the Vista crashes. ONE HUNDRED PERCENT of all machines showing Vista crashes were running Vista. My own experience of Vista on several Dells, each with an NVIDIA card is that they did indeed crash. However, there was no evidence of a VIDEO crash. THE FIRST THING TO DO IS TO DISABLE THE UPDATES. Several machines I was trying were crashing out of regular programs to "configure updates". All data that had been entered was lost. They always hung for a time saying "section 2 of 3, 28% completed" and then "section 3 of 3, 98% completed". They even claimed to be fetching "updates" when there was no way whatever that the machine could contact the Internet. It was totally OFF-LINE. One of the KB "updates" is said to address an irregularity in the handling of the "servicing store", which interferes with the installation of "updates", "Service Packs" and programs. I take it that the "servicing store" is the modem buffer, with the pointer set to a special place where the "servicing" data will be stored. Anyway, if it is not on the Internet it is taking RANDOM BYTES from the "servicing store" and scattering them around the operating system. In this way, the number of broken subroutines INCREASES instead of being reduced. So the automatic updating system, being flawed, acts as a "Trojan virus". The original bugs cause the system to corrupt itself further. The closest I came to a useable operating system was what I got when I disabled the automatic updates. However. And here is the joke. For FIVE DAYS after I disabled the automatic updates, it continued to pretend that it was fetching updates. Only after five days did it notice. Thereafter, it keeps sneaking a window into my line-of-sight encouraging me to switch them back on, or download "updates" manually. I downloaded many "updates" using XP, into an SD card. I virus-checked them and tried to run them. NONE WORKED. So much for Microsoft and its world monopoly of IBM-compatible systems. Charles Douglas Wehner |