![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance) |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Success noted!!!
"Diamontina Cocktail" wrote in message ... "AJR" wrote in message ... Bootvis was created for use by developers and not "general use" - actual benefits required changes in coding. Main function with XP was the representation of the boot process and, despite impressions, did little during the boot adjustment phase. Your conclusion is incorrect. A completely defragmented system on a reasonably new machine could take a long time to boot depending on what the user had done. One such system, 6 months old and a 3.2Ghz P4 socket 775 was taking up to 15 minutes to boot. Bootvis brought it back to normal. That was the most outstanding example I had presented to me and fixed but there were improvements over most machines in boot performance. |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|