A Windows Vista forum. Vista Banter

Welcome to Vista Banter.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

Go Back   Home » Vista Banter forum » Microsoft Windows Vista » Networking with Windows Vista
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Networking with Windows Vista Networking issues and questions with Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing)

Member limitation for Vista Workgroup



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old April 23rd 09, 09:02 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing
Chris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 507
Default Member limitation for Vista Workgroup

Hi

I started my MCITP training. Our trainer told us, that there is a limit of
maximum 25 Vista clients in a Vista workgroup. Is this correct? From my point
of knowledge, there is only a limitation of 10 concurrent incomming
connections. There is no limitation on the number of members in a workgroup.
I know, a workgroup with above 20 clients for file- and printsharing makes
no sence, but is there a limitation?

Special thanks for your feedback.
chris
  #2 (permalink)  
Old April 23rd 09, 11:32 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing
Malke[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,230
Default Member limitation for Vista Workgroup

chris wrote:

Hi

I started my MCITP training. Our trainer told us, that there is a limit of
maximum 25 Vista clients in a Vista workgroup. Is this correct? From my
point of knowledge, there is only a limitation of 10 concurrent incomming
connections. There is no limitation on the number of members in a
workgroup. I know, a workgroup with above 20 clients for file- and
printsharing makes no sence, but is there a limitation?


You are correct and your trainer is wrong. It would be foolish to have a
workgroup with 25 workstations - you would really want a server and a
domain - but that isn't because of any limitation on the number of machines
that can be on a network. And there are no "clients" in a Workgroup. By its
nature, a Workgroup consists of peer workstations. "Client" means a server
is involved.

Malke
--
MS-MVP
Elephant Boy Computers - Don't Panic!
http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/#FAQ

  #3 (permalink)  
Old April 23rd 09, 11:53 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing
Gordon[_9_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,183
Default Member limitation for Vista Workgroup

"chris" wrote in message
...
Hi

I started my MCITP training. Our trainer told us, that there is a limit of
maximum 25 Vista clients in a Vista workgroup. Is this correct? From my
point
of knowledge, there is only a limitation of 10 concurrent incomming
connections. There is no limitation on the number of members in a
workgroup.
I know, a workgroup with above 20 clients for file- and printsharing makes
no sence, but is there a limitation?

Special thanks for your feedback.
chris




To add to what Malke said - in a peer-to-peer workgroup, all security (i.e.
log-on credentials) information is held on each local machine. Therefore if
you have a workgroup of 25, you would need to create (and administer) 25
Users with 25 passwords on EACH of the 25 machines, assuming all 25 need
access to all the other machines.
Hence a server is far more practical over about 4 or 5 machines...

--
Asking a question?
Please tell us the version of the application you are asking about,
your OS, Service Pack level
and the FULL contents of any error message(s)

  #4 (permalink)  
Old April 23rd 09, 12:46 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing
Chris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 507
Default Member limitation for Vista Workgroup

Thanks for your immediate answers. Now, I'm reassured.

regards
chris

"Gordon" wrote:

"chris" wrote in message
...
Hi

I started my MCITP training. Our trainer told us, that there is a limit of
maximum 25 Vista clients in a Vista workgroup. Is this correct? From my
point
of knowledge, there is only a limitation of 10 concurrent incomming
connections. There is no limitation on the number of members in a
workgroup.
I know, a workgroup with above 20 clients for file- and printsharing makes
no sence, but is there a limitation?

Special thanks for your feedback.
chris




To add to what Malke said - in a peer-to-peer workgroup, all security (i.e.
log-on credentials) information is held on each local machine. Therefore if
you have a workgroup of 25, you would need to create (and administer) 25
Users with 25 passwords on EACH of the 25 machines, assuming all 25 need
access to all the other machines.
Hence a server is far more practical over about 4 or 5 machines...

--
Asking a question?
Please tell us the version of the application you are asking about,
your OS, Service Pack level
and the FULL contents of any error message(s)


  #5 (permalink)  
Old April 24th 09, 06:28 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing
Bill Kearney
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 77
Default Member limitation for Vista Workgroup


"chris" wrote in message
...
Thanks for your immediate answers. Now, I'm reassured.


Don't be, what else is the trainer getting wrong?

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright ©2004-2012 Vista Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.