![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
"Ashton Crusher" wrote in message ... On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:14:24 -0400, +Bob+ wrote: On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:04:39 -0700, Ashton Crusher wrote: I understand your desire to watch colors change on the screen but the built in defrager works fine if you use it as defraging is intended to be used - as an out of sight/out of mind background task. I set it up that way 18 months ago and I have never even noticed it running since then. Background defrag is a waste of performance you could be using in the foreground. Not to mention, defragging a disk is a moderately risky operation on the drive. Doing it while foreground tasks are running is not very smart. Well, if you think that's a risk worth worrying about then no one should ever install any programs on their computer since program installs trash far more systems then a background defrager ever has. If you run the built in defrag as it's intended it simply is always doing little bits of clean up and there is no need for it to take over the system like the store bought ones do so that people can look at the pretty little squares changing colors - been there, did that, am over it. Practically speaking, just running a defrag on a set schedule and preferably when you won't be using it is the best advice. I do that with my various back-ups and security sweeps. However, there's more information in these other defrag programs than watching the lights blink, such as listing files that won't defrag. When hiberfil.sys came up on a manual defrag of my laptop as a file that could not be defragged, I deleted it and recovered quite a bit of space. I had hibernation turned off but didn't realize that it already had created a whopping useless file. Deleting it also allowed the defragger to pack more files into the first band of written clusters. I'm sure the performance increase was trivial, but the recovered space on a relatively small laptop HD was worth doing. Seeing the list of undefraggable files also taught me that in order to squeeze the absolute most out of defragging, shut down every (and I do mean every) other app before defragging. An open program can put a hold on auxiliary files it creates while running and the defragger won't touch them. Again, the effect is small but if you're not using the computer, why not shut down everything? Perusing the other undefraggable/unmovable files and the pretty squares also can be instructive as to what's happening "under the hood". For example, most writes are done in two bands, one starting at the beginning of the HD, and another band starting at about the middle of the drive. This must be a deliberate write strategy. Otherwise, used clusters would be randomly strewn across the drive. I've also backtracked undefraggable/unmovable files to one or two resource-consuming processes that I didn't need and could be terminated. |