|
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
July 30th 09, 12:45 AM
posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.general,microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
|
|||
|
|||
Vista Defragmenter
vistostimorth wrote:
Manfred Nathanal Hollingsworth wrote: Gordon wrote: "+Bob+" wrote in message ... On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:27:25 +0100, "Gordon" wrote: And it does slow down after time. But that is NOT, in general, due to a fragmented HDD! Defragging makes very little difference, in general, to system performance. Inaccurate. On some systems it makes a tremendous difference. It depends entirely on how much activity (add/delete) the disk drive sees. Not inaccurate at all. In general, most users will notice only very slight improvements by defragging. Speed depends on many factors of which an unfragged HDD is a very small one... Err sigh you don't know what most users will notice unless Err sigh you spoke with most users. Err sigh you are sighing.. frank must be giving you his bone... No i dont mean his microscopic dick, rather a real bone... got it bonehead? Not really. Can you explain in great detail? Just FYI. 
|
Linear Mode
