![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance) |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hello!
Setting 'System managed' page file for my d: drive (EIDE Samsung SP2514N on JMicron JMB363 PATA and SATA controller on my Asus P5K motherboard) causes explorer.exe to use about 90% of CPU after a restart for several minutes and in about 10 minutes intervals during 720p video playback in VLC Player for several minutes. RAM 6GB, CPU Intel E6750. Vista Ultimate x64. I have set 'no page file' for my d: drive (EIDE Samsung SP2514N on my Asus P5K motherboard) and the problem disappeared. Why does setting page file for my d: drive cause the high CPU usage? My d: drive is least frequently used. I have not changed 'System managed' for my G: drive. I have set 'System managed' for my c: drive (WD5005000AACS ATA) too, and the problem have not reappeared. Regards, Dima |
|
|||
|
"Dima" wrote in message ... Hello! Setting 'System managed' page file for my d: drive (EIDE Samsung SP2514N on JMicron JMB363 PATA and SATA controller on my Asus P5K motherboard) causes explorer.exe to use about 90% of CPU after a restart for several minutes and in about 10 minutes intervals during 720p video playback in VLC Player for several minutes. RAM 6GB, CPU Intel E6750. Vista Ultimate x64. I have set 'no page file' for my d: drive (EIDE Samsung SP2514N on my Asus P5K motherboard) and the problem disappeared. Why does setting page file for my d: drive cause the high CPU usage? My d: drive is least frequently used. I have not changed 'System managed' for my G: drive. I have set 'System managed' for my c: drive (WD5005000AACS ATA) too, and the problem have not reappeared. Regards, Dima You only need ONE page file for your entire system - you do NOT need one for each drive......and if these drives are partitions and not physically-separate hard disks then there's no advantage in moving the page file from C drive either.... |
|
|||
|
Thanks Gordon for your reply!
I have 3 HDDs: 2 SATA: C: and G: and one EIDE d:. I do not have logical partitions. MS writes that Windows uses a page file on a less busy HDD at a time. The busyness changes over time, therefore MS recomends to spread a page file over all phisical HDDs. What program can assess performance with different locations of a page file? I want to compare different locations of a page file. Regards, Dima "Gordon" wrote: "Dima" wrote in message ... Hello! Setting 'System managed' page file for my d: drive (EIDE Samsung SP2514N on JMicron JMB363 PATA and SATA controller on my Asus P5K motherboard) causes explorer.exe to use about 90% of CPU after a restart for several minutes and in about 10 minutes intervals during 720p video playback in VLC Player for several minutes. RAM 6GB, CPU Intel E6750. Vista Ultimate x64. I have set 'no page file' for my d: drive (EIDE Samsung SP2514N on my Asus P5K motherboard) and the problem disappeared. Why does setting page file for my d: drive cause the high CPU usage? My d: drive is least frequently used. I have not changed 'System managed' for my G: drive. I have set 'System managed' for my c: drive (WD5005000AACS ATA) too, and the problem have not reappeared. Regards, Dima You only need ONE page file for your entire system - you do NOT need one for each drive......and if these drives are partitions and not physically-separate hard disks then there's no advantage in moving the page file from C drive either.... |
|
|||
|
"Dima" wrote in message ... Thanks Gordon for your reply! I have 3 HDDs: 2 SATA: C: and G: and one EIDE d:. I do not have logical partitions. MS writes that Windows uses a page file on a less busy HDD at a time. The busyness changes over time, therefore MS recomends to spread a page file over all phisical HDDs. Never heard that one before - can you post a link to that? |
|
|||
|
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314482
"Gordon" wrote: "Dima" wrote in message ... Thanks Gordon for your reply! I have 3 HDDs: 2 SATA: C: and G: and one EIDE d:. I do not have logical partitions. MS writes that Windows uses a page file on a less busy HDD at a time. The busyness changes over time, therefore MS recomends to spread a page file over all phisical HDDs. Never heard that one before - can you post a link to that? |
|
|||
|
"Dima" wrote in message ... http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314482 Thanks. i suggest then that you create a very small page file on C for the memory dumps and create a partition on your least-utilised HDD purely dedicated to the second, windows-managed pagefile. (The article only mentioned TWO page files as above, not one on each drive....) |
|
|||
|
Thanks Gordon for your suggestion!
My least-utilised HDD is EIDE Samsung SP2514N on JMicron JMB363 PATA and SATA controller on my Asus P5K motherboard. Asus writes that EIDE controller works slower than SATA on Asus P5K motherboard. It looks like explorer.exe loads CPU more when a page file is on EIDE HDD. A least-utilised HDD changes over time: uTorrent seeds several-Gb-files and I play HD videos from C:, D: and G: HDDs alternately. If D: and G: HDDs are busy at the same time, its better to use a page file on C: HDD, therefore the C: page file should be normal sized. If only G: HDD is busy, its better to use a page file on d: HDD, because C: is a system HDD. Am I right? How to test performance of different page file locations? Regard, Dima "Gordon" wrote: "Dima" wrote in message ... http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314482 Thanks. i suggest then that you create a very small page file on C for the memory dumps and create a partition on your least-utilised HDD purely dedicated to the second, windows-managed pagefile. (The article only mentioned TWO page files as above, not one on each drive....) |
|
|||
|
"Dima" wrote in message ... How to test performance of different page file locations? Trial and error? |
|
|||
|
Thanks Gordon for replying!
Is there a software that evaluates PC performance including a page file usage? Why could explorer.exe use 95% of CPU time for minutes without a user input? Regards, Dima "Gordon" wrote: "Dima" wrote in message ... How to test performance of different page file locations? Trial and error? |
|
|||
|
"Dima" wrote in message ... Thanks Gordon for replying! Is there a software that evaluates PC performance including a page file usage? Why could explorer.exe use 95% of CPU time for minutes without a user input? I don't know. Have you tried googling "PC performance analysis software"? |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|