![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
The size of the corrupt autochk.exe file is about 100kb less than the correct
size for autochk.exe which is about 717kb. "Tae Song" wrote: "HMT" wrote in message ... SFC could not repair it. How do I take ownership and give myself permission? "." wrote: Only Trusted Installer can write to that file. You could take ownership and give yourself permission. Didn't SFC repair it? -- .. -- "HMT" wrote in message ... My Vista Premium will not run autochk.exe. I ran sfc/ scannow and the cbs log file found autochk.exe corrupt. I tried to copy autochk.exe from another Vista PC to the c:\windows\system 32 folder and it will not let me. I'm running as administrator and click continue when user account control pops up, but it won't copy. Any suggestions? There might not be a problem with AUTOCHK.EXE. If SFC says it can't repair something, it usually means the file-hash for file is corrupt in the registry. The way SFC detects corrupt files is by comparing the file-hash stored in the registry against the hash generated from the file. If they don't match, SFC copies a new copy from storage. Everything should be good then. But if the file-hash in the registry is corrupt or out of sync, the hash from the good copy still isn't going to match, so SFC will report it couldn't repair the problem. You don't need to worry about it too much unless it starts interfering with Windows operations. Usually, this means Windows Update which uses the file-hash in the registry to check what files you have installed. If you get error like 0x80073712 ERROR_SXS_COMPONENT_STORE_CORRUPT, you would have to go in and surgically remove the file-hash data in the registry to fix the problem. The problem being Window Update not being able to do updates on the files affected. The problem is not uncommon. |
|
|||
|
"HMT" wrote in message ... The size of the corrupt autochk.exe file is about 100kb less than the correct size for autochk.exe which is about 717kb. "Tae Song" wrote: "HMT" wrote in message ... SFC could not repair it. How do I take ownership and give myself permission? "." wrote: Only Trusted Installer can write to that file. You could take ownership and give yourself permission. Didn't SFC repair it? -- .. -- "HMT" wrote in message ... My Vista Premium will not run autochk.exe. I ran sfc/ scannow and the cbs log file found autochk.exe corrupt. I tried to copy autochk.exe from another Vista PC to the c:\windows\system 32 folder and it will not let me. I'm running as administrator and click continue when user account control pops up, but it won't copy. Any suggestions? There might not be a problem with AUTOCHK.EXE. If SFC says it can't repair something, it usually means the file-hash for file is corrupt in the registry. The way SFC detects corrupt files is by comparing the file-hash stored in the registry against the hash generated from the file. If they don't match, SFC copies a new copy from storage. Everything should be good then. But if the file-hash in the registry is corrupt or out of sync, the hash from the good copy still isn't going to match, so SFC will report it couldn't repair the problem. You don't need to worry about it too much unless it starts interfering with Windows operations. Usually, this means Windows Update which uses the file-hash in the registry to check what files you have installed. If you get error like 0x80073712 ERROR_SXS_COMPONENT_STORE_CORRUPT, you would have to go in and surgically remove the file-hash data in the registry to fix the problem. The problem being Window Update not being able to do updates on the files affected. The problem is not uncommon. Are you using Windows Vista Home Premium 64-bit? Directory of C:\Windows\System32 04/11/2009 12:22 PM 734,720 autochk.exe (717KB) Directory of C:\Windows\SysWOW64 04/11/2009 12:23 PM 643,072 autochk.exe (628KB) |
|
|||
|
"HMT" wrote in message ... The size of the corrupt autochk.exe file is about 100kb less than the correct size for autochk.exe which is about 717kb. "Tae Song" wrote: "HMT" wrote in message ... SFC could not repair it. How do I take ownership and give myself permission? "." wrote: Only Trusted Installer can write to that file. You could take ownership and give yourself permission. Didn't SFC repair it? -- .. -- "HMT" wrote in message ... My Vista Premium will not run autochk.exe. I ran sfc/ scannow and the cbs log file found autochk.exe corrupt. I tried to copy autochk.exe from another Vista PC to the c:\windows\system 32 folder and it will not let me. I'm running as administrator and click continue when user account control pops up, but it won't copy. Any suggestions? There might not be a problem with AUTOCHK.EXE. If SFC says it can't repair something, it usually means the file-hash for file is corrupt in the registry. The way SFC detects corrupt files is by comparing the file-hash stored in the registry against the hash generated from the file. If they don't match, SFC copies a new copy from storage. Everything should be good then. But if the file-hash in the registry is corrupt or out of sync, the hash from the good copy still isn't going to match, so SFC will report it couldn't repair the problem. You don't need to worry about it too much unless it starts interfering with Windows operations. Usually, this means Windows Update which uses the file-hash in the registry to check what files you have installed. If you get error like 0x80073712 ERROR_SXS_COMPONENT_STORE_CORRUPT, you would have to go in and surgically remove the file-hash data in the registry to fix the problem. The problem being Window Update not being able to do updates on the files affected. The problem is not uncommon. Are you using Windows Vista Home Premium 64-bit? Directory of C:\Windows\System32 04/11/2009 12:22 PM 734,720 autochk.exe (717KB) Directory of C:\Windows\SysWOW64 04/11/2009 12:23 PM 643,072 autochk.exe (628KB) |
|
|||
|
I discovered the different sizes yesterday. The copy I got was from Vista
Ultimate 64-bit and larger than the one I need for Vista Premium 32-bit. I'll ty and find someone with Vista Premium 32-bit and copy their autochk.exe. "Tae Song" wrote: "HMT" wrote in message ... The size of the corrupt autochk.exe file is about 100kb less than the correct size for autochk.exe which is about 717kb. "Tae Song" wrote: "HMT" wrote in message ... SFC could not repair it. How do I take ownership and give myself permission? "." wrote: Only Trusted Installer can write to that file. You could take ownership and give yourself permission. Didn't SFC repair it? -- .. -- "HMT" wrote in message ... My Vista Premium will not run autochk.exe. I ran sfc/ scannow and the cbs log file found autochk.exe corrupt. I tried to copy autochk.exe from another Vista PC to the c:\windows\system 32 folder and it will not let me. I'm running as administrator and click continue when user account control pops up, but it won't copy. Any suggestions? There might not be a problem with AUTOCHK.EXE. If SFC says it can't repair something, it usually means the file-hash for file is corrupt in the registry. The way SFC detects corrupt files is by comparing the file-hash stored in the registry against the hash generated from the file. If they don't match, SFC copies a new copy from storage. Everything should be good then. But if the file-hash in the registry is corrupt or out of sync, the hash from the good copy still isn't going to match, so SFC will report it couldn't repair the problem. You don't need to worry about it too much unless it starts interfering with Windows operations. Usually, this means Windows Update which uses the file-hash in the registry to check what files you have installed. If you get error like 0x80073712 ERROR_SXS_COMPONENT_STORE_CORRUPT, you would have to go in and surgically remove the file-hash data in the registry to fix the problem. The problem being Window Update not being able to do updates on the files affected. The problem is not uncommon. Are you using Windows Vista Home Premium 64-bit? Directory of C:\Windows\System32 04/11/2009 12:22 PM 734,720 autochk.exe (717KB) Directory of C:\Windows\SysWOW64 04/11/2009 12:23 PM 643,072 autochk.exe (628KB) |
|
|||
|
I discovered the different sizes yesterday. The copy I got was from Vista
Ultimate 64-bit and larger than the one I need for Vista Premium 32-bit. I'll ty and find someone with Vista Premium 32-bit and copy their autochk.exe. "Tae Song" wrote: "HMT" wrote in message ... The size of the corrupt autochk.exe file is about 100kb less than the correct size for autochk.exe which is about 717kb. "Tae Song" wrote: "HMT" wrote in message ... SFC could not repair it. How do I take ownership and give myself permission? "." wrote: Only Trusted Installer can write to that file. You could take ownership and give yourself permission. Didn't SFC repair it? -- .. -- "HMT" wrote in message ... My Vista Premium will not run autochk.exe. I ran sfc/ scannow and the cbs log file found autochk.exe corrupt. I tried to copy autochk.exe from another Vista PC to the c:\windows\system 32 folder and it will not let me. I'm running as administrator and click continue when user account control pops up, but it won't copy. Any suggestions? There might not be a problem with AUTOCHK.EXE. If SFC says it can't repair something, it usually means the file-hash for file is corrupt in the registry. The way SFC detects corrupt files is by comparing the file-hash stored in the registry against the hash generated from the file. If they don't match, SFC copies a new copy from storage. Everything should be good then. But if the file-hash in the registry is corrupt or out of sync, the hash from the good copy still isn't going to match, so SFC will report it couldn't repair the problem. You don't need to worry about it too much unless it starts interfering with Windows operations. Usually, this means Windows Update which uses the file-hash in the registry to check what files you have installed. If you get error like 0x80073712 ERROR_SXS_COMPONENT_STORE_CORRUPT, you would have to go in and surgically remove the file-hash data in the registry to fix the problem. The problem being Window Update not being able to do updates on the files affected. The problem is not uncommon. Are you using Windows Vista Home Premium 64-bit? Directory of C:\Windows\System32 04/11/2009 12:22 PM 734,720 autochk.exe (717KB) Directory of C:\Windows\SysWOW64 04/11/2009 12:23 PM 643,072 autochk.exe (628KB) |