A Windows Vista forum. Vista Banter

Welcome to Vista Banter.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

Go Back   Home » Vista Banter forum » Microsoft Windows Vista » Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance)

Can a Vista Startup Repair last 5 hours?



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old October 14th 09, 03:16 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
Ken Blake, MVP
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,309
Default Can a Vista Startup Repair last 5 hours?

On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:09:45 -0400, "SC Tom" wrote:


"Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:47:04 -0400, "SC Tom" wrote:


"Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:11:54 +0100, "John Harris"
wrote:

I began a Startup Repair more than five hours ago. Surely this can't
be
right. If I shut down and try to Restore to an Earlier Point, could
this
make things worse?


What do you mean by a "startup repair"? Exactly what did you do?


--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup

Read his first post at 10:44AM today. Or, better yet, he

"I installed SP1 onto a laptop and after about three quarters of an hour
into
the process, the laptop switched itself off. I restarted and got a choice
between Repair or Start Windows normally. "



Thanks, but for John Harris's benefit, let me explain several things:

1. If you start a new thread, rather than reply to an existing one,
it's exceedingly difficult for someone reading the message to
associate the two. Once you ask a question, all follow-up messages
should be by replying to the existing thread, not by posting a new
message.

2. If there was a previous message, and you don't quote any of it,
it's exceedingly difficult to associate the two. Many of us here (me,
for example) don't save already-read messages, and without a quote, a
message can be very hard to understand.

3. What you did is called a "repair installation," not a "startup
repair." I know that for many people, it's very hard to know what the
right terminology is, but I urge you to work hard to be sure you are
calling something by the correct name. If you don't do so, you run the
substantial risk that your question will not be understood. Worse, it
may be *misunderstood*, and you may therefore get the wrong answer. I
asked what you meant, rather than guessing, but some people will
guess, and some of them will guess wrong.

And one point for you: what you see as 10:44AM on your newsreader will
have a different time for everyone in a different time zone.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup


This is true. I should have said 10:44AM EDST :-)



That would have helped, but no big deal. I should said it was a
*minor* point.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup
  #12 (permalink)  
Old October 14th 09, 11:05 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
Bill Walsh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 63
Default Can a Vista Startup Repair last 5 hours?

Every thing you say is true, but the main question posted has not been
answered by anyone. By the way, Ken, I remember you from the Windows95 days
as one of the best
helpers for those of us who wander away from doing computer things properly.
Nice to see your name again. Bill Walsh
"Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:09:45 -0400, "SC Tom" wrote:


"Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:47:04 -0400, "SC Tom" wrote:


"Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:11:54 +0100, "John Harris"
wrote:

I began a Startup Repair more than five hours ago. Surely this
can't
be
right. If I shut down and try to Restore to an Earlier Point, could
this
make things worse?


What do you mean by a "startup repair"? Exactly what did you do?


--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup

Read his first post at 10:44AM today. Or, better yet, he

"I installed SP1 onto a laptop and after about three quarters of an
hour
into
the process, the laptop switched itself off. I restarted and got a
choice
between Repair or Start Windows normally. "


Thanks, but for John Harris's benefit, let me explain several things:

1. If you start a new thread, rather than reply to an existing one,
it's exceedingly difficult for someone reading the message to
associate the two. Once you ask a question, all follow-up messages
should be by replying to the existing thread, not by posting a new
message.

2. If there was a previous message, and you don't quote any of it,
it's exceedingly difficult to associate the two. Many of us here (me,
for example) don't save already-read messages, and without a quote, a
message can be very hard to understand.

3. What you did is called a "repair installation," not a "startup
repair." I know that for many people, it's very hard to know what the
right terminology is, but I urge you to work hard to be sure you are
calling something by the correct name. If you don't do so, you run the
substantial risk that your question will not be understood. Worse, it
may be *misunderstood*, and you may therefore get the wrong answer. I
asked what you meant, rather than guessing, but some people will
guess, and some of them will guess wrong.

And one point for you: what you see as 10:44AM on your newsreader will
have a different time for everyone in a different time zone.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup


This is true. I should have said 10:44AM EDST :-)



That would have helped, but no big deal. I should said it was a
*minor* point.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup


  #13 (permalink)  
Old October 14th 09, 11:05 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
Bill Walsh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 63
Default Can a Vista Startup Repair last 5 hours?

Every thing you say is true, but the main question posted has not been
answered by anyone. By the way, Ken, I remember you from the Windows95 days
as one of the best
helpers for those of us who wander away from doing computer things properly.
Nice to see your name again. Bill Walsh
"Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:09:45 -0400, "SC Tom" wrote:


"Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:47:04 -0400, "SC Tom" wrote:


"Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:11:54 +0100, "John Harris"
wrote:

I began a Startup Repair more than five hours ago. Surely this
can't
be
right. If I shut down and try to Restore to an Earlier Point, could
this
make things worse?


What do you mean by a "startup repair"? Exactly what did you do?


--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup

Read his first post at 10:44AM today. Or, better yet, he

"I installed SP1 onto a laptop and after about three quarters of an
hour
into
the process, the laptop switched itself off. I restarted and got a
choice
between Repair or Start Windows normally. "


Thanks, but for John Harris's benefit, let me explain several things:

1. If you start a new thread, rather than reply to an existing one,
it's exceedingly difficult for someone reading the message to
associate the two. Once you ask a question, all follow-up messages
should be by replying to the existing thread, not by posting a new
message.

2. If there was a previous message, and you don't quote any of it,
it's exceedingly difficult to associate the two. Many of us here (me,
for example) don't save already-read messages, and without a quote, a
message can be very hard to understand.

3. What you did is called a "repair installation," not a "startup
repair." I know that for many people, it's very hard to know what the
right terminology is, but I urge you to work hard to be sure you are
calling something by the correct name. If you don't do so, you run the
substantial risk that your question will not be understood. Worse, it
may be *misunderstood*, and you may therefore get the wrong answer. I
asked what you meant, rather than guessing, but some people will
guess, and some of them will guess wrong.

And one point for you: what you see as 10:44AM on your newsreader will
have a different time for everyone in a different time zone.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup


This is true. I should have said 10:44AM EDST :-)



That would have helped, but no big deal. I should said it was a
*minor* point.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup


  #14 (permalink)  
Old October 15th 09, 01:21 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
Ken Blake, MVP
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,309
Default Can a Vista Startup Repair last 5 hours?

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:05:35 -0400, "Bill Walsh"
wrote:

Every thing you say is true, but the main question posted has not been
answered by anyone. By the way, Ken, I remember you from the Windows95 days
as one of the best
helpers for those of us who wander away from doing computer things properly.
Nice to see your name again. Bill Walsh



Same with you Bill, and thanks for the kind words.




"Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:09:45 -0400, "SC Tom" wrote:


"Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:47:04 -0400, "SC Tom" wrote:


"Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:11:54 +0100, "John Harris"
wrote:

I began a Startup Repair more than five hours ago. Surely this
can't
be
right. If I shut down and try to Restore to an Earlier Point, could
this
make things worse?


What do you mean by a "startup repair"? Exactly what did you do?


--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup

Read his first post at 10:44AM today. Or, better yet, he

"I installed SP1 onto a laptop and after about three quarters of an
hour
into
the process, the laptop switched itself off. I restarted and got a
choice
between Repair or Start Windows normally. "


Thanks, but for John Harris's benefit, let me explain several things:

1. If you start a new thread, rather than reply to an existing one,
it's exceedingly difficult for someone reading the message to
associate the two. Once you ask a question, all follow-up messages
should be by replying to the existing thread, not by posting a new
message.

2. If there was a previous message, and you don't quote any of it,
it's exceedingly difficult to associate the two. Many of us here (me,
for example) don't save already-read messages, and without a quote, a
message can be very hard to understand.

3. What you did is called a "repair installation," not a "startup
repair." I know that for many people, it's very hard to know what the
right terminology is, but I urge you to work hard to be sure you are
calling something by the correct name. If you don't do so, you run the
substantial risk that your question will not be understood. Worse, it
may be *misunderstood*, and you may therefore get the wrong answer. I
asked what you meant, rather than guessing, but some people will
guess, and some of them will guess wrong.

And one point for you: what you see as 10:44AM on your newsreader will
have a different time for everyone in a different time zone.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup

This is true. I should have said 10:44AM EDST :-)



That would have helped, but no big deal. I should said it was a
*minor* point.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup


--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup
  #15 (permalink)  
Old October 15th 09, 01:21 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
Ken Blake, MVP
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,309
Default Can a Vista Startup Repair last 5 hours?

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:05:35 -0400, "Bill Walsh"
wrote:

Every thing you say is true, but the main question posted has not been
answered by anyone. By the way, Ken, I remember you from the Windows95 days
as one of the best
helpers for those of us who wander away from doing computer things properly.
Nice to see your name again. Bill Walsh



Same with you Bill, and thanks for the kind words.




"Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:09:45 -0400, "SC Tom" wrote:


"Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:47:04 -0400, "SC Tom" wrote:


"Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:11:54 +0100, "John Harris"
wrote:

I began a Startup Repair more than five hours ago. Surely this
can't
be
right. If I shut down and try to Restore to an Earlier Point, could
this
make things worse?


What do you mean by a "startup repair"? Exactly what did you do?


--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup

Read his first post at 10:44AM today. Or, better yet, he

"I installed SP1 onto a laptop and after about three quarters of an
hour
into
the process, the laptop switched itself off. I restarted and got a
choice
between Repair or Start Windows normally. "


Thanks, but for John Harris's benefit, let me explain several things:

1. If you start a new thread, rather than reply to an existing one,
it's exceedingly difficult for someone reading the message to
associate the two. Once you ask a question, all follow-up messages
should be by replying to the existing thread, not by posting a new
message.

2. If there was a previous message, and you don't quote any of it,
it's exceedingly difficult to associate the two. Many of us here (me,
for example) don't save already-read messages, and without a quote, a
message can be very hard to understand.

3. What you did is called a "repair installation," not a "startup
repair." I know that for many people, it's very hard to know what the
right terminology is, but I urge you to work hard to be sure you are
calling something by the correct name. If you don't do so, you run the
substantial risk that your question will not be understood. Worse, it
may be *misunderstood*, and you may therefore get the wrong answer. I
asked what you meant, rather than guessing, but some people will
guess, and some of them will guess wrong.

And one point for you: what you see as 10:44AM on your newsreader will
have a different time for everyone in a different time zone.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup

This is true. I should have said 10:44AM EDST :-)



That would have helped, but no big deal. I should said it was a
*minor* point.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup


--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright ©2004-2012 Vista Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.