A Windows Vista forum. Vista Banter

Welcome to Vista Banter.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

Go Back   Home » Vista Banter forum » Microsoft Windows Vista » Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance)

RAM



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old April 26th 10, 05:53 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
MS News Server
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default RAM


  #2 (permalink)  
Old April 26th 10, 08:44 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
MS News Server
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default RAM

Not sure how I managed to post a blank one above .....

Anyway, just installed 2 gb RAM from an one Vista machine into another.
Windows experience gives it a score of 2.6 whereas in the other machine it
was rated 3.8. Any ideas on what might cause the difference.

Cheers,
Mike

"MS News Server" wrote in message
...


  #3 (permalink)  
Old April 26th 10, 08:44 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
MS News Server
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default RAM


Not sure how I managed to post a blank one above .....

Anyway, just installed 2 gb RAM from an one Vista machine into another.
Windows experience gives it a score of 2.6 whereas in the other machine it
was rated 3.8. Any ideas on what might cause the difference.

Cheers,
Mike

"MS News Server" wrote in message
...


  #4 (permalink)  
Old April 26th 10, 10:56 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
Drew[_8_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 19
Default RAM

Unless both machines are identical in regards to motherboards and ram
requirements for same then yes that makes perfect sense. A little more info
would be most helpful..

"MS News Server" wrote in message
...
Not sure how I managed to post a blank one above .....

Anyway, just installed 2 gb RAM from an one Vista machine into another.
Windows experience gives it a score of 2.6 whereas in the other machine it
was rated 3.8. Any ideas on what might cause the difference.

Cheers,
Mike

"MS News Server" wrote in message
...


  #5 (permalink)  
Old April 26th 10, 10:56 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
Drew[_8_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 19
Default RAM


Unless both machines are identical in regards to motherboards and ram
requirements for same then yes that makes perfect sense. A little more info
would be most helpful..

"MS News Server" wrote in message
...
Not sure how I managed to post a blank one above .....

Anyway, just installed 2 gb RAM from an one Vista machine into another.
Windows experience gives it a score of 2.6 whereas in the other machine it
was rated 3.8. Any ideas on what might cause the difference.

Cheers,
Mike

"MS News Server" wrote in message
...


  #6 (permalink)  
Old April 27th 10, 09:59 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
Rick Rogers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,428
Default RAM

Timing. If the board doesn't support as high a timing, or has to step down
the timing to match other internals, then it will reduce the performance
score.

--
Best of Luck,

Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
Windows help - www.rickrogers.org

"MS News Server" wrote in message
...
Not sure how I managed to post a blank one above .....

Anyway, just installed 2 gb RAM from an one Vista machine into another.
Windows experience gives it a score of 2.6 whereas in the other machine it
was rated 3.8. Any ideas on what might cause the difference.

Cheers,
Mike

"MS News Server" wrote in message
...



  #7 (permalink)  
Old April 27th 10, 09:59 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
Rick Rogers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,428
Default RAM

Timing. If the board doesn't support as high a timing, or has to step down
the timing to match other internals, then it will reduce the performance
score.

--
Best of Luck,

Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
Windows help - www.rickrogers.org

"MS News Server" wrote in message
...
Not sure how I managed to post a blank one above .....

Anyway, just installed 2 gb RAM from an one Vista machine into another.
Windows experience gives it a score of 2.6 whereas in the other machine it
was rated 3.8. Any ideas on what might cause the difference.

Cheers,
Mike

"MS News Server" wrote in message
...



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright ©2004-2024 Vista Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.