A Windows Vista forum. Vista Banter

Welcome to Vista Banter.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

Go Back   Home » Vista Banter forum » Microsoft Windows Vista » General Vista Help and Support
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

General Vista Help and Support The general Windows Vista discussion forum, for topics not covered elsewhere. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.general)

Memory upgrade causing long processing time



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old August 18th 11, 01:55 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
PaulM[_8_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6
Default Memory upgrade causing long processing time

I guess not.



"Gene E. Bloch" wrote in message
...

On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:05:58 -0400, PaulM wrote:

I am waiting an answer... All he as to do is go back to 2 gb and I bet the
computer runs faster.

"Gene E. Bloch" wrote in message
...

On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:18:48 -0400, PaulM wrote:

If you go back to 2gb, what happpends??? It runs faster right!!!


Fie upon thee for suggesting an actual experiment!

And a clever one, at that.


Yes, an answer would be nice - but I guess not forthcoming :-(

--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)

  #12 (permalink)  
Old August 18th 11, 03:53 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
The Doctor[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 50
Default Memory upgrade causing long processing time

In article ,
Gene E. Bloch wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:05:58 -0400, PaulM wrote:

I am waiting an answer... All he as to do is go back to 2 gb and I bet the
computer runs faster.

"Gene E. Bloch" wrote in message
...

On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:18:48 -0400, PaulM wrote:

If you go back to 2gb, what happpends??? It runs faster right!!!


Fie upon thee for suggesting an actual experiment!

And a clever one, at that.


Yes, an answer would be nice - but I guess not forthcoming :-(

--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)


Finally got over there today and it appears the system is working fine.


--
Member - Liberal International This is Ici
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://twitter.com/rootnl2k http://www.facebook.com/dyadallee
IT is done! http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.drwho/about
  #13 (permalink)  
Old August 18th 11, 04:38 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
Gene E. Bloch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,191
Default Memory upgrade causing long processing time

On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 03:53:44 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:

In article ,
Gene E. Bloch wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:05:58 -0400, PaulM wrote:

I am waiting an answer... All he as to do is go back to 2 gb and I bet the
computer runs faster.

"Gene E. Bloch" wrote in message
...

On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:18:48 -0400, PaulM wrote:

If you go back to 2gb, what happpends??? It runs faster right!!!

Fie upon thee for suggesting an actual experiment!

And a clever one, at that.


Yes, an answer would be nice - but I guess not forthcoming :-(

--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)


Finally got over there today and it appears the system is working fine.


That's good news.

Do you mean you tried the suggested experiment with the reduced memory,
or is it mooted by the fact that it somehow reverted to spontaneously
working fine?

--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)
  #14 (permalink)  
Old August 18th 11, 02:51 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
The Doctor[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 50
Default Memory upgrade causing long processing time

In article ,
Gene E. Bloch wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 03:53:44 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:

In article ,
Gene E. Bloch wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:05:58 -0400, PaulM wrote:

I am waiting an answer... All he as to do is go back to 2 gb and I bet the
computer runs faster.

"Gene E. Bloch" wrote in message
...

On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:18:48 -0400, PaulM wrote:

If you go back to 2gb, what happpends??? It runs faster right!!!

Fie upon thee for suggesting an actual experiment!

And a clever one, at that.

Yes, an answer would be nice - but I guess not forthcoming :-(

--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)


Finally got over there today and it appears the system is working fine.


That's good news.

Do you mean you tried the suggested experiment with the reduced memory,
or is it mooted by the fact that it somehow reverted to spontaneously
working fine?

--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)


The latter.
--
Member - Liberal International This is Ici
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://twitter.com/rootnl2k http://www.facebook.com/dyadallee
IT is done! http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.drwho/about
  #15 (permalink)  
Old August 18th 11, 11:28 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
Gene E. Bloch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,191
Default Memory upgrade causing long processing time

On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:51:28 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:


Finally got over there today and it appears the system is working fine.


That's good news.

Do you mean you tried the suggested experiment with the reduced memory,
or is it mooted by the fact that it somehow reverted to spontaneously
working fine?

--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)


The latter.


Thankee.

--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright ©2004-2024 Vista Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.