![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I'm currently running 1Gb of DDR2 RAM on a home built machine.
Installed Vista and so far no problems. My questions is... if I upgrade and add another 1Gb of RAM, will this require a new install? Seems to me there was an issue with either Win2K or XP that if crossed a certain line (total RAM) it required a reinstall to update the HAL [hardware abstraction layer] any ideas? |
|
|||
|
No, it shouldn't. There are certain other hardware changes (motherboard
change, etc.) that need to take place as well. Dustin Harper http://www.vistarip.com johnm wrote: I'm currently running 1Gb of DDR2 RAM on a home built machine. Installed Vista and so far no problems. My questions is... if I upgrade and add another 1Gb of RAM, will this require a new install? Seems to me there was an issue with either Win2K or XP that if crossed a certain line (total RAM) it required a reinstall to update the HAL [hardware abstraction layer] any ideas? |
|
|||
|
I just did the same thing. No issues on reboot.
"johnm" wrote in message ... I'm currently running 1Gb of DDR2 RAM on a home built machine. Installed Vista and so far no problems. My questions is... if I upgrade and add another 1Gb of RAM, will this require a new install? Seems to me there was an issue with either Win2K or XP that if crossed a certain line (total RAM) it required a reinstall to update the HAL [hardware abstraction layer] any ideas? |
|
|||
|
actually, I remember what the issue was now...
when XP came out, I was running a single Pentium-class processor on a mobo that had two sockets. when I added a 2nd processor, -that's- when I had to reinstall to update the HAL - it wasn't memory after all thanx anyway "Mark Christopherson" wrote in message ... I just did the same thing. No issues on reboot. "johnm" wrote in message ... I'm currently running 1Gb of DDR2 RAM on a home built machine. Installed Vista and so far no problems. My questions is... if I upgrade and add another 1Gb of RAM, will this require a new install? Seems to me there was an issue with either Win2K or XP that if crossed a certain line (total RAM) it required a reinstall to update the HAL [hardware abstraction layer] any ideas? |
|
|||
|
if I upgrade and add another 1Gb of RAM, will this require a new install?
From my own experience - I've done quite a few memory upgrades on Vista systems and never run into a problem like that. -- Regards, Yuriy This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. If you have additional questions, please post them to this newsgroup "johnm" wrote in message ... I'm currently running 1Gb of DDR2 RAM on a home built machine. Installed Vista and so far no problems. My questions is... if I upgrade and add another 1Gb of RAM, will this require a new install? Seems to me there was an issue with either Win2K or XP that if crossed a certain line (total RAM) it required a reinstall to update the HAL [hardware abstraction layer] any ideas? |