![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hey all,
I know that when a process is using a lot of handles, that means it's consuming a lot of resources. So I'm pretty surprised that lsm.exe (Local Session Manager Service) consumes between 15,000 and 30,000 handles on my machine! In XP, I usually have 15,000 handles open on a system with lots of applications open. Why would lsm.exe be using so many handles? Is this possibly a concern? |
|
|||
|
On Feb 25, 2:13 pm, "jminiman" wrote:
Hey all, I know that when a process is using a lot of handles, that means it's consuming a lot of resources. So I'm pretty surprised that lsm.exe (Local Session Manager Service) consumes between 15,000 and 30,000 handles on my machine! In XP, I usually have 15,000 handles open on a system with lots of applications open. Why would lsm.exe be using so many handles? Is this possibly a concern? Does no one have any thoughts on this? |