A Windows Vista forum. Vista Banter

Welcome to Vista Banter.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

Go Back   Home » Vista Banter forum » Microsoft Windows Vista » Printing, Faxing and Scanning with Vista
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Printing, Faxing and Scanning with Vista A forum for using printers, scanners and fx with Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.print_fax_scan)

Lack of FAX Support for Vista Home Premium



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old February 28th 07, 01:42 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.print_fax_scan
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 534
Default Lack of FAX Support for Vista Home Premium

You should read more carefully. It's all there.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"GreenWing" wrote in message
...
I didn't read in the MS Vista website documentation where it said that
existing XP functionality would actually be removed when upgrading to
whatever version of Vista...I read that as I would not be getting
"enhanced" vista faxing...I had no idea the old XP faxing would actually be
removed...

Same applies to the system backup functionality...XP could do full
backups, but Vista Home Premium cannot...

Greenwing

"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message
...
I understand. This one has caught a lot of folks off guard. But the
documentation was all there before you chose your version.




  #12 (permalink)  
Old February 28th 07, 02:04 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.print_fax_scan
Mike Hall - MS MVP Windows Shell/User
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 627
Default Lack of FAX Support for Vista Home Premium

You should expect what the box tells you is contained therein..
"Cyn" wrote in message ...
We read all that. We just expect to GAIN things, not lose them, when we upgrade.

--
Cynthia Dagnal Myron
Faculty
Axia/Western International University
Associate Programs


520-241-0126
Pacific Time


"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message ...
The features included with each version are not a secret. Users need to read
that information very carefully before they decide on which version to
choose. Caveat emptor.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"johnm" wrote in message
...

"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message
...
Multiple posts exist on this subject. Feel free to contibribute if you
have anything to add to those posts. So far, you haven't.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]



as haven't you..... smartass

to the OP, try
http://www.snappysoftware.com/
look for Snappy Fax, works with Vista

funny though, why MS decided to remove a feature from what they KNEW would
be their top seller.
just one more example of how "upgrading" to Vista actually results in a
"downgrade"




--


Mike Hall
MS MVP Windows Shell/User
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/



  #13 (permalink)  
Old February 28th 07, 07:03 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.print_fax_scan
Cyn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 65
Default Lack of FAX Support for Vista Home Premium

You're not hearing those of us who aren't as well versed in this as you are. When we upgrade, we expect to get new things, not lose things that worked perfectly. What was on the box (though I ordered online after doing the whole "readiness" thing), told me what Vista had. It didn't tell me that Vista would disable things already installed. Does this make sense to you? Previously, when I upgraded, features didn't disappear--or didn't seem to. They got better, faster...but were there. Now, I have actually gotten less for my money than I have previously. And that really bothers me.

--
Cynthia Dagnal Myron
Faculty
Axia/Western International University
Associate Programs


520-241-0126
Pacific Time


"Mike Hall - MS MVP Windows Shell/User" wrote in message ...
You should expect what the box tells you is contained therein..
"Cyn" wrote in message ...
We read all that. We just expect to GAIN things, not lose them, when we upgrade.

--
Cynthia Dagnal Myron
Faculty
Axia/Western International University
Associate Programs


520-241-0126
Pacific Time


"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message ...
The features included with each version are not a secret. Users need to read
that information very carefully before they decide on which version to
choose. Caveat emptor.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"johnm" wrote in message
...

"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message
...
Multiple posts exist on this subject. Feel free to contibribute if you
have anything to add to those posts. So far, you haven't.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]



as haven't you..... smartass

to the OP, try
http://www.snappysoftware.com/
look for Snappy Fax, works with Vista

funny though, why MS decided to remove a feature from what they KNEW would
be their top seller.
just one more example of how "upgrading" to Vista actually results in a
"downgrade"




--


Mike Hall
MS MVP Windows Shell/User
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/



  #14 (permalink)  
Old February 28th 07, 07:52 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.print_fax_scan
ripley56
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Lack of FAX Support for Vista Home Premium

I upgraded to vista home premium from xp and found that my fax program had
vanished. So home premium stole my fax program and charged me for the
privilage
I am now in the process of asking microsoft for my money back.

"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote:

You should read more carefully. It's all there.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"GreenWing" wrote in message
...
I didn't read in the MS Vista website documentation where it said that
existing XP functionality would actually be removed when upgrading to
whatever version of Vista...I read that as I would not be getting
"enhanced" vista faxing...I had no idea the old XP faxing would actually be
removed...

Same applies to the system backup functionality...XP could do full
backups, but Vista Home Premium cannot...

Greenwing

"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message
...
I understand. This one has caught a lot of folks off guard. But the
documentation was all there before you chose your version.





  #15 (permalink)  
Old February 28th 07, 08:49 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.print_fax_scan
Mike Hall - MS MVP Windows Shell/User
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 627
Default Lack of FAX Support for Vista Home Premium

This is a free fax service.. I have never used it personally..

http://www.freefax.com/
"Cyn" wrote in message ...
You're not hearing those of us who aren't as well versed in this as you are. When we upgrade, we expect to get new things, not lose things that worked perfectly. What was on the box (though I ordered online after doing the whole "readiness" thing), told me what Vista had. It didn't tell me that Vista would disable things already installed. Does this make sense to you? Previously, when I upgraded, features didn't disappear--or didn't seem to. They got better, faster...but were there. Now, I have actually gotten less for my money than I have previously. And that really bothers me.

--
Cynthia Dagnal Myron
Faculty
Axia/Western International University
Associate Programs


520-241-0126
Pacific Time


"Mike Hall - MS MVP Windows Shell/User" wrote in message ...
You should expect what the box tells you is contained therein..
"Cyn" wrote in message ...
We read all that. We just expect to GAIN things, not lose them, when we upgrade.

--
Cynthia Dagnal Myron
Faculty
Axia/Western International University
Associate Programs


520-241-0126
Pacific Time


"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message ...
The features included with each version are not a secret. Users need to read
that information very carefully before they decide on which version to
choose. Caveat emptor.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"johnm" wrote in message
...

"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message
...
Multiple posts exist on this subject. Feel free to contibribute if you
have anything to add to those posts. So far, you haven't.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]



as haven't you..... smartass

to the OP, try
http://www.snappysoftware.com/
look for Snappy Fax, works with Vista

funny though, why MS decided to remove a feature from what they KNEW would
be their top seller.
just one more example of how "upgrading" to Vista actually results in a
"downgrade"




--


Mike Hall
MS MVP Windows Shell/User
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/




--


Mike Hall
MS MVP Windows Shell/User
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/



  #16 (permalink)  
Old February 28th 07, 09:10 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.print_fax_scan
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 534
Default Lack of FAX Support for Vista Home Premium

I wouldn't say you aren't being heard. There are now numerous posts from
people with the same complaint which have received a number of sympathetic
replies, including a remarkably candid response from a Microsoft employee
who said the feature list for each version was made by the marketing
department at the last minute, not by the developers who would have
preferred the fax module go into all versions.
We have far exceeded the point where reposting the same complaint in a
peer-to-peer group will accomplish anything. The take home message here
remains:
1. Vista is a completely new OS with completely different versions. It is
naive to assume that the version you used in XP is in any way equivalent to
the version you would want in Vista and that every feature your XP version
had would remain in Vista.
2. Research carefully whether you even need to "upgrade" to Vista. If you
decide you do, then research even more carefully which version has the
features you need. You do that when you upgrade your TV or car. Why wouldn't
you do so when you update your OS?

Watching people rush to Vista has been like watching lemmings jump into the
sea. In my world, a new OS from Microsoft belongs on a test partition for at
least 2 years until the applications we use even have a chance to work with
it.

Just curious. What were the reasons you found that were so compelling that
you needed to update to Vista right away?
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Cyn" wrote in message
...
You're not hearing those of us who aren't as well versed in this as you are.
When we upgrade, we expect to get new things, not lose things that worked
perfectly. What was on the box (though I ordered online after doing the
whole "readiness" thing), told me what Vista had. It didn't tell me that
Vista would disable things already installed. Does this make sense to you?
Previously, when I upgraded, features didn't disappear--or didn't seem to.
They got better, faster...but were there. Now, I have actually gotten less
for my money than I have previously. And that really bothers me.

--
Cynthia Dagnal Myron
Faculty
Axia/Western International University
Associate Programs


520-241-0126
Pacific Time


"Mike Hall - MS MVP Windows Shell/User" wrote in message
...
You should expect what the box tells you is contained therein..
"Cyn" wrote in message
...
We read all that. We just expect to GAIN things, not lose them, when we
upgrade.

--
Cynthia Dagnal Myron
Faculty
Axia/Western International University
Associate Programs


520-241-0126
Pacific Time


"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message
...
The features included with each version are not a secret. Users need to read
that information very carefully before they decide on which version to
choose. Caveat emptor.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"johnm" wrote in message
...

"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message
...
Multiple posts exist on this subject. Feel free to contibribute if you
have anything to add to those posts. So far, you haven't.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]



as haven't you..... smartass

to the OP, try
http://www.snappysoftware.com/
look for Snappy Fax, works with Vista

funny though, why MS decided to remove a feature from what they KNEW would
be their top seller.
just one more example of how "upgrading" to Vista actually results in a
"downgrade"




--


Mike Hall
MS MVP Windows Shell/User
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/





  #17 (permalink)  
Old February 28th 07, 10:24 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.print_fax_scan
Dan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17
Default Lack of FAX Support for Vista Home Premium

So basically now your are calling people idiots in your humble opinion for
not only assuming they would not lose anything by upgrading to Vista but
also by upgrading to Vista period.
Mister if you wish to run around using your so called title as a badge you
best learn a little something about marketing.
When people are upset you do not go poking them with a stick.
I still stand by Microsoft but some of the people using MVP need to grow up.


"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message
...
I wouldn't say you aren't being heard. There are now numerous posts from
people with the same complaint which have received a number of sympathetic
replies, including a remarkably candid response from a Microsoft employee
who said the feature list for each version was made by the marketing
department at the last minute, not by the developers who would have
preferred the fax module go into all versions.
We have far exceeded the point where reposting the same complaint in a
peer-to-peer group will accomplish anything. The take home message here
remains:
1. Vista is a completely new OS with completely different versions. It is
naive to assume that the version you used in XP is in any way equivalent
to the version you would want in Vista and that every feature your XP
version had would remain in Vista.
2. Research carefully whether you even need to "upgrade" to Vista. If you
decide you do, then research even more carefully which version has the
features you need. You do that when you upgrade your TV or car. Why
wouldn't you do so when you update your OS?

Watching people rush to Vista has been like watching lemmings jump into
the sea. In my world, a new OS from Microsoft belongs on a test partition
for at least 2 years until the applications we use even have a chance to
work with it.

Just curious. What were the reasons you found that were so compelling that
you needed to update to Vista right away?
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Cyn" wrote in message
...
You're not hearing those of us who aren't as well versed in this as you
are. When we upgrade, we expect to get new things, not lose things that
worked perfectly. What was on the box (though I ordered online after
doing the whole "readiness" thing), told me what Vista had. It didn't
tell me that Vista would disable things already installed. Does this make
sense to you? Previously, when I upgraded, features didn't disappear--or
didn't seem to. They got better, faster...but were there. Now, I have
actually gotten less for my money than I have previously. And that really
bothers me.

--
Cynthia Dagnal Myron
Faculty
Axia/Western International University
Associate Programs


520-241-0126
Pacific Time


"Mike Hall - MS MVP Windows Shell/User" wrote in
message ...
You should expect what the box tells you is contained therein..
"Cyn" wrote in message
...
We read all that. We just expect to GAIN things, not lose them, when we
upgrade.

--
Cynthia Dagnal Myron
Faculty
Axia/Western International University
Associate Programs


520-241-0126
Pacific Time


"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message
...
The features included with each version are not a secret. Users need to
read
that information very carefully before they decide on which version to
choose. Caveat emptor.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"johnm" wrote in message
...

"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message
...
Multiple posts exist on this subject. Feel free to contibribute if you
have anything to add to those posts. So far, you haven't.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]



as haven't you..... smartass

to the OP, try
http://www.snappysoftware.com/
look for Snappy Fax, works with Vista

funny though, why MS decided to remove a feature from what they KNEW
would
be their top seller.
just one more example of how "upgrading" to Vista actually results in a
"downgrade"




--


Mike Hall
MS MVP Windows Shell/User
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/






  #18 (permalink)  
Old February 28th 07, 11:39 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.print_fax_scan
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 534
Default Lack of FAX Support for Vista Home Premium

What an odd and insulting response. You are free to interpret my post
however you wish. I suspect few would interpret it as you did.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Dan" wrote in message
...
So basically now your are calling people idiots in your humble opinion for
not only assuming they would not lose anything by upgrading to Vista but
also by upgrading to Vista period.
Mister if you wish to run around using your so called title as a badge you
best learn a little something about marketing.
When people are upset you do not go poking them with a stick.
I still stand by Microsoft but some of the people using MVP need to grow
up.


"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message
...
I wouldn't say you aren't being heard. There are now numerous posts from
people with the same complaint which have received a number of sympathetic
replies, including a remarkably candid response from a Microsoft employee
who said the feature list for each version was made by the marketing
department at the last minute, not by the developers who would have
preferred the fax module go into all versions.
We have far exceeded the point where reposting the same complaint in a
peer-to-peer group will accomplish anything. The take home message here
remains:
1. Vista is a completely new OS with completely different versions. It is
naive to assume that the version you used in XP is in any way equivalent
to the version you would want in Vista and that every feature your XP
version had would remain in Vista.
2. Research carefully whether you even need to "upgrade" to Vista. If you
decide you do, then research even more carefully which version has the
features you need. You do that when you upgrade your TV or car. Why
wouldn't you do so when you update your OS?

Watching people rush to Vista has been like watching lemmings jump into
the sea. In my world, a new OS from Microsoft belongs on a test partition
for at least 2 years until the applications we use even have a chance to
work with it.

Just curious. What were the reasons you found that were so compelling
that you needed to update to Vista right away?
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Cyn" wrote in message
...
You're not hearing those of us who aren't as well versed in this as you
are. When we upgrade, we expect to get new things, not lose things that
worked perfectly. What was on the box (though I ordered online after
doing the whole "readiness" thing), told me what Vista had. It didn't
tell me that Vista would disable things already installed. Does this
make sense to you? Previously, when I upgraded, features didn't
disappear--or didn't seem to. They got better, faster...but were there.
Now, I have actually gotten less for my money than I have previously.
And that really bothers me.

--
Cynthia Dagnal Myron
Faculty
Axia/Western International University
Associate Programs


520-241-0126
Pacific Time


"Mike Hall - MS MVP Windows Shell/User" wrote in
message ...
You should expect what the box tells you is contained therein..
"Cyn" wrote in message
...
We read all that. We just expect to GAIN things, not lose them, when we
upgrade.

--
Cynthia Dagnal Myron
Faculty
Axia/Western International University
Associate Programs


520-241-0126
Pacific Time


"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message
...
The features included with each version are not a secret. Users need to
read
that information very carefully before they decide on which version to
choose. Caveat emptor.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"johnm" wrote in message
...

"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message
...
Multiple posts exist on this subject. Feel free to contibribute if you
have anything to add to those posts. So far, you haven't.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]


as haven't you..... smartass

to the OP, try
http://www.snappysoftware.com/
look for Snappy Fax, works with Vista

funny though, why MS decided to remove a feature from what they KNEW
would
be their top seller.
just one more example of how "upgrading" to Vista actually results in a
"downgrade"




--


Mike Hall
MS MVP Windows Shell/User
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/







  #19 (permalink)  
Old March 1st 07, 12:40 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.print_fax_scan
ripley56
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Lack of FAX Support for Vista Home Premium

The developers wanted to keep the fax in home premium, so who are you with,
the developers or the marketing people, because the developers are with us,
and let’s face it, without the developers we would still be using
calculators.

"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote:

What an odd and insulting response. You are free to interpret my post
however you wish. I suspect few would interpret it as you did.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Dan" wrote in message
...
So basically now your are calling people idiots in your humble opinion for
not only assuming they would not lose anything by upgrading to Vista but
also by upgrading to Vista period.
Mister if you wish to run around using your so called title as a badge you
best learn a little something about marketing.
When people are upset you do not go poking them with a stick.
I still stand by Microsoft but some of the people using MVP need to grow
up.


"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message
...
I wouldn't say you aren't being heard. There are now numerous posts from
people with the same complaint which have received a number of sympathetic
replies, including a remarkably candid response from a Microsoft employee
who said the feature list for each version was made by the marketing
department at the last minute, not by the developers who would have
preferred the fax module go into all versions.
We have far exceeded the point where reposting the same complaint in a
peer-to-peer group will accomplish anything. The take home message here
remains:
1. Vista is a completely new OS with completely different versions. It is
naive to assume that the version you used in XP is in any way equivalent
to the version you would want in Vista and that every feature your XP
version had would remain in Vista.
2. Research carefully whether you even need to "upgrade" to Vista. If you
decide you do, then research even more carefully which version has the
features you need. You do that when you upgrade your TV or car. Why
wouldn't you do so when you update your OS?

Watching people rush to Vista has been like watching lemmings jump into
the sea. In my world, a new OS from Microsoft belongs on a test partition
for at least 2 years until the applications we use even have a chance to
work with it.

Just curious. What were the reasons you found that were so compelling
that you needed to update to Vista right away?
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Cyn" wrote in message
...
You're not hearing those of us who aren't as well versed in this as you
are. When we upgrade, we expect to get new things, not lose things that
worked perfectly. What was on the box (though I ordered online after
doing the whole "readiness" thing), told me what Vista had. It didn't
tell me that Vista would disable things already installed. Does this
make sense to you? Previously, when I upgraded, features didn't
disappear--or didn't seem to. They got better, faster...but were there.
Now, I have actually gotten less for my money than I have previously.
And that really bothers me.

--
Cynthia Dagnal Myron
Faculty
Axia/Western International University
Associate Programs


520-241-0126
Pacific Time


"Mike Hall - MS MVP Windows Shell/User" wrote in
message ...
You should expect what the box tells you is contained therein..
"Cyn" wrote in message
...
We read all that. We just expect to GAIN things, not lose them, when we
upgrade.

--
Cynthia Dagnal Myron
Faculty
Axia/Western International University
Associate Programs


520-241-0126
Pacific Time


"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message
...
The features included with each version are not a secret. Users need to
read
that information very carefully before they decide on which version to
choose. Caveat emptor.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"johnm" wrote in message
...

"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote in message
...
Multiple posts exist on this subject. Feel free to contibribute if you
have anything to add to those posts. So far, you haven't.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]


as haven't you..... smartass

to the OP, try
http://www.snappysoftware.com/
look for Snappy Fax, works with Vista

funny though, why MS decided to remove a feature from what they KNEW
would
be their top seller.
just one more example of how "upgrading" to Vista actually results in a
"downgrade"




--


Mike Hall
MS MVP Windows Shell/User
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/







  #20 (permalink)  
Old March 1st 07, 12:58 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.print_fax_scan
ripley56
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Lack of FAX Support for Vista Home Premium

suprised are you.

Not half as suprised that Mickeysoft did not think a fax program should be
available to the less well off. if you cannot afford ultimate then tuff you
beggars thats what gates is saying. What an arse

"David A. Lessnau" wrote:

I'm surprised your computer manufacturer didn't include fax software to go
with the fax modem that came with the computer. Have you double-checked
that? Have you checked the manufacturer's web site to see if they have a
program that's compatible with Vista? Failing that, one source of
alternatives might be the Marketplace on the Microsoft Office site:

http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/ma...=fax&av=PMP000

It looks like it contains links for both fax software and internet faxing
sites. I've used both www.efax.com and www.fax1.com .




"jacuze" wrote in message
...
I find it dishearting that Microsoft failed to provide home users with the
ability to send/receive a fax. A fax capability has been a standard
feature
in just about every Microsoft OS I can remember. As a home users, I don't
need a fax on a daily basis. I might use it once a month or once every
couple of months, but when I need it, I expect it to be there.
Microsoft, you failed as far as I am concerned. I purchased a new
computer
with Vista Premium loaded. The computer came with a fax modem, however, I
discoverd that only Business and above have fax capability built in. To
make
it right, Microsoft should include the fax capability as an update or as a
free stand alone download.

----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow
this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.

http://windowshelp.microsoft.com/com...i nt_fax_scan


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright ©2004-2024 Vista Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.