![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I have noticed the same thing=photo downloads from my card seem a lot slower
even with 2 mgs of ram and a duo core it's slower than my XP machines. "Phil" wrote: I have noticed that the download speeds are less than a quarter of what I was getting with XP. Whats up ? |
|
|||
|
Me too - I have 2gb memory and an X2 4200 dual-core !
Maybe it's a fatal combination blind spot for Vista !!! "Gary" Gary @discussions.microsoft.com wrote in message ... I have noticed the same thing=photo downloads from my card seem a lot slower even with 2 mgs of ram and a duo core it's slower than my XP machines. "Phil" wrote: I have noticed that the download speeds are less than a quarter of what I was getting with XP. Whats up ? |