A Windows Vista forum. Vista Banter

Welcome to Vista Banter.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

Go Back   Home » Vista Banter forum » Microsoft Windows Vista » Networking with Windows Vista
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Networking with Windows Vista Networking issues and questions with Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing)

DNS Search Order Question



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old March 23rd 07, 07:14 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing
Paul Wain
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default DNS Search Order Question

Seeing a weirdness in Vista networking relating to DNS search order...

Our DHCP gives out:

corp.company.com
internal.company.com
company.com
dev.company.com
test.company.com

On XP, attempting to resolve the host "xrn.stage" which has a FQHN of
"xrn.shage.company.com" works correctly and IE7 ends up in the right place

On Vista (Ultimate and Enterprise) the same setup fails with an unknown
hostname both in IE7 and via nslookup in the command prompt

Any thoughts/suggestions? We dont want stage.company.com to be a publish
domain for a number of reasons mostly related to it being an exact copy of a
production setup.

Thanks.

  #2 (permalink)  
Old March 24th 07, 01:44 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing
Joe Guidera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 265
Default DNS Search Order Question

I assume that if you use xrn.stage.corp.company.com it resolves correctly?
Technically I think the stack in Vista is operating correctly. When you
attempt to lookup xrn.stage you are technically providing a domain. While
all hosts are domains, not all domains are hosts and that appears to be what
you're running into. I do agree that this may be different behavior than XP
or prior versions of the stack.

If your DNS servers handle the zone "stage" you'd be fine as well since
xrn.stage would resolve correctly as host "xrn" in domain "stage".

The way many companies handle this sort of thing is using different domains
(and corresponding DNS servers) internally than they do externally so they
aren't publishing internal hosts externally. So you might use company.com
externally and company.net (for example) internally.

Not sure if the RFC specifies how your situation is supposed to be handled,
but I suspect that domain completion (e.g. suffix search order) is
implementor specific.

Joe

"Paul Wain" wrote in message
...
Seeing a weirdness in Vista networking relating to DNS search order...

Our DHCP gives out:

corp.company.com
internal.company.com
company.com
dev.company.com
test.company.com

On XP, attempting to resolve the host "xrn.stage" which has a FQHN of
"xrn.shage.company.com" works correctly and IE7 ends up in the right place

On Vista (Ultimate and Enterprise) the same setup fails with an unknown
hostname both in IE7 and via nslookup in the command prompt

Any thoughts/suggestions? We dont want stage.company.com to be a publish
domain for a number of reasons mostly related to it being an exact copy of
a production setup.

Thanks.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright ©2004-2012 Vista Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.