Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
Hardware and Windows Vista Hardware issues in relation to Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.hardware_devices) |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
Vista Memory Diagnostics failing at 21%
I have 4 1gB sticks of Kingston memory in a Gigabyte GA-965p-ds3 ver 3.3,
with bios at ver F10, running at normal speeds. Due to a concern about faulty data after doing an Easy Transfer from another system, I ran Vista Memory Diagnostics in "Extended" mode (Standard mode tests ok). It fails at 21% whether I run it on all four modules, remove two of the modules, replace them with the other two modules, or run just one module. Memtest86 runs ok. Any ideas? I have even changed the BIOS settings to run the memory at 533mhz (it is 667mhz memory). Is there a way to view the MemDiag.bin file that is created in the \Windows\system32\logfiles folder? All I get from Memory Diagnostics is a message that my memory failed the test and I should go to my supplier! |
|
|||
Vista Memory Diagnostics failing at 21%
In message Kim
wrote: I have 4 1gB sticks of Kingston memory in a Gigabyte GA-965p-ds3 ver 3.3, with bios at ver F10, running at normal speeds. Due to a concern about faulty data after doing an Easy Transfer from another system, I ran Vista Memory Diagnostics in "Extended" mode (Standard mode tests ok). It fails at 21% whether I run it on all four modules, remove two of the modules, replace them with the other two modules, or run just one module. Memtest86 runs ok. Any ideas? I have even changed the BIOS settings to run the memory at 533mhz (it is 667mhz memory). Is there a way to view the MemDiag.bin file that is created in the \Windows\system32\logfiles folder? All I get from Memory Diagnostics is a message that my memory failed the test and I should go to my supplier! Try memtest86+ instead, it gives a lot more details about what and where the failure occurred. Have you tried placing in only a single stick, but in each of the different slots? Failing at 21% is odd, that should change when the total amount of memory is reduced. -- Insert something clever here. |
|
|||
Vista Memory Diagnostics failing at 21%
"DevilsPGD" wrote: In message Kim wrote: I have 4 1gB sticks of Kingston memory in a Gigabyte GA-965p-ds3 ver 3.3, with bios at ver F10, running at normal speeds. Due to a concern about faulty data after doing an Easy Transfer from another system, I ran Vista Memory Diagnostics in "Extended" mode (Standard mode tests ok). It fails at 21% whether I run it on all four modules, remove two of the modules, replace them with the other two modules, or run just one module. Memtest86 runs ok. Any ideas? I have even changed the BIOS settings to run the memory at 533mhz (it is 667mhz memory). Is there a way to view the MemDiag.bin file that is created in the \Windows\system32\logfiles folder? All I get from Memory Diagnostics is a message that my memory failed the test and I should go to my supplier! Try memtest86+ instead, it gives a lot more details about what and where the failure occurred. Have you tried placing in only a single stick, but in each of the different slots? Failing at 21% is odd, that should change when the total amount of memory is reduced. -- I know, very odd. I have tried using various combinations, but not putting a single stick in different slots. I am not sure it is always failing, here is some more info: First, I tried running the Diagnostics on the older computer that I am upgrading from. Pentium 4, 2.53ghz, 1GB memory. It goes through the whole test fine. Second, I have been stopping the test when it gets to 21% because it sits there for a long time (greater than 1/2 hr even with just 1GB in), whereas the old system ran through each % pretty much proportionately. However, if I let it go on, it does not fail - sometimes. Not very comforting. Three, I emailed Kingston (the memory is their valueram) and they said to RMA it, Four, I have run Memtest86 on it and it passed, but I have not let it run overnight. Five, I am returning the memory to Newegg and instead of replacing it with the same memory I decided to go to a higher performance memory. Do you know how to interpret the memdiag.bin that is created by WMD? I will probably run Memtest86 overnight just out of curiousity, before I send it back. Thanks for your help. |
|
|||
Vista Memory Diagnostics failing at 21%
"Kim" wrote
I have 4 1gB sticks of Kingston memory in a Gigabyte GA-965p-ds3 ver 3.3, with bios at ver F10, running at normal speeds. Due to a concern about faulty data after doing an Easy Transfer from another system, I ran Vista Memory Diagnostics in "Extended" mode (Standard mode tests ok). It fails at 21% whether I run it on all four modules, remove two of the modules, replace them with the other two modules, or run just one module. Memtest86 runs ok. Any ideas? I have even changed the BIOS settings to run the memory at 533mhz (it is 667mhz memory). Is there a way to view the MemDiag.bin file that is created in the \Windows\system32\logfiles folder? All I get from Memory Diagnostics is a message that my memory failed the test and I should go to my supplier! You've multiposted this to several newsgroups. In the future if you feel it necessary to post to more than one newsgroup do it by crossposting, sending one message at the same time time all groups. Multiposting which is sending separate messages to each group, is counterproductive, leads to duplication and folks in one group don't see the replies made in the other groups. -- Rock [MS-MVP User/Shell] |
|
|||
Vista Memory Diagnostics failing at 21%
Sorry, Rock. I wasn't sure which group the orginal message should go in.
I'll just proceed in this group and not do it again. "Rock" wrote in message ... "Kim" wrote I have 4 1gB sticks of Kingston memory in a Gigabyte GA-965p-ds3 ver 3.3, with bios at ver F10, running at normal speeds. Due to a concern about faulty data after doing an Easy Transfer from another system, I ran Vista Memory Diagnostics in "Extended" mode (Standard mode tests ok). It fails at 21% whether I run it on all four modules, remove two of the modules, replace them with the other two modules, or run just one module. Memtest86 runs ok. Any ideas? I have even changed the BIOS settings to run the memory at 533mhz (it is 667mhz memory). Is there a way to view the MemDiag.bin file that is created in the \Windows\system32\logfiles folder? All I get from Memory Diagnostics is a message that my memory failed the test and I should go to my supplier! You've multiposted this to several newsgroups. In the future if you feel it necessary to post to more than one newsgroup do it by crossposting, sending one message at the same time time all groups. Multiposting which is sending separate messages to each group, is counterproductive, leads to duplication and folks in one group don't see the replies made in the other groups. -- Rock [MS-MVP User/Shell] |
|
|||
Vista Memory Diagnostics failing at 21%
In message Kim
wrote: I know, very odd. I have tried using various combinations, but not putting a single stick in different slots. The theory being "Test the slot" (as well as testing the RAM, and the motherboard's ability to handle different configurations) I am not sure it is always failing, here is some more info: First, I tried running the Diagnostics on the older computer that I am upgrading from. Pentium 4, 2.53ghz, 1GB memory. It goes through the whole test fine. Second, I have been stopping the test when it gets to 21% because it sits there for a long time (greater than 1/2 hr even with just 1GB in), whereas the old system ran through each % pretty much proportionately. However, if I let it go on, it does not fail - sometimes. Not very comforting. Yeah. Unreliable hardware is the worst to try and track down I've got some RAM here that is temperamental in one of my systems, but works fine in others, but it usually passes diagnostic tests, but often fails out a Windows install half way through. Grr. Three, I emailed Kingston (the memory is their valueram) and they said to RMA it, Kingston is pretty good that way. Four, I have run Memtest86 on it and it passed, but I have not let it run overnight. That's usually good news... Five, I am returning the memory to Newegg and instead of replacing it with the same memory I decided to go to a higher performance memory. Sounds reasonable -- Start off leaving your system's configuration as-is and see if it works before you start tweaking for performance, if the problem happens again when you're under-specing the RAM, chances are it's the motherboard (or CPU, if your CPU has an onboard memory controller -- I don't believe the P4 chip does, but many newer processor lines have a memory controller on-chip...) Do you know how to interpret the memdiag.bin that is created by WMD? That one, I do not... I will probably run Memtest86 overnight just out of curiousity, before I send it back. Certainly can't hurt -- I've yet to see an error that doesn't crop up on the first full pass, but I still put all new motherboards/RAM through at least 24 hours of memtest86+ just in case... -- Insert something clever here. |
|
|||
Vista Memory Diagnostics failing at 21%
In message "mikeyhsd"
wrote: more tolerance should be given with the prime purpose being to HELP PEOPLE and not shame them or tell them where to go. Indeed. In fact, look how you've attempted to help. Oh wait, you didn't. Your post was just as useless. There is a practical reason to crosspost rather then multipost. There is a limited amount of time and brainpower available to help posters. Anything which a poster does that reduces that pool of brainpower decreases the overall amount of "help" available. By crossposting instead of multiposting, everyone can see the same post, avoid typing replies which are duplicates / offering duplicate suggestions, and instead spend that time helping someone else or making different suggestions rather then everyone retying the same first-step suggestions. *shrugs* Only you can choose your participation level. You can help people, you can spend your time whining, OR you can whine about the whining about whining, your call. -- Insert something clever here. |
|
|||
Vista Memory Diagnostics failing at 21%
"DevilsPGD" wrote
In message "mikeyhsd" wrote: more tolerance should be given with the prime purpose being to HELP PEOPLE and not shame them or tell them where to go. Indeed. In fact, look how you've attempted to help. Oh wait, you didn't. Your post was just as useless. There is a practical reason to crosspost rather then multipost. There is a limited amount of time and brainpower available to help posters. Anything which a poster does that reduces that pool of brainpower decreases the overall amount of "help" available. By crossposting instead of multiposting, everyone can see the same post, avoid typing replies which are duplicates / offering duplicate suggestions, and instead spend that time helping someone else or making different suggestions rather then everyone retying the same first-step suggestions. *shrugs* Only you can choose your participation level. You can help people, you can spend your time whining, OR you can whine about the whining about whining, your call. -- Insert something clever here. Lol you just have to laugh at mickeyhsd. I replied to Kim in their thread on the other newsgroup with several suggestions. They are aware of the issue and will continue in this thread. This as opposed to mikeyhsd, a quite pathetic character, who is generally of no help. -- Rock [MS-MVP User/Shell] |
|
|||
Vista Memory Diagnostics failing at 21%
for sure I do not have a holier than thou attitude where I spend my time reading news messages and refuse to try and help those that do not meet my perceptions of grammar, punctuation, proper english or correct news group.
intentionally denying someone a answer for a problem because of this is WRONG. you need to re-read the mvp code of conduct especially where it talks about being courteous. "Rock" wrote in message ... "DevilsPGD" wrote In message "mikeyhsd" wrote: more tolerance should be given with the prime purpose being to HELP PEOPLE and not shame them or tell them where to go. Indeed. In fact, look how you've attempted to help. Oh wait, you didn't. Your post was just as useless. There is a practical reason to crosspost rather then multipost. There is a limited amount of time and brainpower available to help posters. Anything which a poster does that reduces that pool of brainpower decreases the overall amount of "help" available. By crossposting instead of multiposting, everyone can see the same post, avoid typing replies which are duplicates / offering duplicate suggestions, and instead spend that time helping someone else or making different suggestions rather then everyone retying the same first-step suggestions. *shrugs* Only you can choose your participation level. You can help people, you can spend your time whining, OR you can whine about the whining about whining, your call. -- Insert something clever here. Lol you just have to laugh at mickeyhsd. I replied to Kim in their thread on the other newsgroup with several suggestions. They are aware of the issue and will continue in this thread. This as opposed to mikeyhsd, a quite pathetic character, who is generally of no help. -- Rock [MS-MVP User/Shell] |