![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Networking with Windows Vista Networking issues and questions with Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Is Vista a step backwards? I don't need all of these UAC controls. For many
years now I have gotten along just fine with few hindrances to efficiency. Now Vista comes along and I can't get hardly anything done because of this over-controlling UAC concept and other ridiculous permission junk. If I want to uninstall or delete something, I don't want the system telling me no! I am capable of fixing any mistakes I might make. When I installed XP for the first time, it was a learning experience, and I had to seek out some new device drivers, but right out of the box I was able to do good solid computer tasks. Not so with Vista. UAC and other Vista schemes really, really get in the way. Microsoft should leave it up to the computer user to set up his/her own protection, There are plenty of great anti-virus and anti-spyware programs out there, and some of the good ones are free. So why is UAC needed? It's a wonder that Microsoft didn't build Norton into Vista! |
|
|||
|
Hi there. I understand your frustration. It is possible to turn UAC off, but
I can't recommend that, of course. (Hint: check User Accounts in Control Panel.) 'Nuff said. Thanks, Gloria -- Gloria Boyer Windows User Assistance Microsoft Corporation "Retired" wrote in message ... Is Vista a step backwards? I don't need all of these UAC controls. For many years now I have gotten along just fine with few hindrances to efficiency. Now Vista comes along and I can't get hardly anything done because of this over-controlling UAC concept and other ridiculous permission junk. If I want to uninstall or delete something, I don't want the system telling me no! I am capable of fixing any mistakes I might make. When I installed XP for the first time, it was a learning experience, and I had to seek out some new device drivers, but right out of the box I was able to do good solid computer tasks. Not so with Vista. UAC and other Vista schemes really, really get in the way. Microsoft should leave it up to the computer user to set up his/her own protection, There are plenty of great anti-virus and anti-spyware programs out there, and some of the good ones are free. So why is UAC needed? It's a wonder that Microsoft didn't build Norton into Vista! |
|
|||
|
Thank you, Gloria. I've done that, thus eliminating a whole host of
interfering "advice". I found out how to turn off UAC by using the HELP feature. Unfortunately there are still too many warning messages interfering with my work. I suppose I'll eventually discover how to block them as well. Security protection features in Vista may help the complete "newbie" user, but for those of us who have bothered to learn how to protect ourselves (AV programs, etc.), the Vista schemes just get in the way. Regards. "Gloria Boyer [MSFT]" wrote in message ... Hi there. I understand your frustration. It is possible to turn UAC off, but I can't recommend that, of course. (Hint: check User Accounts in Control Panel.) 'Nuff said. Thanks, Gloria -- Gloria Boyer Windows User Assistance Microsoft Corporation "Retired" wrote in message ... Is Vista a step backwards? I don't need all of these UAC controls. For many years now I have gotten along just fine with few hindrances to efficiency. Now Vista comes along and I can't get hardly anything done because of this over-controlling UAC concept and other ridiculous permission junk. If I want to uninstall or delete something, I don't want the system telling me no! I am capable of fixing any mistakes I might make. When I installed XP for the first time, it was a learning experience, and I had to seek out some new device drivers, but right out of the box I was able to do good solid computer tasks. Not so with Vista. UAC and other Vista schemes really, really get in the way. Microsoft should leave it up to the computer user to set up his/her own protection, There are plenty of great anti-virus and anti-spyware programs out there, and some of the good ones are free. So why is UAC needed? It's a wonder that Microsoft didn't build Norton into Vista! |
|
|||
|
"Retired" wrote in message ... Thank you, Gloria. I've done that, thus eliminating a whole host of interfering "advice". I found out how to turn off UAC by using the HELP feature. Unfortunately there are still too many warning messages interfering with my work. I suppose I'll eventually discover how to block them as well. Security protection features in Vista may help the complete "newbie" user, but for those of us who have bothered to learn how to protect ourselves (AV programs, etc.), the Vista schemes just get in the way. Regards. "Gloria Boyer [MSFT]" wrote in message ... Hi there. I understand your frustration. It is possible to turn UAC off, but I can't recommend that, of course. (Hint: check User Accounts in Control Panel.) 'Nuff said. Thanks, Gloria -- Gloria Boyer Windows User Assistance Microsoft Corporation "Retired" wrote in message ... Is Vista a step backwards? I don't need all of these UAC controls. For many years now I have gotten along just fine with few hindrances to efficiency. Now Vista comes along and I can't get hardly anything done because of this over-controlling UAC concept and other ridiculous permission junk. If I want to uninstall or delete something, I don't want the system telling me no! I am capable of fixing any mistakes I might make. When I installed XP for the first time, it was a learning experience, and I had to seek out some new device drivers, but right out of the box I was able to do good solid computer tasks. Not so with Vista. UAC and other Vista schemes really, really get in the way. Microsoft should leave it up to the computer user to set up his/her own protection, There are plenty of great anti-virus and anti-spyware programs out there, and some of the good ones are free. So why is UAC needed? It's a wonder that Microsoft didn't build Norton into Vista! Out of interest, what is it that gets in your way now ? I have put UAC back on after a couple of months while I installed things , tweaked and generally got things the way I wanted and I barely notice it. Am I missing some 'useful' advice or admonishments from Microsoft or do you just do more adventurous things than me I wonder. I guess I would like to set my own pace regarding updates, I get the MS e-mail advisories and bulletins and was happy with a monthly routine under XP, but other than that I'm not being chivvied too much. Regards, Tom (also retired) |
|
|||
|
The different features that can protect a computer may get in the way
of an experienced user, but that is not really an issue. What is an issue is a secure computer set up so someone with little or no experience can be safer. The same kinds of things experienced users complain about are the same things Microsoft was blasted for in the past. Another example was the firewall which was initially disabled when Windows XP first shipped. Simply having the firewall enabled would have prevented Blaster of a few years ago. An experienced user can far more easily modify/disable a setting while a new user may not know or even understand such protection is available or even needed. -- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar http://www.dts-l.org "Retired" wrote in message ... Thank you, Gloria. I've done that, thus eliminating a whole host of interfering "advice". I found out how to turn off UAC by using the HELP feature. Unfortunately there are still too many warning messages interfering with my work. I suppose I'll eventually discover how to block them as well. Security protection features in Vista may help the complete "newbie" user, but for those of us who have bothered to learn how to protect ourselves (AV programs, etc.), the Vista schemes just get in the way. Regards. "Gloria Boyer [MSFT]" wrote in message ... Hi there. I understand your frustration. It is possible to turn UAC off, but I can't recommend that, of course. (Hint: check User Accounts in Control Panel.) 'Nuff said. Thanks, Gloria -- Gloria Boyer Windows User Assistance Microsoft Corporation "Retired" wrote in message ... Is Vista a step backwards? I don't need all of these UAC controls. For many years now I have gotten along just fine with few hindrances to efficiency. Now Vista comes along and I can't get hardly anything done because of this over-controlling UAC concept and other ridiculous permission junk. If I want to uninstall or delete something, I don't want the system telling me no! I am capable of fixing any mistakes I might make. When I installed XP for the first time, it was a learning experience, and I had to seek out some new device drivers, but right out of the box I was able to do good solid computer tasks. Not so with Vista. UAC and other Vista schemes really, really get in the way. Microsoft should leave it up to the computer user to set up his/her own protection, There are plenty of great anti-virus and anti-spyware programs out there, and some of the good ones are free. So why is UAC needed? It's a wonder that Microsoft didn't build Norton into Vista! |
|
|||
|
You brought up some very valid points. However, if I were an inexperienced
user, the security functions in Vista would have me soon throwing up my hands in despair because of all of the interruptions. As it is, I know how to avoid them. Guess there just can't be a perfect world. "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" wrote in message ... The different features that can protect a computer may get in the way of an experienced user, but that is not really an issue. What is an issue is a secure computer set up so someone with little or no experience can be safer. The same kinds of things experienced users complain about are the same things Microsoft was blasted for in the past. Another example was the firewall which was initially disabled when Windows XP first shipped. Simply having the firewall enabled would have prevented Blaster of a few years ago. An experienced user can far more easily modify/disable a setting while a new user may not know or even understand such protection is available or even needed. -- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar http://www.dts-l.org "Retired" wrote in message ... Thank you, Gloria. I've done that, thus eliminating a whole host of interfering "advice". I found out how to turn off UAC by using the HELP feature. Unfortunately there are still too many warning messages interfering with my work. I suppose I'll eventually discover how to block them as well. Security protection features in Vista may help the complete "newbie" user, but for those of us who have bothered to learn how to protect ourselves (AV programs, etc.), the Vista schemes just get in the way. Regards. "Gloria Boyer [MSFT]" wrote in message ... Hi there. I understand your frustration. It is possible to turn UAC off, but I can't recommend that, of course. (Hint: check User Accounts in Control Panel.) 'Nuff said. Thanks, Gloria -- Gloria Boyer Windows User Assistance Microsoft Corporation "Retired" wrote in message ... Is Vista a step backwards? I don't need all of these UAC controls. For many years now I have gotten along just fine with few hindrances to efficiency. Now Vista comes along and I can't get hardly anything done because of this over-controlling UAC concept and other ridiculous permission junk. If I want to uninstall or delete something, I don't want the system telling me no! I am capable of fixing any mistakes I might make. When I installed XP for the first time, it was a learning experience, and I had to seek out some new device drivers, but right out of the box I was able to do good solid computer tasks. Not so with Vista. UAC and other Vista schemes really, really get in the way. Microsoft should leave it up to the computer user to set up his/her own protection, There are plenty of great anti-virus and anti-spyware programs out there, and some of the good ones are free. So why is UAC needed? It's a wonder that Microsoft didn't build Norton into Vista! |