![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Networking with Windows Vista Networking issues and questions with Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I have a small network in my office. It connects to the internet via a
Linksys BEFSR411 router (with a cable modem on the WAN port). Given the faster speeds of Gigabit for transfering files, I have a neatgear Gigabit switch connected to the uplink port on the Linksys router and have 3 machines connected to the Gigabit switch. All is well with the network and internet connections. I wish to add a machine that will contain digital images, mp3s and videos. This machine will act as a server only and will use XP as its OS. It will have a video card for set up and a Gigabit NIC. I do not wish to allow this machine to be accessed from or have access to the internet. What is the best way to set this up? I thought I would just add an additional NIC in the machines I will allow to have access to this new 'server', but googling tells me that this can be problematic (and I have yet to come across a success story). I know I could filter internet access from the server by filtering, but that's not the real issue. I really need to prevent access *from* the internet to this machine, which will have read only shares. I doubt that I'll really have any trouble, given that I am behind the router's firewall, but would like to take every precaution, since I will be 'serving' copyrighted content, and also to protect my network. Any ideas on how I would best accomplish this? I've cross-posted to relevant NGs because my last post regarding this issue went unanswered after a few weeks. Thanks, mxh |
|
|||
|
mxh wrote:
I have a small network in my office. It connects to the internet via a Linksys BEFSR411 router (with a cable modem on the WAN port). Given the faster speeds of Gigabit for transfering files, I have a neatgear Gigabit switch connected to the uplink port on the Linksys router and have 3 machines connected to the Gigabit switch. All is well with the network and internet connections. I wish to add a machine that will contain digital images, mp3s and videos. This machine will act as a server only and will use XP as its OS. It will have a video card for set up and a Gigabit NIC. I do not wish to allow this machine to be accessed from or have access to the internet. What is the best way to set this up? I thought I would just add an additional NIC in the machines I will allow to have access to this new 'server', but googling tells me that this can be problematic (and I have yet to come across a success story). I know I could filter internet access from the server by filtering, but that's not the real issue. I really need to prevent access *from* the internet to this machine, which will have read only shares. I doubt that I'll really have any trouble, given that I am behind the router's firewall, but would like to take every precaution, since I will be 'serving' copyrighted content, and also to protect my network. Any ideas on how I would best accomplish this? Two ideas come to mind, both of which I am currently using in our office. The first is to assign the server a fixed IP address and restrict that address in the router. The second is to put the server on a separate subnet. I've cross-posted to relevant NGs because my last post regarding this issue went unanswered after a few weeks. Thanks, mxh |
|
|||
|
"Michael W. Ryder" wrote in message ... mxh wrote: snip I wish to add a machine... snip I do not wish to allow this machine to be accessed from or have access to the internet. What is the best way to set this up? I thought I would just add an additional NIC in the machines I will allow to have access to this new 'server', but googling tells me that this can be problematic (and I have yet to come across a success story). I know I could filter internet access from the server by filtering, but that's not the real issue. I really need to prevent access *from* the internet to this machine, which will have read only shares. snip Any ideas on how I would best accomplish this? Two ideas come to mind, both of which I am currently using in our office. The first is to assign the server a fixed IP address and restrict that address in the router. The second is to put the server on a separate subnet. Hi Michael, Thanks for the response. By restricting the address in the router, I assume you mean filtering that address in the router security tab so that it cannot access the internet. Is that correct? Also, I'm not quite sure how I would set up a separate subnet. Could I impose on you for a brief explanation or a link? Thanks again, mxh |
|
|||
|
mxh wrote:
"Michael W. Ryder" wrote in message ... mxh wrote: snip I wish to add a machine... snip I do not wish to allow this machine to be accessed from or have access to the internet. What is the best way to set this up? I thought I would just add an additional NIC in the machines I will allow to have access to this new 'server', but googling tells me that this can be problematic (and I have yet to come across a success story). I know I could filter internet access from the server by filtering, but that's not the real issue. I really need to prevent access *from* the internet to this machine, which will have read only shares. snip Any ideas on how I would best accomplish this? Two ideas come to mind, both of which I am currently using in our office. The first is to assign the server a fixed IP address and restrict that address in the router. The second is to put the server on a separate subnet. Hi Michael, Thanks for the response. By restricting the address in the router, I assume you mean filtering that address in the router security tab so that it cannot access the internet. Is that correct? Yes. Also, I'm not quite sure how I would set up a separate subnet. Could I impose on you for a brief explanation or a link? You would assign it a fixed address on a different subnet than the router. If the router was 192.196.0.1, for example, you could set the server up as 192.196.1.1. You would then have to give the machines you want access to that computer an entry in the gateway entry for those computers. I think the first option is probably better for your circumstances. I used the second option for one server because of software requirements. Thanks again, mxh |
|
|||
|
"Michael W. Ryder" wrote in message ... mxh wrote: "Michael W. Ryder" wrote in message ... mxh wrote: snip I wish to add a machine... snip I do not wish to allow this machine to be accessed from or have access to the internet. What is the best way to set this up? I thought I would just add an additional NIC in the machines I will allow to have access to this new 'server', but googling tells me that this can be problematic (and I have yet to come across a success story). I know I could filter internet access from the server by filtering, but that's not the real issue. I really need to prevent access *from* the internet to this machine, which will have read only shares. snip Any ideas on how I would best accomplish this? Two ideas come to mind, both of which I am currently using in our office. The first is to assign the server a fixed IP address and restrict that address in the router. The second is to put the server on a separate subnet. Hi Michael, Thanks for the response. By restricting the address in the router, I assume you mean filtering that address in the router security tab so that it cannot access the internet. Is that correct? Yes. Also, I'm not quite sure how I would set up a separate subnet. Could I impose on you for a brief explanation or a link? You would assign it a fixed address on a different subnet than the router. If the router was 192.196.0.1, for example, you could set the server up as 192.196.1.1. You would then have to give the machines you want access to that computer an entry in the gateway entry for those computers. So, to be sure I understand, the 'server' (XP) would get (to use your example) an IP address of 192.196.1.1 in the TCP/IP properties of the server (disabling 'obtain address automatically'...would I need to disable DHCP?) and for each machines that I wish to allow access, place that same address (192.196.1.1) in the default gateways section of the Advanced TCP/IP properties (Vista) of each 'access desired' machine? I think the first option is probably better for your circumstances. I used the second option for one server because of software requirements. OK, I'm with you so far, and I prefer to keep it as simple as possible, but a question: I thought that the filter on the security tab of the router only prevented the machine from accessing the internet. Does it also provide security from those who might try to access it from outside my network (i.e., bad guys)? Thanks again for your time and patience, mxh |
|
|||
|
mxh wrote:
"Michael W. Ryder" wrote in message ... mxh wrote: "Michael W. Ryder" wrote in message ... mxh wrote: snip I wish to add a machine... snip I do not wish to allow this machine to be accessed from or have access to the internet. What is the best way to set this up? I thought I would just add an additional NIC in the machines I will allow to have access to this new 'server', but googling tells me that this can be problematic (and I have yet to come across a success story). I know I could filter internet access from the server by filtering, but that's not the real issue. I really need to prevent access *from* the internet to this machine, which will have read only shares. snip Any ideas on how I would best accomplish this? Two ideas come to mind, both of which I am currently using in our office. The first is to assign the server a fixed IP address and restrict that address in the router. The second is to put the server on a separate subnet. Hi Michael, Thanks for the response. By restricting the address in the router, I assume you mean filtering that address in the router security tab so that it cannot access the internet. Is that correct? Yes. Also, I'm not quite sure how I would set up a separate subnet. Could I impose on you for a brief explanation or a link? You would assign it a fixed address on a different subnet than the router. If the router was 192.196.0.1, for example, you could set the server up as 192.196.1.1. You would then have to give the machines you want access to that computer an entry in the gateway entry for those computers. So, to be sure I understand, the 'server' (XP) would get (to use your example) an IP address of 192.196.1.1 in the TCP/IP properties of the server (disabling 'obtain address automatically'...would I need to disable DHCP?) and for each machines that I wish to allow access, place that same address (192.196.1.1) in the default gateways section of the Advanced TCP/IP properties (Vista) of each 'access desired' machine? I think the first option is probably better for your circumstances. I used the second option for one server because of software requirements. OK, I'm with you so far, and I prefer to keep it as simple as possible, but a question: I thought that the filter on the security tab of the router only prevented the machine from accessing the internet. Does it also provide security from those who might try to access it from outside my network (i.e., bad guys)? Thanks again for your time and patience, mxh After looking at the manual for the router, we used to use one of those, it appears that the default address for the router is 192.168.1.1 and it uses 100 to 150 for automatically assigning addresses. For the first option setting the servers address to say 192.168.1.99 and entering that address in the filtering should stop all traffic between the server and the Internet. For the second option where the server is on a second subnet you will probably just need to change the subnet mask from 255.255.255.0 to 255.255.0.0. This should allow the computer to talk to each other. |
|
|||
|
You could also implement a basic IPsec policy on the box as follows:
Me - Any, SrcPort=Any, DstPort=TCP/80, Block Me - Any, SrcPort=TCP/80, DstPort=Any, Block This will block all HTTP traffic to/from the system at the local box, regardless of the external firewall or subnet configuration. General IPsec Capabilities Overviews http://www.microsoft.com/technet/com.../sm121504.mspx http://www.microsoft.com/technet/com...mt/sm0105.mspx General Guide for Using IPsec UI to Lock Down a Server: https://www.microsoft.com/technet/ne...y/ipsecld.mspx Scripted Port Block Examples (ipseccmd and netsh) http://support.microsoft.com/kb/813878 Jason "mxh" wrote in message ... I have a small network in my office. It connects to the internet via a Linksys BEFSR411 router (with a cable modem on the WAN port). Given the faster speeds of Gigabit for transfering files, I have a neatgear Gigabit switch connected to the uplink port on the Linksys router and have 3 machines connected to the Gigabit switch. All is well with the network and internet connections. I wish to add a machine that will contain digital images, mp3s and videos. This machine will act as a server only and will use XP as its OS. It will have a video card for set up and a Gigabit NIC. I do not wish to allow this machine to be accessed from or have access to the internet. What is the best way to set this up? I thought I would just add an additional NIC in the machines I will allow to have access to this new 'server', but googling tells me that this can be problematic (and I have yet to come across a success story). I know I could filter internet access from the server by filtering, but that's not the real issue. I really need to prevent access *from* the internet to this machine, which will have read only shares. I doubt that I'll really have any trouble, given that I am behind the router's firewall, but would like to take every precaution, since I will be 'serving' copyrighted content, and also to protect my network. Any ideas on how I would best accomplish this? I've cross-posted to relevant NGs because my last post regarding this issue went unanswered after a few weeks. Thanks, mxh |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|