![]() |
|
Welcome to Vista Banter. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
|
|||||||
| General Vista Help and Support The general Windows Vista discussion forum, for topics not covered elsewhere. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.general) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
P.S. Windows Vista Build 5536 is 100% Stable on my Dell XPS 600, and I see
no reason why it should not be named RC1, Just FYI. Now I am off to Read the Release Notes so that I do not mess up this Installation, Just FYI. wrote in message ... THANK YOU MICROSOFT! Kevin John Panzke (Microsoft Beta Tester & MSDN OS Level Tester) P.S. Do an Alt + Enter, Just FYI. |
|
|||
|
It's not named RC1 because it isn't. They make a lot of builds and they try
to name them carefully because they experiment around with each build and they have to be able to match what they did with the number of build. CH wrote in message ... P.S. Windows Vista Build 5536 is 100% Stable on my Dell XPS 600, and I see no reason why it should not be named RC1, Just FYI. Now I am off to Read the Release Notes so that I do not mess up this Installation, Just FYI. wrote in message ... THANK YOU MICROSOFT! Kevin John Panzke (Microsoft Beta Tester & MSDN OS Level Tester) P.S. Do an Alt + Enter, Just FYI. |
|
|||
|
You installed build 5536 on only one machine, yet proclaim "I see no reason
why it should not be named RC1". This is hardly the exhaustive testing that MS require before making such decisions. wrote in message ... P.S. Windows Vista Build 5536 is 100% Stable on my Dell XPS 600, and I see no reason why it should not be named RC1, Just FYI. Now I am off to Read the Release Notes so that I do not mess up this Installation, Just FYI. wrote in message ... THANK YOU MICROSOFT! Kevin John Panzke (Microsoft Beta Tester & MSDN OS Level Tester) P.S. Do an Alt + Enter, Just FYI. |
|
|||
|
And, Unfortunately, now that Microsoft has Fixed the Bug, that Allowed me to
Install Build 5472 on my older 256 MB RAM Compaq Pentium 3 933 MHz Computer, I now have only 1 Computer Available for Windows Vista Beta Testing, which is my DELL XPS 600, Just FYI. "Intel Inside" REMOVETHISBIT@com wrote in message ... You installed build 5536 on only one machine, yet proclaim "I see no reason why it should not be named RC1". This is hardly the exhaustive testing that MS require before making such decisions. wrote in message ... P.S. Windows Vista Build 5536 is 100% Stable on my Dell XPS 600, and I see no reason why it should not be named RC1, Just FYI. Now I am off to Read the Release Notes so that I do not mess up this Installation, Just FYI. wrote in message ... THANK YOU MICROSOFT! Kevin John Panzke (Microsoft Beta Tester & MSDN OS Level Tester) P.S. Do an Alt + Enter, Just FYI. |
|
|||
|
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:13:38 +0100, wrote:
THANK YOU MICROSOFT! Kevin John Panzke (Microsoft Beta Tester & MSDN OS Level Tester) P.S. Do an Alt + Enter, Just FYI. Alt + Enter does nothing..... -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|