A Windows Vista forum. Vista Banter

Welcome to Vista Banter.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

Go Back   Home » Vista Banter forum » Microsoft Windows Vista » Windows Vista and Games
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Windows Vista and Games Relating to running games and relateds issues under Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.games)

DirectX 9 performance in Vista RC1



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old September 10th 06, 07:38 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.games
cbhacking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13
Default DirectX 9 performance in Vista RC1

I play EVE and a few other games. EVE, in particular, is very DX9-intensive.
Although I had no trouble installing it and getting it to start (the Fonts
key registry trick is no longer needed) the game ran slowly, with low FPS
and long load times. I set it to compatibility mode: XP SP2 and now it works
MUCH better.

Just thought the community might like to know that, if your 3D gaming isn't
going very well. Of course, some games won't even install without
compatibility mode; those should already be set to use compatibility after
installation.

  #2 (permalink)  
Old September 11th 06, 12:39 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.games
Paul Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,377
Default DirectX 9 performance in Vista RC1

Thanks for posting!

--
Paul Smith,
Yeovil, UK.
Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User.
http://www.windowsresource.net/

*Remove 'nospam.' to reply by e-mail*

"cbhacking" wrote in message
...
I play EVE and a few other games. EVE, in particular, is very
DX9-intensive. Although I had no trouble installing it and getting it to
start (the Fonts key registry trick is no longer needed) the game ran
slowly, with low FPS and long load times. I set it to compatibility mode:
XP SP2 and now it works MUCH better.

Just thought the community might like to know that, if your 3D gaming
isn't going very well. Of course, some games won't even install without
compatibility mode; those should already be set to use compatibility after
installation.


  #3 (permalink)  
Old September 11th 06, 04:30 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.games
b
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 20
Default DirectX 9 performance in Vista RC1

I agree. Games written for Windows XP run much more slowly in Windows Vista,
but then again those games were not written for the Vista platform directly.
The drivers from ATI and NVIDIA are in bad need of major tweaking for the
platform as well. It will be interesting to see a game written specificially
for the Vista platform will do once the video drivers improve.
"cbhacking" wrote in message
...
I play EVE and a few other games. EVE, in particular, is very
DX9-intensive. Although I had no trouble installing it and getting it to
start (the Fonts key registry trick is no longer needed) the game ran
slowly, with low FPS and long load times. I set it to compatibility mode:
XP SP2 and now it works MUCH better.

Just thought the community might like to know that, if your 3D gaming
isn't going very well. Of course, some games won't even install without
compatibility mode; those should already be set to use compatibility after
installation.



  #4 (permalink)  
Old September 13th 06, 11:15 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.games
Robert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default DirectX 9 performance in Vista RC1

Are you using the stock Vista video drivers?

I installed the NVidia RC1 driver, and gaming performanced improved a lot.

"cbhacking" wrote in message
...
I play EVE and a few other games. EVE, in particular, is very
DX9-intensive. Although I had no trouble installing it and getting it to
start (the Fonts key registry trick is no longer needed) the game ran
slowly, with low FPS and long load times. I set it to compatibility mode:
XP SP2 and now it works MUCH better.

Just thought the community might like to know that, if your 3D gaming
isn't going very well. Of course, some games won't even install without
compatibility mode; those should already be set to use compatibility after
installation.



  #5 (permalink)  
Old September 13th 06, 11:51 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.games
MrCoffee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 27
Default DirectX 9 performance in Vista RC1

I'm using the stock drivers from the vista upgrade install.
it's not using both of my 7900gt ko 512meg cards in sli yet
but my fps is over 100 in ut2004 running 2048 x 1280 with everything set on
max.
i'd say it runs better on vista than it did on xp considering it's only
using 1 card right now.

"Robert" wrote:

Are you using the stock Vista video drivers?

I installed the NVidia RC1 driver, and gaming performanced improved a lot.

"cbhacking" wrote in message
...
I play EVE and a few other games. EVE, in particular, is very
DX9-intensive. Although I had no trouble installing it and getting it to
start (the Fonts key registry trick is no longer needed) the game ran
slowly, with low FPS and long load times. I set it to compatibility mode:
XP SP2 and now it works MUCH better.

Just thought the community might like to know that, if your 3D gaming
isn't going very well. Of course, some games won't even install without
compatibility mode; those should already be set to use compatibility after
installation.




  #6 (permalink)  
Old September 17th 06, 06:00 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.games
cbhacking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13
Default DirectX 9 performance in Vista RC1

My graphics card is an ATI Radeon Xpress 200M, currently 128MB VRAM. I use a
64-bit bersion of Vista (on AMD Turion64 1.8GHz proc). The stock driver
works fine, but offers almost no fine-grained controls (or even settings for
things like whether to stretch the viewable area for low resulotions, which
looks messed up on a widescreen display) so I installed the beta Catalyst
driver and configuration from ATI. It's much better than the version for
Beta2, but still a resource hog. In any case, I didn't do enough gaming to
benchmark the performance of the stock ATI driver that comes with Vista.
Generally, though, my FPS is sufficient and my games work.


"Robert" wrote in message
news:jLRNg.533161$Mn5.271037@pd7tw3no...
Are you using the stock Vista video drivers?

I installed the NVidia RC1 driver, and gaming performanced improved a lot.

"cbhacking" wrote in message
...
I play EVE and a few other games. EVE, in particular, is very
DX9-intensive. Although I had no trouble installing it and getting it to
start (the Fonts key registry trick is no longer needed) the game ran
slowly, with low FPS and long load times. I set it to compatibility mode:
XP SP2 and now it works MUCH better.

Just thought the community might like to know that, if your 3D gaming
isn't going very well. Of course, some games won't even install without
compatibility mode; those should already be set to use compatibility
after installation.




  #7 (permalink)  
Old September 19th 06, 11:48 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.games
wolf421
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10
Default DirectX 9 performance in Vista RC1

I just installed tron 2.0 on my rc-1 system and have yet to have and problems
playing it, The launcher for the game idenified my geforce fx5200 128mb with
no problems and saw the directx 9 installed no problems at all, and I'm
useing the updated driver from nvidia. Tron 2.0 runs great on rc-1 away lot
better than on the beta 2 release"shudder". Now if I can get some of my other
games to work on it I'll be in hog heaven and not caring until the rtm
release comes out in the stores. Along with Halo 2 "Must have Halo2, give me
Halo2 or die!!!! eheheheh!!!"
I loved the preview movie of it and just can't wait to get my hands on it.....
T-minus 4months and some odd weeks days and minutes seconds and counting.....
The pain of waiting is unbarable, and my malcavian mind is breaking under
the pressure...lol Vampire the Masquerade rpg....
--
Just when you thought you had the top of the line system...You find out that
you have to upgrade yet again. The pain gasp!!
The suffering!!
Until Payday!!!


"cbhacking" wrote:

My graphics card is an ATI Radeon Xpress 200M, currently 128MB VRAM. I use a
64-bit bersion of Vista (on AMD Turion64 1.8GHz proc). The stock driver
works fine, but offers almost no fine-grained controls (or even settings for
things like whether to stretch the viewable area for low resulotions, which
looks messed up on a widescreen display) so I installed the beta Catalyst
driver and configuration from ATI. It's much better than the version for
Beta2, but still a resource hog. In any case, I didn't do enough gaming to
benchmark the performance of the stock ATI driver that comes with Vista.
Generally, though, my FPS is sufficient and my games work.


"Robert" wrote in message
news:jLRNg.533161$Mn5.271037@pd7tw3no...
Are you using the stock Vista video drivers?

I installed the NVidia RC1 driver, and gaming performanced improved a lot.

"cbhacking" wrote in message
...
I play EVE and a few other games. EVE, in particular, is very
DX9-intensive. Although I had no trouble installing it and getting it to
start (the Fonts key registry trick is no longer needed) the game ran
slowly, with low FPS and long load times. I set it to compatibility mode:
XP SP2 and now it works MUCH better.

Just thought the community might like to know that, if your 3D gaming
isn't going very well. Of course, some games won't even install without
compatibility mode; those should already be set to use compatibility
after installation.




  #8 (permalink)  
Old September 22nd 06, 09:38 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.games
crayon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default DirectX 9 performance in Vista RC1

Good suggestion. I wonder if running Warcraft III in compatibility mode will
make the game play with sound again. Will try it out. While warcraft III
played perfectly, there was no sound...

"cbhacking" wrote:

I play EVE and a few other games. EVE, in particular, is very DX9-intensive.
Although I had no trouble installing it and getting it to start (the Fonts
key registry trick is no longer needed) the game ran slowly, with low FPS
and long load times. I set it to compatibility mode: XP SP2 and now it works
MUCH better.

Just thought the community might like to know that, if your 3D gaming isn't
going very well. Of course, some games won't even install without
compatibility mode; those should already be set to use compatibility after
installation.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright ©2004-2012 Vista Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.