View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old July 8th 08, 10:01 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
rempuii7[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Best format for ReadyBoost


Bender;3733321 Wrote:
Microsoft has written Readyboost to write to the flash memory in such a
way
as to even out the wear. Expect about 10 years of constant use before
the
number of write cycles becomes limited. By then a replacement should be
very
cheap, and probably not even needed as new technology makes Readyboost
technology obsolete (such as the newly discovered memresitor) .

"FiOS Dave" wrote in message
...
Thanks for the answer(s).

I have 2GB of RAM in the system, and currently have the SD card

formatted
as NTFS. Since I have no other need for the SD card, I will leave it

as
is.
I understand that there are a limited number of write cycles for

flash,
and wonder if there is a way to keep track?! I guess when the flash

card
fails, I will know that I have hit that limit...

Dave


"Ken Blake, MVP" wrote in message
news
On Wed, 7 May 2008 00:48:12 -0400, "FiOS Dave"
wrote:

I am using a 2GB SD card for ReadyBoost, and want to know
what is the best format to use for quickest operation.
I've tried FAT, FAT32, exFAT and NTFS, but don't see much
difference (except for available space!)


How much RAM do you have?

If you have 2GB or more of RAM, the little it might do for you is

so
slight as to be almost unnoticeable.

And if you have less than 2GB of RAM, you would do much better to
spend your money on upgrading your RAM to 2GB than on buying a

device
for ReadyBoost use.

So, in general, I recommend *against* using ReadyBoost.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Please Reply to the Newsgroup



My Vista only accept FAT32 as fast enough,I could use NTFS if I wanted
to,but I had to tweak a bit,so I think FAT32 is the default format for
ReadyBoost,each has its own style of Format so the default would be the
best .
If you had time you can read my post 'USB Flash Drive',in a very fast
flash drive the copy and paste is faster with FAT format then NTFS,while
in a very slow fash drive NTFS is faster.


--
rempuii7
------------------------------------------------------------------------
rempuii7's Profile: http://forums.techarena.in/member.php?u=52655
View this thread: http://forums.techarena.in/showthread.php?t=963274

http://forums.techarena.in