A Windows Vista forum. Vista Banter

Welcome to Vista Banter.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

Go Back   Home » Vista Banter forum » Microsoft Windows Vista » Networking with Windows Vista
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Networking with Windows Vista Networking issues and questions with Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing)

Network Location Awareness



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old September 12th 07, 06:56 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing
Emiliano
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Network Location Awareness

One of my problems with Vista is with the connection being broken after
returning from hibernation.

My home network is using NAT, I save my network configuration in the
alternate configuration section of the TCP/IP properties. This way I can
still use DHCP in other wireless networks without having to change my
settings. This has always worked fine in WINXP, but after returning from
hibernation, Vista is trying to connect via DHCP for like 10 minutes instead
of retrieving the settings from the Alternate Configuration. The NLA API
shows that it is "Identifying," and it gets stuck there for 10 minutes.
Meanwhile, the details for the connection show that it is connected and has
retrieved the DNS settings from the Alternate Configuration. But the IP,
subnet, and gateway address are what take so long. I'm sure there are more
people out there using NAT and DHCP who are having this problem. If DHCP is
not available isn't it suppose to attempt to use the Alternate Configuration
much quicker than the response that I am getting?

if anyone shed some light on this, or at least test it themselves, I would
really appreciate it.
  #2 (permalink)  
Old November 19th 07, 10:18 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing
Harold
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12
Default Network Location Awareness

I am having exactly the same issue, can anyone else help please?
Thanks
Harold-

"Emiliano" wrote:

One of my problems with Vista is with the connection being broken after
returning from hibernation.

My home network is using NAT, I save my network configuration in the
alternate configuration section of the TCP/IP properties. This way I can
still use DHCP in other wireless networks without having to change my
settings. This has always worked fine in WINXP, but after returning from
hibernation, Vista is trying to connect via DHCP for like 10 minutes instead
of retrieving the settings from the Alternate Configuration. The NLA API
shows that it is "Identifying," and it gets stuck there for 10 minutes.
Meanwhile, the details for the connection show that it is connected and has
retrieved the DNS settings from the Alternate Configuration. But the IP,
subnet, and gateway address are what take so long. I'm sure there are more
people out there using NAT and DHCP who are having this problem. If DHCP is
not available isn't it suppose to attempt to use the Alternate Configuration
much quicker than the response that I am getting?

if anyone shed some light on this, or at least test it themselves, I would
really appreciate it.

  #3 (permalink)  
Old November 20th 07, 12:32 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing
Robert L. \(MS-MVP\)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 481
Default Network Location Awareness

You may want to reset up power settings on NIC. This post may help,

Vista: after hibernate it can't ...Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:03 pm Post
subject: Vista: after hibernate it can't find my wireless network, Reply
with quote ...
http://www.chicagotech.net/netforums...opic.php?t=331


--
Bob Lin, MS-MVP, MCSE & CNE
Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on
http://www.ChicagoTech.net
How to Setup Windows, Network, VPN & Remote Access on
http://www.HowToNetworking.com


"Harold" wrote in message
...
I am having exactly the same issue, can anyone else help please?
Thanks
Harold-

"Emiliano" wrote:

One of my problems with Vista is with the connection being broken after
returning from hibernation.

My home network is using NAT, I save my network configuration in the
alternate configuration section of the TCP/IP properties. This way I can
still use DHCP in other wireless networks without having to change my
settings. This has always worked fine in WINXP, but after returning from
hibernation, Vista is trying to connect via DHCP for like 10 minutes
instead
of retrieving the settings from the Alternate Configuration. The NLA API
shows that it is "Identifying," and it gets stuck there for 10 minutes.
Meanwhile, the details for the connection show that it is connected and
has
retrieved the DNS settings from the Alternate Configuration. But the IP,
subnet, and gateway address are what take so long. I'm sure there are
more
people out there using NAT and DHCP who are having this problem. If DHCP
is
not available isn't it suppose to attempt to use the Alternate
Configuration
much quicker than the response that I am getting?

if anyone shed some light on this, or at least test it themselves, I
would
really appreciate it.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright ©2004-2012 Vista Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.