A Windows Vista forum. Vista Banter

Welcome to Vista Banter.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to ask questions and reply to others posts, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

Go Back   Home » Vista Banter forum » Microsoft Windows Vista » Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Performance and Maintainance of Windows Vista A forum for performance and maintenance tasks in Windows Vista. (microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintainance)

what does computer culture say about when to uninstqall-and-reinst



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old September 16th 07, 12:26 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
nweissma
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 68
Default what does computer culture say about when to uninstqall-and-reinst

my printer's driver, originally installed april 2007, was auto-updating
repeatedly through september, and was functioning magnificently; the printer
manufacturer had worked out all the kinks of vista compatibility. then, on
sept. 13, vista auto-updated (like the printer manufacturer, ms is always
improving its software, despite the banshee screams of ms-bashers); the ms
auto-update allowed an 'optional' update for my printer. naturally i
approved. turns out that the update was dated november 200*6*(!! - i can't
even figure out where this "update" came from!) my printer driver is now
manifesting the vista-incompatibility symptoms that it had several months
ago.

no big deal.

but, as an academic question, as a general rule, what is the accepted,
corrective strategy in these cases: should i uninstall and reinstall the
drivers (downloading the latest version from the printer manufacturer's
website)? should i resort to a vista restore point? it may be possible to
induce the outdated driver to once again auto-update - any ideas on how to
stimualte this behavior?
  #2 (permalink)  
Old September 16th 07, 02:46 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
PaulB
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 968
Default what does computer culture say about when to uninstqall-and-reinst

My personal opinion is to never let Windows update, update any hardware
drivers. Always get them from the manufacturer.
--
Paul


"nweissma" wrote:

my printer's driver, originally installed april 2007, was auto-updating
repeatedly through september, and was functioning magnificently; the printer
manufacturer had worked out all the kinks of vista compatibility. then, on
sept. 13, vista auto-updated (like the printer manufacturer, ms is always
improving its software, despite the banshee screams of ms-bashers); the ms
auto-update allowed an 'optional' update for my printer. naturally i
approved. turns out that the update was dated november 200*6*(!! - i can't
even figure out where this "update" came from!) my printer driver is now
manifesting the vista-incompatibility symptoms that it had several months
ago.

no big deal.

but, as an academic question, as a general rule, what is the accepted,
corrective strategy in these cases: should i uninstall and reinstall the
drivers (downloading the latest version from the printer manufacturer's
website)? should i resort to a vista restore point? it may be possible to
induce the outdated driver to once again auto-update - any ideas on how to
stimualte this behavior?

  #3 (permalink)  
Old September 16th 07, 03:40 AM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
Alex
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 255
Default what does computer culture say about when to uninstqall-and-reinst

In order to resolve this issue, please let me know the make and the model
number of the printer. You can try to disconnect the Printer from the
computer and then uninstall all the Printer related Information like Drivers
and Software. Make sure that there is nothing related to the printer and then
restart the computer. After restarting, connect the printer back to the
computer. If Vista has generic Drivers of this printer, it should install
them by default and the printer should work fine, if not disconnect the
printer again and update the Drivers from the Manufacturer's site and then
while installation of the Drivers connect the printer and it should work
well. If you still have any issues, please let me know the make of the
printer and also let me know if you upgraded your computer Operating System
from XP to Vista or did it come Pre installed with Vista?

"nweissma" wrote:

my printer's driver, originally installed april 2007, was auto-updating
repeatedly through september, and was functioning magnificently; the printer
manufacturer had worked out all the kinks of vista compatibility. then, on
sept. 13, vista auto-updated (like the printer manufacturer, ms is always
improving its software, despite the banshee screams of ms-bashers); the ms
auto-update allowed an 'optional' update for my printer. naturally i
approved. turns out that the update was dated november 200*6*(!! - i can't
even figure out where this "update" came from!) my printer driver is now
manifesting the vista-incompatibility symptoms that it had several months
ago.

no big deal.

but, as an academic question, as a general rule, what is the accepted,
corrective strategy in these cases: should i uninstall and reinstall the
drivers (downloading the latest version from the printer manufacturer's
website)? should i resort to a vista restore point? it may be possible to
induce the outdated driver to once again auto-update - any ideas on how to
stimualte this behavior?

  #4 (permalink)  
Old September 16th 07, 03:38 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_maintenance
Richard Urban
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,520
Default what does computer culture say about when to uninstqall-and-reinst

Roll back the driver. It is a neat function and it seems to work more
reliably than in Windows XP. Then, hide that defective update from Windows
update so you are not tempted to install it - yet again.

--


Regards,

Richard Urban
Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User
(For email, remove the obvious from my address)


"nweissma" wrote in message
...
my printer's driver, originally installed april 2007, was auto-updating
repeatedly through september, and was functioning magnificently; the
printer
manufacturer had worked out all the kinks of vista compatibility. then, on
sept. 13, vista auto-updated (like the printer manufacturer, ms is always
improving its software, despite the banshee screams of ms-bashers); the ms
auto-update allowed an 'optional' update for my printer. naturally i
approved. turns out that the update was dated november 200*6*(!! - i can't
even figure out where this "update" came from!) my printer driver is now
manifesting the vista-incompatibility symptoms that it had several months
ago.

no big deal.

but, as an academic question, as a general rule, what is the accepted,
corrective strategy in these cases: should i uninstall and reinstall the
drivers (downloading the latest version from the printer manufacturer's
website)? should i resort to a vista restore point? it may be possible to
induce the outdated driver to once again auto-update - any ideas on how to
stimualte this behavior?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright ©2004-2012 Vista Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.